Buy In#

Buy-in Quickstart #

If you already know you want to support this work, here is the short version. The ask is to voluntarily contribute about ~$8 per person per year, currently through the GoFundMe campaign linked here:

GoFundMe LINK to #AuditTheMath — GOES HERE

GoFundMe link — pending (LLoL to add)

The GoFundMe campaign URL is being prepared by LLoL and will be inserted on this page once live. Target: before the 2026m05d27 launch window. Action owner: LLoL.

If and when this initial #AuditTheMath startup campaign is successful enough, then better suitable ways to buy in will be developed eventually.

Note that the primary measure of success is not the total sum raised but how many people choose to have LLoL act as their advocate — transparently and under fiduciary responsibility — for averting accidental nuclear winter and the other existential risks that are otherwise too easily ignored.

Thus, ~$8 is the recommended baseline (a bit more than ~$2 cent/day), but LLoL realizes more than many that funds can be extremely tight, so less is welcome if that is all you can happily spare. However, if you are one of those relatively few globally, for whom ~$8 isn’t worth mentioning and who would like to give more, you are welcome to consider any sum up to the maximal per-person limits explained below in The ~$8 ask for help (further commentary on the action of buying in is also given below in How to Buy-in).

Read on for more on the buy-in framework if such details interest you. Else, follow one of the GoFundMe links above or below.

This Quickstart reviewed by LLoL; needs clean up and GoFundMe link.

Todo: clean up links internal up there; add gofundme link. Review by Claude

Background #

The research behind this site represents an intense 7+ year research marathon on how to avert existential disasters for humanity - assuming it is indeed possible. Running on this marathon Laurence Loewe of Laodicea, or LLoL, built on the wide interdisciplinary diversity-encouraging research insights he gained before. Without building on that prior expertise this intense extended period of deep and wide research would not have been possible. It may be described as a circumnavigation of the conceptual universe in search for universally sustainable solutions. LLoL made the trip and lives to tell the tale. However, bringing it to the point where it can be rigorously reviewed by the world’s leading experts, better explaining it to interested audiences, or frankly, even keeping the artifacts he collected on that journey from being obliterated in today’s world, all that requires funding. LLoL invested all he had and maxed out all credit he could possibly get. His 7+ years of work on finding the narrow path to life are about to be lost — unless others step in to join that path by funding the review and, if it proves true, the implementation of what LLoL found.

Why funding matters #

The discoveries presented on this site claim to identify superrational algorithms — encoded in the book of Revelation — for averting humanity’s self-made existential disasters. A claim of this magnitude requires serious, large-scale expert review. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, which requires extraordinary effort to review. LLoL found a way to uncover treasure-troves of evidence. He brought back as much as he could carry. Needless to say, he can’t be the one who does the reviewing in the interest of everyone else; he already did his reviewing.

Such broad and deep review cannot happen unless there is significant support from those who care about averting accidental nuclear winter or worse. The funding serves a specific purpose: to sustain researchers who commit to the fiduciary responsibility of fairly reviewing LLoL’s discoveries on behalf of the rest of humanity.

The alternative — starving out those who dedicate themselves to finding gentle kind reasonable solutions — is the cynical default that this project aims to overcome.

What “Buy In” means #

“Buy In” is this project’s term for conscious, voluntary investment in the work of review and dissemination. It is not a traditional purchase. It is not a donation. It is not an investment in the traditional sense that expects to quantify returns on investment in a usual way.

Buy-in is a clear commitment to one side of the contract described below to embody the principle that claims about humanity’s survival and potential ways to get there deserve rigorous examination rather than reflexive dismissal.

The other side of that contract is represented by LLoL’s commitment to do the best he can to reliably over the long term cut knowledge-faking and nurture life-giving decisions by working with everyone who is committed to do the same.

The goal is to support work towards scaling up a ResearchCity for implementing a gentle kind reasonable proper Jubilee System along the lines defined in SD3 below — the Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters (POAATAD).

The ~$8 ask for help #

The baseline ask is to voluntarily contribute about ~$8 per person per year for those who can.

Minimum. No real minimum, since all this is voluntary, but for practical purposes let’s say $1 is arguably a minimum because at that amount the transfer costs eat already so much of that 1$ that giving even less makes little sense (rather team up with a friend).

Recommended. To ensure that everyone can afford to be represented at ResearchCity’s design tables for the world’s future, a voluntarily buy-in of about ~$8 per person per year is recommended.

