SD3b — POAATAD Contract Signature Page#

Page 2 of 2: The contract terms, risk disclosures, and signature block for the POAATAD power of attorney.

Download the original document (PDF)

SD3b — PDF (112 KB) — 1 page, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: sd3b-contract-signature-poaatad-advocating-to-avert-disasters-iv_llol_qqv4_2025m12d03-page.pdf

WebP preview (448 KB)

SD3b — POAATAD Contract Signature Page

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract#

SD3b is page 2 of the 2-page POAATAD contract, containing the formal terms, risk disclosure, and signature block. The page is structured into five sections:

  1. Offer — LLoL offers to build ResearchCity from approximately 2 cents/day contributions, featuring a transparency revolution, 288,000 FiShFus (Fiduciaries Sharing Futures) organized in 1600 Talent STadia.

  2. Negotiation via EDEN — A 42-day inquisition period (Evolving Diversity Encouraging Negotiation), voluntary funding, and YasPyr App feedback as the primary negotiation channel.

  3. Consideration — A bootstrap retro-sale model: all sales are final, the conceptual art PDF is provided as-is. The signer acknowledges the experimental nature of the entire framework.

  4. Risks of signing — Four risk categories are disclosed: (a) Financial — limited refunds, experimental venture; (b) Social — LLoL may appear as a “devil unknown”; (c) Political — potential culture-war entanglement; (d) Personal — BABL leadership risks in any large-scale project.

  5. Risks of not signing — The counterpoint: what happens if no one acts, given the existential threats documented in SD1.

The signature line at the bottom completes the contract.

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)#

  1. Radical risk disclosure. The contract explicitly warns signers that LLoL “may look like a devil unknown” and that all four risk categories (financial, social, political, personal) are real. This level of candor in a fundraising instrument is unusual.

  2. EDEN as negotiation framework. Using the EDEN protocol (Evolving Diversity Encouraging Negotiation) as the contract’s negotiation mechanism embeds the project’s epistemological framework directly into its legal structure.

  3. Bootstrap economics. The retro-sale model attempts to solve the problem of funding a project that has no track record: instead of promising returns, it offers participation in an experiment with full disclosure of what could go wrong.

Key Concepts at a Glance#

Offer

Build ResearchCity from ~2 cents/day per person, with transparency revolution and 288,000 FiShFus in 1600 Talent STadia

EDEN negotiation

42-day inquisition via Evolving Diversity Encouraging Negotiation, with YasPyr App feedback

Bootstrap retro-sale

All sales final, conceptual art PDF as-is, retrospectively covering 7 years of foundational work

4 risk categories

Financial (limited refunds), Social (perception), Political (culture wars), Personal (BABL leadership risks)

FiShFus

Fiduciaries Sharing Futures: 288,000 paid long-term thinkers organized in 1600 Talent STadia

Signature block

E-signature for the signer declaring transformation as Homo transiens

Document Information#

Document ID

SD3b (Supporting Document 3, page 2 of 2)

Full title

POAATAD Contract Signature — Terms, Risks, and Signature

Author

LLoL

Version

iv_llol_qqv4_2025m12d03

Format

1-page contract with offer, negotiation, consideration, risk disclosure, and signature block

License

Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Part of

Good News Pack MMv3, Supporting Documents collection

PDF size

112 KB

WebP size

448 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 —End—

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-sd3-sd3b] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-sd3-sd3b] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.