Salt b17 — Policy Design, Fairness, and Theological Agency

This crystal collects adversarial exchanges about policy design constraints (Arrow’s impossibility), cross-traditional equivocation on justice mechanisms, and the theological dimension of free will and volunteer participation.

Status summary: Working within Arrow’s constraints (PRO b35). Tradition equivocation fully conceded (PRO b34). Free will metaphysics does not block the practical argument (PRO b19). Champions are functionally volunteers (PRO b22).

Related crystals: Salt b16 — Wealth Concentration, History, and Voluntariness (voluntariness), Salt b15 — Mechanism Specificity: Why Jubilee? (mechanism specificity).

Con/Pro Pairs in this Crystal

• Con-E.9 — ax15 (Libertarian Free Will) Is Contested; Compatibilism Undermines ax17
• Pro-E.9 — Response to Con-E.9 (ax15 Compatibilism)
• Con-E.12 — Volunteer Requirement Is a Theological Assertion, Not a Mathematical Derivation
• Pro-F.12 — Response to Con-E.12 (Volunteer Requirement)
• Con-E.2.10 — Cross-Traditional Support for ax25 Is Equivocation
• Pro-G.2.10 — Response to Con-E.2.10 (Cross-Traditional Equivocation)
• Con-E.2.11 — Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem Applies to Jubilee Design
• Pro-E.2.11 — Response to Con-E.2.11 (Arrow’s Impossibility)