Maximal. That is where it gets a bit more complicated, because the maximal buy-in is not unlimited. This is in order to put strict limits on the influence-shopping that rich Laodicean contributors have been doing for millennia. To enable people to express preferential interests (as explained in Supporting Doc SD3 below), ResearchCity will eventually at its full scale support 1600 Research Talent Stadia, all working towards different aspects of a gentle kind reasonable, proper Jubilee System. Of these Talent Stadia an essential, tightly coupled set of 12 Core Stadia has already been defined by LLoL.

The hard, long-term limit for maximal support is about ~$8 per person per year per stadion in order to limit influence shopping. That is substantially more than the ~$8 per person that keeps stadion contributions affordable for most people. To be precise for this unique global launch opportunity the following flexibilities apply.

Up to 1600 stadia: Those who can may support more than 1 stadion, up to a max of 1600 stadia, which represents ResearchCity once fully scaled up.
Up to 7 years: LLoL is excessively late with this launch. Arguably 7 years late. Therefore, those who can may support scaling up by buying in retroactively for up to 7 years.
Sponsor up to 7 others (as a temporary global equalizer): Today only about 1 in 8 people worldwide has a credit card; the other 7 in 8 are forcefully excluded from contributing to a solution that is arguably in their own best interest. Building the infrastructure so that everyone can volunteer is itself one of ResearchCity’s goals — but until that exists, anyone (not only the wealthy) who wishes to may sponsor the buy-in of up to 7 other people who currently cannot buy in themselves. This is a temporary workaround to level an unequal playing field, not a way for one contributor to multiply their own influence.

Multiplying all those flexibilities together gives the absolute ceiling for a single very wealthy contributor — say a local billionaire who would rather their city were not incinerated by accidental nuclear winter, and who also chooses to sponsor 7 people currently locked out:

max ~$8/person/year/stadion × 1600 stadia = max ~$12,800 /person/year (usual personal limit)

max ~$12,800 /person/year × 7 years = max ~$89,600 /person (initial start-up catch-up)

max ~$89,600 × (1 self + 7 sponsored) people = max ~$716,800 total (global balancing start-up)

That × 8 is not a household loophole: it is one contributor plus the seven other, unrelated people they sponsor under the equalizer above — people who would otherwise be shut out entirely. Once that billionaire’s actuaries have worked through the RiskyMAD math of nuclear roulette for themselves, they may want to convince the billionaire to give even more, and the billionaire may agree. Yet LLoL will have to respectfully decline any further direct financial support, because that would violate LLoL’s self-imposed influence-shopping limits. That doesn’t mean the billionaire couldn’t do more — for example by speaking up, by reviewing Matheo studies, by sustainably sharing their wealth with others who can then make their own voluntary decisions about support for #AuditTheMath, or by any of the non-financial forms of buy-in listed under Buy in without money transfer. But direct financial support will have to be capped at the numbers above.

The ~$8 limit is generally written with a ~ to indicate the approximate nature, as (a) for most people the mapping will likely be approximate due to currency conversions, and (b) annual adjustments are to track the median income of the nation with the lowest GDP.

To conclude, the recommended voluntary ~$8/year/person buy in to support the scaling up of ResearchCity is designed to be manageable – albeit challenging – even for the poorest; yet for many in rich countries it is less than two takeaway lunches, two greeting cards, or a paperback book. Those who have more are welcome to buy-in more, albeit not more than the upper limit. Please self-enforce your applicable limits while LLoL is scaling up the infrastructure required for automatically tracking contributions.

The 50% give-away-rule #

Neither LLoL nor ResearchCity will be able to achieve their goals alone. That’s sort of obvious. What has been less than obvious to LLoL is how to express this appropriately. It’s all too easy to create an organization that pretends that it is all-important and requires ever-more funds to serve its particular interests.

Indeed, many corporations are legally bound by fiduciary duty to maximise shareholder returns at almost any cost — a structural mandate that the legal scholar Joel Bakan famously characterised as making the corporation “a psychopath” in a 2004 critique. The problem is not the humans inside such organizations; the problem is the legal architecture that obliges them — often against their own better judgement — to act as if they were such a person.

ResearchCity needs structural safeguards against drifting into the same trap. Indeed, a core mandate of ResearchCity is to find a way out of this legal prison. Specifically, the Talent Stadion STb11-LCC is devoted to evolving the legal structures and transparency standards required to define Limited Liability Charitable Companies (LLCCs) — extending the familiar LLC form so that an organization’s legally binding duties can include the common good, rather than being legally compelled to override it.

