SD9 — Transparency Pledge: Birth Photo of ResearchCity#

A court filing from LLoL’s foreclosure case, offered as radical transparency evidence for the birth of ResearchCity.

Download the original document (PDF)

SD9 — PDF (776 KB) — 1 page, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: sd9-transparency-pledge-researchcity-birth-photo-foreclosure-court-iv_llol_qqv4r3_2026m03d02.pdf

WebP preview (344 KB)

Also in this folder: Hardship explanation & DARL business plan

SD9 — Transparency Pledge

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —Start—

Abstract#

Supporting Document SD9 is a 1-page annotated court document — an Electronic Filing Notice from the State of Wisconsin Circuit Court, Dane County (Case No. 2024CV000867), filed 2024-03-22. The case is Wintrust Mortgage, Barrington Bank & Trust Co., N.A. vs. Loewe — a foreclosure of mortgage action.

LLoL presents this court filing as the “Birth Photo of ResearchCity” — a metaphor he explains in annotations: “Every birth is messy and complicated. Most pictures of actual births are not beautiful — same for the data here.” He frames the foreclosure as the personal cost of his 6+ year research marathon, and the court filing as evidence of radical transparency.

LLoL’s handwritten annotations on the document state: “I offer this access in the interest of full disclosure” and “None of these files can replace talking to me! So, call me if you care to avert Armageddon!” He provides the court’s electronic filing access code (Pro Se opt-in code: 85090c) so interested parties can verify that “not AI but I myself, LLoL, produced the files of my Good News Pack.”

The summary at the bottom explains: LLoL submitted “tons of exhibits & pleadings” to explain to a local court and bank why they should give his marathon more time. He failed. To save his research, he sold his home to “a gracious last minute home buyer” and ran down the proceeds “to allow You to give ResearchCity a chance.”

The document also notes: “my wife at the time was NOT responsible for this court action at all. So she is to be left in peace from all inquiries.”

Key Concepts at a Glance#

Birth Photo

The foreclosure filing as metaphorical “birth photo” of ResearchCity — messy, ugly, but documenting the beginning

Radical transparency

LLoL makes court records publicly accessible to prove he is serious and has nothing to hide

Personal cost

Loss of home through foreclosure, proceeds used to fund continued research

Internal Item ii_of_LLoL

LLoL’s labeling system for documents that are personal/internal but offered for transparency

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)#

SD9 is the most personally vulnerable document in the Supporting Documents series. By making a foreclosure proceeding part of the Good News Pack, LLoL demonstrates the personal cost of his research marathon and backs up his transparency pledges with verifiable legal records.

Document Information#

Document ID

SD9 (Supporting Document 9)

Full title

Transparency Pledge — Birth Photo of ResearchCity

Court case

State of Wisconsin, Dane County, Case No. 2024CV000867

Version

iv_LLoL_QQv4r3_2026m03d02

Format

1-page annotated court filing

License

Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Part of

Good News Pack MMv3, Supporting Documents collection

PDF size

776 KB

WebP size

344 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —End—

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: FF+mmv3-supporting-doc-sd9-transparency-pledge-iv_llol_qqv4r3_2026m03d02@balospe.com CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-supporting-doc-sd9] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-supporting-doc-sd9] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.