StayVS — Stabilizing Versioning System

StayVS is the system used across Balospe.com to track how mature and well-checked any piece of content is. Every page on this site carries a content stability indicator in its footer that tells you at a glance how much confidence to place in what you are reading.

LLoL has been developing and using StayVS internally since about 2017, and it has much matured since. This page here is a brief reminder to say that eventually a more adequate introduction ought to follow here.

In a nutshell, StayVS is a self-stabilizing versioning system designed to end the world’s mis-information problems by fighting time-travling errors in versioning spaces. A self-stabilizing versioning system is essential for self-stabilizing innovation processes. It also turns out that organizing for proper Jubilee-based innovation is as good as impossible without an agreed-upon reliable self-stabilizing versioning system that supports Jubilees natively.

StayVS distinguishes seven stages through their double-letter stability codes to offer transparency at a glance.

As the mathematical theology of the Jubilee system grows in maturity, so must StayVS in order to support the related 7 stages distinguishable in any general innovation system.

Why does this matter?

This site covers ambitious, interconnected topics. Some pages are well-established; others are early drafts or experimental explorations. StayVS makes this transparent so you can calibrate your reading accordingly:

• A page marked MM is a first draft — the idea exists but is untested.

• A page marked NN is in death valley — it needs resources to reach viability.

• A page marked OO is a minimum viable product — it works, but oddly.

• …

• A page marked SS has been stabilized through broad global review.

The StayC lifecycle

StayC (Stability Codes) track a page’s maturity through seven stages:

Code	Name	Meaning
MM	MockupModel	Idea exists informally as back-of-envelope reasoning or verbal sketch. No formal statement yet. The intuition is present but has not been cast into precise language.
NN	NimbleNonfunctional	The innovation’s death valley: the idea has been stated but does not yet function. It needs feeding — resources, refinement, and iteration — to grow into a minimum viable product (OO). Most innovations die here, not because they are worthless, but because they run out of energy before crossing the valley. NN carries hope of rescue.
OO	OperatesOddly	A minimum viable product exists. Formal statement is present, believed true, but no proof has been attempted. The MVP works, but oddly — much refinement is required.
PP	PathProbing	Formal statement accompanied by a proof or structured argument. A stable core exists, but it has not yet been adversarially tested and may harbor hidden weaknesses.
QQ	QualityQuest	Subjected to adversarial review. Objections have been raised; some resolved, some remain open. The claim is under active defense, increasingly refined but still fluid.
RR	ReviewedRelease	All critical objections resolved. The author judges the claim publication-ready. Remaining objections (if any) are classified as non-critical or as scope limitations.
SS	StableSource	Widely accepted by the relevant community after broad global review and adoption. Multiple independent checks exist. Comparable to an internationally stable standard.

What Versioned Variant Numbers (VVNs) mean

You will see VVNs that look like dv_LLoL_OOv2r1p0_2026m03d30 in page footers. VVN elements are connected by underscores to form a single block to simplify searching. Here is how to read an example:

• dv_ — StayVS versioning regime (e.g. dv = developer versioning, the standard case)

• LLoL — nickname of who made the following maturity assessment

• _OO — the stability code (StayC) of StayVS measures maturity (e.g. OperatesOddly, see table above)

• v2r1p0 — version 2, revision 1, patch 0

• _2026m03d30 — date of the assessment,

When a page shows dv_Auto_MMv1_... it means the footer was auto-generated and the author has not yet assessed the content stability.

Learn more

For the full technical specification of StayVS and its components:

• StayVS overview — the complete system

• StayC codes — maturity lifecycle details with analogies and examples

• OKScale — the BioBinary verdict system (OK, KO, OKO, MIS)

Collapse all Expand all

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant iv_LLoL_OOv1_2026m04d01 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

See also on Balospe.com

• StayVS — Stabilizing Versioning System — full StayVS technical specification

• StayC — Stability Codes for Maturity Tracking — StayC lifecycle with analogies

Epic Fury to Epic Empathy: Fund a ResearchCity for Mathematical Theology

For millennia, Jews, Christians, Muslims, and others have fought wars — and fueled apocalyptic fears — over theological questions that none of them could state precisely enough to resolve. Mathematical theology offers a way out: translate the claims into formal axioms, check them for consistency, and discover where traditions actually agree once ambiguity is removed.

First explorations reveal a striking result: all three Abrahamic scriptures converge on the same pan-en-theistic structure when mapped to formal axioms. If that convergence holds under rigorous scrutiny, it can defuse centuries of eschatological conflict by showing that many disagreements are verbal, not logical.

But this work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining axioms, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does real-world testing of what matheology discovers.

If you believe replacing eschatological warfare with mathematical clarity is worth pursuing before it’s too late, please fund this work — every contribution helps evolve a global ResearchCity for finding the narrow path to peace.

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [stayvs] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [stayvs] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

• Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

• Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.