To keep ResearchCity from developing such a problem LLoL decided to give away 50% of all buy-ins in order to support worthy causes. Some of those worthy causes are already supported by the various governments of the world, so LLoL looks forward to establishing the infrastructure required for paying appropriate local taxes that support those respective local governments. Yet, as well known, governments can be limited in some of the good they can do. Hence, LLoL aims to scale up an infrastructure for dynamically giving away the remaining funds up to 50% of revenue in order to support those worthy causes that are currently most in need to avert some emergency.

For example, since investigative journalism has been hit for some time with one budget-cut after another, LLoL is looking to establish a way to support investigative journalists who dedicated their careers to uphold the truth but find themselves forced out of their chosen field for financial reasons.

There are many worthy causes that are currently pushed to the brink of extinction. LLoL knows from experience how difficult it can be to evaluate who really needs the funds and who asks because they can. He aims to leverage that expertise to evolve a network that can meet the needs of those who do the real work as they are. The goal is to bridge funding gaps on the way to find more sustainable ways to support their work (which is complicated; hence the need for a ResearchCity).

Scaling ResearchCity to Success #

Let’s assume most people go with the baseline ask of ~$8 per person per year, what will that enable? How many people will it take to get to which scaling goal?

The arithmetic works as follows:

Contributor pool	Annual Available	What this approximately sustains
~10,000 × ~$8/2	~$40,000	early operating costs (hosting, domains, archival, storage costs), keep LLoL in the race by meeting basic bills
~100,000 × ~$8/2	~$400,000	~4 full-time researcher-years at ~$100,000 all-inclusive per researcher-year, bare minimum to help #AuditTheMath
~1,000,000 × ~$8/2	~$4,000,000	~40 full-time researchers for a year — enough to start preparing Stage 0 for scaling up the envisioned ResearchCity
~10,000,000 × ~$8/2	~$40,000,000	~400 full-time researchers for a year — enough to complete Stage 0 and Stage 1 in scaling up the envisioned ResearchCity
~100 million × ~$8/2	~$400 million	~4000 full-time researchers for a year
~1000 million × ~$8/2	~$4000 million	May exceed ResearchCity’s near-term ability to make reasonably qualified hires, but not its ability to call for the global processes required to start an international competition for finding and buying the ~133,333 to ~150,000 acres of suitable land for the envisioned 1,600 Talent Stadia ResearchCity (per-stage area estimates are given in SD8a — ResearchCity hardware).

Each row shows ~$8/2 because of the 50% give-away rule: half of every contribution is passed on to other worthy causes, so only half remains available to sustain ResearchCity’s own work. The figure ~$8 per person per year is the maximal per-person-per-stadion contribution defined in the POAATAD framework documents (see SD3 below) for a year. Researcher all-inclusive cost figures above (~$100,000/researcher-year) are mid-range estimates that include salary, benefits, and project overhead. These costs are initially expected to be higher; they are expected to come down as ResearchCity scales up and efficiencies of scale allow for more precise, transparent, actual stadion-level cost calculations.

How to Buy-in #

Now that you read this far, here is the action. The recommended way to buy in is as follows:

Understand what you support voluntarily.
Make up your mind how much you freely want to give.
Make sure you can afford it.
Buy in — then follow the payment-processing link, currently the GoFundMe campaign linked here:

GoFundMe LINK to #AuditTheMath — GOES HERE

GoFundMe link — pending (LLoL to add)

The GoFundMe campaign URL is being prepared by LLoL and will be inserted on this page once live. Target: before the 2026m05d27 launch window. Action owner: LLoL.

That’s it — one click, one voluntary contribution, no need to sign anything on your part, because your buy-in is what binds LLoL to evolving the legal framework as described below (SD3, and more generally on Balospe.com), in order to evolve ResearchCity for supporting The Jubilee System to avert existential threats over the long term. The ~$8 baseline is the recommended default (a bit more than ~$2 cent/day); consider the per-person guidance in The ~$8 ask for help above for the minimum and maximum limits.

As the initial #AuditTheMath startup campaign infrastructure scales up, more sustainable and transparent ways to buy in will be set up or developed — this GoFundMe campaign is the initial start-up phase.

