SD3 — POAATAD: Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters

A limited durable 1-year power of attorney empowering LLoL to build ResearchCity on behalf of signers.

Download the original document (PDF)

SD3 Combined — PDF (140 KB) — 2 pages, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: sd3-poaatad-power-of-attorney-advocating-to-avert-disasters-iv_llol_qqv4_2025m12d03-2page.pdf

WebP preview (372 KB)

Also in this folder: SD3a — Contract overview · SD3b — Contract signature page

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —Start—

Abstract

Supporting Document SD3 is a 2-page quasi-legal contract defining the POAATAD — a limited durable 1-year Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters. It appoints LLoL as attorney in-fact to build ResearchCity on behalf of anyone who signs it, limited to gentle kind reasonable advocacy to avert disasters of any kind.

Page 1 (SD3a) — Contract Overview: Defines 7 empowerments the POAATAD grants:

1. Advocate anywhere to avert avoidable disasters, starting with the worst

2. Scale up ResearchCity gentle kind reasonably in 7-8 stages (~1+6+1 month each) to dismantle the 7DUIs

3. Solve existential challenges from local to global scales via free access to the ToL (Tree of Life-giving decision-support)

4. Negotiate with the 10 Nuclear Kings, UN Security Council, and relevant experts — “Put Earth in Escrow”

5. Engage with challenging cultural, social, political, economic, and spiritual questions to improve global healing resilience

6. Start building AIPTO (Atlantic Indian Pacific Treaty Organization) — advanced soft-war Work-Logic Cascades replacing nuclear weapons and brutal hard-war WoLCs

7. Explore potential offers by extra-terrestrials to survive the Great Filter, including submitting ResearchCity to Yas’ leadership

Each POAATAD transaction is ~$8/year/person/stadion, transferred through LLoL’s subsidiaries as a “mustard-seed network of trust.”

The contract requires LLoL to resist BABL (Blindly Authorizing Auto-Stereotyping Habits) and MOLOCH (Mistakes Oppressing Life Omitting Crucial Help). It also establishes the PEARL (Peer Evaluation Analysis Reviews Library) and HELL (Historically Experienced Lessons Library) as public accountability mechanisms.

Page 2 (SD3b) — Contract and Signature: Elaborates the offer, negotiation, and consideration structure. Key terms:

• All sales are voluntary; 1-year renewable trust commitment

• Bootstrap sale retroactively covering 7 years of work

• ~$8/person/year/arena max; credit card support for up to 7 people

• 1600 Talent STadia with specialized arenas; 288,000 FiShFus

• Limited Liability Charitable Company rules for transparency

• 4 risk categories: Financial (limited refunds), Social (Loewe may look like a “devil unknown”), Political (culture wars), and Personal (BABL leadership risks)

• E-signature block at the bottom

The signer declares: “I am being recreated daily as a Homo transiens … to serve Reality in myself, in all beings, and in all systems for improving Jubilees.”

Key Concepts at a Glance

POAATAD	Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters — limited, durable, 1-year, renewable
AIPTO	Atlantic Indian Pacific Treaty Organization — proposed successor to military alliances, using soft-war WoLCs
MOLOCH	Mistakes Oppressing Life Omitting Crucial Help — what LLoL commits to resist alongside BABL
PEARL	Peer Evaluation Analysis Reviews Library — public accountability mechanism for ResearchCity
HELL	Historically Experienced Lessons Library — archive of mistakes to prevent their repetition
1600 Talent STadia	The organizational structure: 1600 specialized arenas for different topics, funded by 288,000 FiShFus
Homo transiens	The signer’s declaration of transformation — moving beyond Homo sapiens toward a being that serves Reality
$8/year/person	The proposed annual contribution per person per stadion

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)

SD3 is unlike any other document in the Good News Pack: it is a signable contract. This moves the project from exposition to action.

1. Legal-adjacent framing. While not drafted by a lawyer, POAATAD deliberately uses legal structures (power of attorney, consideration, limited liability, risk disclosure) to signal seriousness and create a framework for accountability.

2. Radical transparency commitment. LLoL explicitly binds himself to “full transparency” and creates mechanisms for public oversight (PEARL, HELL). The “risks of signing” section on page 2 is unusually candid, including the risk that “Loewe will look like a ‘devil unknown.’”

3. The AIPTO concept. Proposing a successor to military alliances (Atlantic Indian Pacific Treaty Organization) that uses “advanced soft-war Work-Logic Cascades” instead of nuclear weapons is a concrete institutional design proposal.

4. Bootstrapping economics. The contract attempts to solve a chicken-and-egg problem: ResearchCity needs funding to prove itself, but proving itself requires funding. The “bootstrap sale” and credit-card-for-7 model are specific mechanisms for this.

Document Information

Document ID	SD3 (Supporting Document 3) with SD3a (overview) and SD3b (signature)
Full title	POAATAD: Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters
Version	iv_LLoL_QQv4_2025m12d03 (MMv3 release); iv_LLoL_RRv1r1p1_2025m01d24+m05d29 (contract internal)
Format	2-page contract (overview + signature page)
License	Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain
Part of	Good News Pack MMv3, Supporting Documents collection
PDF size	140 KB (combined); SD3a and SD3b also available separately
WebP size	372 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

• SD1 — Avert nuclear winter (RiskyMAD model)

• SD2 — Introduction to epiocracy

• OL10 — Open Letter to 10 Nuclear Kings

• Signature request pages in signature-request/ folder

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —End—

Collapse all Expand all

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

3. Send.

To: FF+mmv3-supporting-doc-sd3-poaatad-iv_llol_qqv4_2025m12d03@balospe.com CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-supporting-doc-sd3] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-supporting-doc-sd3] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

• Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

• Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.