SD3a — POAATAD Contract Overview#

Page 1 of 2: A limited durable 1-year Power Of Attorney enabling ResearchCity to advocate for averting disasters on behalf of signers.

Download the original document (PDF)

SD3a — PDF (76 KB) — 1 page, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: sd3a-contract-overview-poaatad-advocating-to-avert-disasters-iv_llol_qqv4_2025m12d03-page.pdf

WebP preview (372 KB)

SD3a — POAATAD Contract Overview

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract#

SD3a is page 1 of the 2-page POAATAD (Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters) — a limited durable 1-year power of attorney enabling ResearchCity, as led by LLoL, to advocate on behalf of signers.

The contract overview authorizes 7 actions:

  1. Advocate to avert disasters anywhere, starting with the worst

  2. Scale ResearchCity in 7–8 stages, gentle kind reasonably

  3. Solve existential challenges via the ToL (Tree of Life-giving decision-support)

  4. Negotiate with the 10 Nuclear Kings and relevant experts

  5. Engage with cultural, social, political, economic, and spiritual questions to improve global healing resilience

  6. Build AIPTO (Atlantic Indian Pacific Treaty Organization)

  7. Explore extra-terrestrial offers to survive the Great Filter

The funding model is approximately $8/year/person, transferred through LLoL’s subsidiaries as a “mustard-seed network of trust.”

The bottom section of page 1 explains the 7 Death Urn Incinerators (7DUI) — the seven categories of existential threat the POAATAD aims to dismantle — and the 7Capstone concept that crowns the ResearchCity architecture.

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)#

  1. Scope of empowerment. The 7 authorized actions range from local disaster advocacy to negotiations with Nuclear Kings and even extra-terrestrial contact — a deliberately maximal scope bounded by the constraint of gentle kind reasonable advocacy.

  2. Micro-funding architecture. At ~$8/year/person (~2 cents/day), the POAATAD proposes a funding model designed for universal accessibility, avoiding dependence on large donors.

  3. 7DUI as threat taxonomy. The 7 Death Urn Incinerators provide a structured classification of existential risks that the POAATAD contract is designed to address, connecting the legal instrument directly to the analytical framework.

Key Concepts at a Glance#

POAATAD

Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters — limited, durable, 1-year, renewable

7 empowerments

Advocate, Scale, Solve, Negotiate, Engage, Build AIPTO, Explore

7DUI

7 Death Urn Incinerators — the existential threat categories the contract aims to dismantle

7Capstone

The capstone concept crowning the ResearchCity architecture

~$8/year/person

The proposed annual contribution per person per stadion

AIPTO

Atlantic Indian Pacific Treaty Organization — proposed successor to military alliances using soft-war WoLCs

Document Information#

Document ID

SD3a (Supporting Document 3, page 1 of 2)

Full title

POAATAD Contract Overview — Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters

Author

LLoL

Version

iv_llol_qqv4_2025m12d03

Format

1-page contract overview with 7 empowerments, 7DUI list, and 7Capstone summary

License

Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Part of

Good News Pack MMv3, Supporting Documents collection

PDF size

76 KB

WebP size

372 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 —End—

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-sd3-sd3a] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-sd3-sd3a] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.