If financial buy-in is not feasible for you right now — or you are already at the upper cap and still want to do more — the Buy in without money transfer page lists practical non-financial ways to back ResearchCity: from printing Wall-Street-sized Flying-Scroll posters for actual buildings down to bumper stickers, social-media reposts, or simply telling someone else who might care.

Remember that what is being counted here is people, not dollars: each buy-in adds one more voice asking LLoL to carry this advocacy work on their behalf — transparently, and bound by fiduciary responsibility — so that averting accidental nuclear winter, and the other risks too easily waved aside, finally have someone whose job it is to take them seriously.

Institutions, Granters, and other Influencers #

The same per-person contribution caps apply to institutions as to individuals, by design — and this is what protects the project’s structural independence from any single funder. If you have read this far and are considering a “larger contribution” through some institutional vehicle, please understand: the cap is the feature, not a bug to be negotiated around. This refusal applies equally to foundations, philanthropic vehicles, religious institutions, academic funders, corporations, and other groups of any kind. The cap is not anti-institution, it is anti-influence-shopping, to ensure that ResearchCity remains equally committed to the common good for all.

Hence, if your institution/group/corporation is able to make a contribution to its own survival by supporting serious work toward averting accidental nuclear winter, then your institution/group/corporation is welcome to buy in using its corporate credit card as if it was a private person. No more, no less.

Yet, one of the tenets of ResearchCity is that money is not everything.

Hence, scaling up ResearchCity may benefit, without any money transfer, from institutional partners and influencers in various ways. Some need neither permission nor coordination at all, such as printing the Wall-Street-sized Flying-Scroll posters on a building façade as a public plea to save that building from accidental nuclear winter, or re-sharing materials from Balospe.com on a high-reach channel. The liberal Jonah License used for all new Balospe.com materials implies that such free sharing may be done by anyone, anywhere it is legally allowed, without asking LLoL first — the Flying Scroll posters are licensed for exactly that. Other forms, however, need coordination, such as sharing infrastructure, archival hosting, expert review time, venue access, or introductions to others who can help on the project’s own terms. Some practical non-financial action possibilities are catalogued at Buy in without money transfer — including options suited to large institutions and scaled-down options for influencer websites. For these coordinated kinds of support, any institution or influencer is warmly welcome to send ideas or offers to the address below:

To: [email protected] Subject: Institutional partnership offer for ResearchCity Body: Dear LLoL, Our institution / organization / group, [NAME], would like to discuss a non-financial form of support for #AuditTheMath / ResearchCity: [Briefly describe what you can offer: infrastructure, archival hosting, review time, venue access, introductions, etc.] With kind regards, [Your name and role]

For the many diverse institutional readers genuinely evaluating whether this work meets their standards: rather than asking LLoL to write finely tuned grant applications for each of their special programs to make LLoL an extension of their special interests, Balospe.com presents all the existing material an evaluating committee can read at its own pace. These pages were compiled to carry the case for diverse audiences:

Science — the core argument for why accidental nuclear winter is a real near-term risk, and why it is worth funding now the narrow Exodus path LLoL is calling for by supporting the 7–8-stage scaling-up of the ResearchCity LLoL envisions. The underlying probabilistic RiskyMAD model — an actuarial estimate of the waiting time to accidental nuclear winter — is set out in Supporting Document SD1 and developed in full in the Matheo-b16 RiskyMAD study (in active drafting, open for audit).
Matheo Study Series — overview — the Matheo study series, in active drafting and open for audit, sets out the mathematical-theology argument for implementing proper Jubilees. In a nutshell: machines need maintenance, democracies need proper free elections, and innovation economies need regular, well-organized, self-improving, proper Jubilees in order to avoid self-destruction by accidentally misguiding innovation. Hence, The Jubilee System matters, irrespective of religion. Kekulé dreamt about a snake biting its own tail, which led him to the structure of benzene later in the lab. Nobody today cites the irrationality of that dream to doubt the ring-like structure of benzene. LLoL merely says: “I have a dream … It’s worth helping me to check the math, even if the argument is too great for me to present it to the completion and perfection I’d naturally would like to present it to.” Refutations are explicitly welcomed via Audit the Math, but LLoL can only deal with them and his work will only matter if there is an audience sufficiently hungry for the truth to invest in the information infrastructures required to sort out the details reliably.
LLoL — Laurence Loewe of Laodicea — LLoL’s bio, scientific track record, and the radical-transparency commitment underwriting this work.
The 2014 Journal of Chemical Physics paper (Ehlert & Loewe, J. Chem. Phys. 141:204109) on the Lazy Updating algorithm — the same mathematical structure that, in 2024, LLoL realised maps onto the hard problem of reliably evaluating in principle how well different Jubilee implementations work across diverse organisational structures (see The Jubilee System for hints at that connection; details to be spelled out).

