STb11-LCC — Evolve Limited Liability Charitable Company Standards#

Two documents for ResearchCity Talent Stadion STb11-LCC: the AIMS ket and concept art for evolving business standards with LLCC rules for transparent economics.

Download the original documents (PDF)

1. STb11-LCC AIMS Ket: PDF — 1 page, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: aims-1-stb11-lcc-evolve-limited-liability-charitable-company-std-iv_llol_ppv2r22p2_2025m11d15-ket.pdf

WebP preview

2. STb11-LCC Concept Art (2023): PDF

Filename: aims-2-stb11-lcc-concept-art4limited-liability-charitable-company-iv_llol_ppv1_2023m07d30-frame.pdf

WebP preview

STb11-LCC — Limited Liability Charitable Company AIMS ket STb11-LCC — Concept art for Limited Liability Charitable Company

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —Start—

Abstract#

STb11-LCC defines the Limited Liability Charitable Company stadion — proposing a new business standard that merges the flexibility and power of LLCs with the goodwill of charities. This collection contains the AIMS ket and a concept art frame.

The mission: Evolve balancing standards for businesses with Limited Liability Charitable Company (LLCC) rules for all to aid all easing-explaining parity-protecting insight-informing required for transparent economics.

The five outcome clauses specify that STb11-LCC:

  • Supports scaling up Talent Stadia in ResearchCity by merging LLC flexibility with charitable goodwill

  • Stops death by default from short-selling futures by instead guarding the long-term work of Fiduciaries Sharing Futures

  • Offers transparent and efficient global admin support for new LinkSpaces and ‘wILDER’ Fellowships (via STb12)

  • Balances all interests in OrgTrials and IndTrials using the best known Jubilee algorithms (STa9–STb10)

  • Fights BABL’s idols in Promised Lands by growing common goods in FUN/Flying University Networks to avert Armageddon-disasters missed by other agencies

Key Concepts at a Glance#

LLCC

Limited Liability Charitable Company — a proposed hybrid entity merging LLC flexibility with charitable mission

Fiduciaries Sharing Futures

An alternative to short-selling: fiduciaries who guard long-term value rather than extracting short-term profit

LinkSpaces

New organizational units within ResearchCity supported by LLCC infrastructure

wILDER Fellowships

Advanced fellowships (via STb12-FUN) for wid-e Independent Learning Developing Educating Researching

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)#

STb11-LCC addresses the organizational infrastructure required to make ResearchCity functional. While other stadia define what to do (pandemic defense, theological research, educational games), STb11-LCC defines how to organize the entities that do it. The LLCC concept — merging limited liability with charitable purpose — attempts to solve a real structural problem: charities lack business agility while businesses lack charitable accountability. The “Fiduciaries Sharing Futures” concept directly challenges short-selling culture, proposing fiduciary responsibility as the default for economic actors.

Document Information#

Document IDs

STb11-LCC AIMS Ket; STb11-LCC Concept Art

Author

Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL)

Dates

AIMS ket: 2025-11-15; Concept art: 2023-07-30

Versions

iv_LLoL_PPv2r22p2_2025m11d15 (ket); iv_LLoL_PPv1_2023m07d30 (concept art)

Format

1 AIMS ket page + 1 concept art frame

License

Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Part of

Good News Pack MMv3, Flying Scroll / Transwarp Key collection

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —End—

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-flyingscroll-transwarpkey-stb11-lcc] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-flyingscroll-transwarpkey-stb11-lcc] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.