Naming Convention for Teaching and Communication#
This page is for anyone who teaches, preaches, or writes about the axioms on this site and needs to cite them correctly. You do not need a technical background — just a willingness to follow a consistent convention so that your audience can trace your references back to the source.
1. The prose reference convention#
When you mention an axiom, theorem, or other formal element in a sermon, lecture, or paper, use this pattern:
First mention: Model + Element. Write
Pet ax5orPet ax5 --- Containment. This tells the reader which axiom system (Pet) and which element (axiom 5) you are discussing.Subsequent mentions: Element only. Once your audience knows you are talking about the Pet model, you can write just
ax5. Switch back to the full form whenever ambiguity is possible — for example, when comparing axioms from different models.Parenthetical style:
ax5 (Pet)orax5 (Jub)works well in footnotes, captions, or inline citations where the model is secondary.
2. Models and what they cover#
Two models are currently active:
Code |
Name |
Scope |
|---|---|---|
Pet |
Pan-En-Theistic foundation |
14 axioms (ax1–ax14) formalizing how God and the world relate: containment, transcendence, necessity, presence, sustaining dependence, and a consistency test for revelation claims. |
Jub |
Jubilee-System extension |
11 axioms (ax15–ax25) extending Pet into human agency, delegated authority, non-coercive guidance, genuine love, lasting innovation, and periodic recalibration. |
In labels, models are always lowercase: pet, jub. In prose,
use title case: Pet, Jub.
3. Element types#
Code |
Name |
What it is |
|---|---|---|
|
Axiom |
A starting assumption — accepted as given so you can see what follows. |
|
Theorem |
A result proven from the axioms. Every theorem traces back to specific axioms. |
|
Contra (objection) |
A formal objection raised against one or more axioms or theorems. |
|
Pro (response) |
A formal response defending the system against an objection. |
4. The depth system#
Every formal element can appear at multiple levels of detail, aimed at different audiences:
Depth |
Audience |
What you get |
|---|---|---|
Easy |
General public |
Plain-language explanation, everyday analogies, one representative quote per tradition. No formulas. Think museum placard. |
Producer |
Teachers, communicators |
The explanation plus citation guidance, worldview perspectives, and enough formal context to teach from. You are here. |
Expert (default) |
Researchers, theologians |
Full formal statement (LaTeX), complete scriptural citations from all traditions, dependency network, known limitations, and versioning history. |
Math |
Mathematicians |
Formal extraction only: logical framework, axiom statements, proofs. No commentary. |
When citing, you may want to specify the depth so your audience lands
on an appropriate page. In a label, depth appears as a suffix:
pet-ax5-easy, pet-ax5-prod. The bare label pet-ax5 always
points to the expert (default) view.
5. Worldview perspectives#
The same axiom can be viewed through different traditions. This is one of the distinguishing features of mathematical theology: each axiom draws independent support from multiple scriptural and philosophical traditions, and any tradition can be examined on its own terms.
Worldview codes use a v prefix:
vjud— Judaism (Torah, Talmud, Kabbalah, modern Jewish thought)vchr— Christianity (Gospels, Apostolic writings, Church fathers, modern theology)visl— Islam (Quran, Hadith, Sunni/Shia traditions, Sufi, modern)vhin— Hinduism (Vedas, Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita, Vedanta)vsec— Secular (philosophy, empiricism, humanism, naturalism)Additional views:
vbud(Buddhism),vbah(Baha’i),vzor(Zoroastrian), and others.
Source codes use an s prefix for specific textual corpora:
stor (Torah), sgos (Gospels), squr (Quran), ssan
(Sanskrit texts), and others.
How to reference in teaching: “Pet ax5, as seen through a Jewish
lens” corresponds to pet-ax5-vjud. “ax5 with Quran citations” can
be found at pet-ax5-squr (source-level) or pet-ax5-visl
(tradition-level synthesis).
6. Linking to specific views#
When sharing a link to a specific page, the URL follows the site structure. For example:
The easy overview of all axioms:
balospe.com/en/matheology/axioms/easy/The expert view of Pet axiom 5:
balospe.com/en/matheology/pet/axioms.html#pet-ax5
Within the site, cross-references use RST labels:
:ref:`pet-ax5` renders as “Pet-ax5 — Containment” and always
resolves, even if files are reorganized.
7. Version pinning for academic citations#
If you are writing an academic paper or any document that needs a stable reference, cite the versioned form. Versions are frozen snapshots that will never change:
pet-ax5-oov2— Pet ax5 as frozen at version OOv2The versioned URL path
/matheology/vv/oov2/...is immutable
The unversioned label (pet-ax5) always points to the latest
content, which may evolve. For reproducibility, pin to a version.
8. Quick-reference card#
You want to say |
Write this |
|---|---|
First mention in prose |
Pet ax5 — Containment |
Subsequent mention |
ax5 |
Parenthetical citation |
ax5 (Pet) |
RST cross-reference |
|
Easy version |
|
Jewish perspective |
|
Pinned to version |
|
For the complete naming architecture, see the expert reference. For the technical design decisions behind this system, see the architect page.