It may take a bit of patience for readers of specific highly optimized grant review systems to find the details most important for them, as everyone has different priorities. This is not a slight of the many systems grant officers necessarily need to use to do their excellent and important work, often under very difficult circumstances. It is merely a recognition of the fundamentally different nature of the ResearchCity envisioned and hence an acknowledgement of the fundamentally different funding process required to implement that vision. The gap ResearchCity is built to fill is by definition a different one: it is defined by all the existential problems that fall through the cracks of every existing framework precisely because they are no single institution’s mandate. Such challenges are either routinely waved away as “that’s nothing”, “not our job”, “too complicated”, or similar. If established funders already had these covered, the world would not be in its current state. In that sense ResearchCity is meant to become everyone’s Ministry of nothing: the catch-all whose whole job it is to pin down how that mountain of accumulated “nothing” keeps endangering humanity.

This is why LLoL inverts the usual process. Asking him — or anyone — to spend their remaining years rewriting the same core materials into one bespoke application after another, instead of doing the work, serves no one’s common good. So the existing material is laid out here imperfect as it is, for any committee to read at its own pace. Anyone who wishes to support a ResearchCity serving the common good for all is warmly welcome to buy in. Those who would rather wait are of course free to watch this effort struggle and burn — until it succeeds. Risk assessment is naturally a personal and subjective decision. LLoL deemed an annual 1 in 40 chance of accidental nuclear winter or worse as sufficient to motivate him to walk out on that ledge of creating a framework that allows everyone else to buy in at minimal risk (such as ~$8 for trying to establish a gentle kind reasonable ResearchCity).

Therefore, if these materials do not fit a particular institution’s evaluation framework, that may simply signal a mismatch in mission or format, and that is fine: buy-in stays voluntary for individuals and institutions alike. One can lead a horse to water, but one cannot make it drink. What LLoL cannot do is bend the work itself to fit frameworks shaped by inherited positions of power — not if it is to enable the Zoning, Investigating, Organizing, and Navigating needed to serve the common good for all.

Audit the math before (or after) contributing #

You don’t need to share my faith to share this work. Science is itself a tradition obsessed with the truth — in a real sense a fourth Abrahamic faith, or maybe the zeroth — and the one question here is whether the math holds. Audit it. If it does, the rest can wait; if it doesn’t, tell me where.

This project’s first principle is that claims about humanity’s survival must be publicly auditable. The contribution channel on this page exists in parallel with the audit channel — not as a replacement for it:

For the engagement-funnel reader (no time for technical audit): the $8 per year is a vote of trust for the project to be audited — not a vote of trust that LLoL has the answers. The math has to earn its standing on its own; your contribution sustains the work while it does. See Audit the Math for the audit invitation.
For the technical reader (mathematician, theologian, epidemiologist, policy expert): please audit first, then decide. The Matheo Study Series — overview series sets out the mathematical argument (in active drafting, and open for audit); refutations are explicitly welcomed via FF+audit-the-math@balospe.com.

For a personal framing — via the Aesop dung-beetle parable that holds the metaphor — see this blog post: Prophetic Dung Beetle for Mathematical Theology. Briefly, LLoL’s most prized possessions, such as his 2025 poster exhibition (Good News Pack MMv3), the Matheo-Study series that builds on it, and his life-time collection of research materials (foundational to both — in early 2026 a sprawling 2000 sq ft filling 11 storage units), are all intricately interconnected Gordian Knots of dots connected about the world. Yet, to outsiders these may merely look like more or less organized hairballs, indistinguishable in value from the dung balls of a dung beetle. Hence, LLoL pleads to respect the work invested by treating it as essential fertilizer for growing a better world. Maybe this call will be heard at a time, where much of the world’s fertilizer is currently stuck at the Strait of Hormuz.

POAATAD: The deeper contract framework #

For readers who want the full institutional vision behind the Buy-In ask, the Good News Pack contains a 2-page contract framework that formalises what the contributions are for:

SD3 — POAATAD: Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters defines seven empowerments that signers grant LLoL:
- advocate to avert avoidable disasters;
- scale up a ResearchCity in 7-8 full revision stages to support proper Jubilees;
- enable existential-risk decision support;
- negotiate with nuclear powers;
- engage cultural and theological questions;
- start building AIPTO (a proposed soft-war successor to nuclear-armed alliances); and
- explore Great-Filter survival paths.
SD3a — Contract Overview is page 1 of the contract, naming the seven empowerments above and the $8 per year per person figure explicitly.
SD3b — Contract Signature Page is page 2, detailing offer, consideration, risk disclosure (financial, social, political, personal), and signature block.

Contributing via GoFundMe is the lightweight entry point — While it’s no formal signature and hence no formal contract, it is a unique start-up contribution towards enabling LLoL to work towards establishing the means required for establishing such formal POAATAD contracts.

Hence, for practical purposes, contributing to the GoFundMe AuditTheMath campaign is an informal one-year commitment to support LLoL’s work toward ResearchCity, because the next step is either way to #AuditTheMath, which includes auditing the POAATAD and setting up a more reliable infrastructure for signing it and for buying in in a way that remains voluntary to the best of anyone’s ability to ensure.

The POAATAD is a limited, 1-year power of attorney, narrowly restricted to Advocating To Avert Disasters through the scaling up of the ResearchCity envisioned by LLoL as it evolves through #AuditTheMath — not the unlimited authority that the bare phrase “power of attorney” may suggest at first reading. The ~$8 is the consideration given to LLoL for doing the work of advocating; hence, it is a proper contract — one that maximally binds LLoL to the work, while requiring only the extremely limited contribution of ~$8 for supporting that work.

Those who are still not convinced that this is a good deal may wish to ask themselves: Who is currently advocating for averting accidental nuclear winter? Do they have an independent party that speaks transparently for all sides? Are the currently best advocates either speaking for well-known special interests (e.g. each super-power for itself) or are the true advocates hidden (and hence lack transparency and global accountability)? Whose job is it to engage with all other existential disasters that get otherwise ignored?

Those who don’t have satisfactory answers for these questions may wish to consider whether they can find a better alternative than this POAATAD supported by LLoL’s ongoing #AuditTheMath campaign.

Hence, both the formal POAATAD signature and the informal GoFundMe contribution send the same essential message of support: “I back LLoL’s work toward averting accidental nuclear winter.” The legal-commitment level differs, but the support is real either way — and either is enough to help launch #AuditTheMath.

Buy-in Conclusion #

To summarise: Buy-in is designed to remain voluntary at ~$8 per person per year — capped to protect against influence-shopping, with 50% given away to other worthy causes, supporting the scaling up of a ResearchCity built to break out of the legal architecture that currently forces corporations into self-maximising behaviour. Such ambitious goals cannot be achieved without sufficient funds and LLoL’s analyses show that a max of ~$8 per person per year per stadion is essential for avoiding the aggregation of special interest funding; the flip-side of that coin is that everyone wishing for common goods to be guarded for everyone is then asked to take the time to convince themselves to support such a Jubilee-based common goods effort in order to scale up a ResearchCity for supporting Jubilee organizing over the long term.

To get this whole operation started, getting the underpinning mathematical theology right is essential, hence the call to #AuditTheMath. Since auditing math at such a huge global scale is impossible without sufficient practical support, the initial #AuditTheMath campaign has been set up on GoFundMe to allow those who cannot audit the math in person express their support for those who work towards this goal. This big work can only get done by working together in unprecedented ways. Hence, LLoL’s call for all who wish to support a ResearchCity for averting existential threats through organizing regular proper Great Jubilee Races: Please buy in to support #AuditTheMath through this link here:

GoFundMe LINK to #AuditTheMath — GOES HERE

GoFundMe link — pending (LLoL to add)

The GoFundMe campaign URL is being prepared by LLoL and will be inserted on this page once live. Target: before the 2026m05d27 launch window. Action owner: LLoL.

Note that the most costly risks in proposing this vision have been already paid. Auditing the math is comparatively easy. Following the math has some engineering challenges, but is also relatively easy compared to defining the math in the first place.

To tip the balance requires enough people who care about averting accidental nuclear winter — and the other existential risks addressed by ResearchCity — to decide that this work is worth ~$8 a year for a research stadion they care about, as well as some of their own attention, time, voice, or visibility.