SD8a — Ark Hardware: ResearchCity Vision#

“Noah’s Ark in a head stand: 1600 Arks turned on their head to build ResearchCity.” The physical infrastructure vision.

Download the original document (PDF)

SD8a — PDF (4.4 MB) — 1 page (large file), Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: sd8a-ark-hardware-colossal-hierapolis-of-laodicea-iv_llol_qqv1r0p1_2024m10d03-page.pdf

WebP preview (504 KB)

Warning

The PDF is 4.4 MB — a large download. The WebP preview (504 KB) provides a lighter alternative for initial viewing.

SD8a — Ark Hardware: ResearchCity Vision

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract#

SD8a presents the physical infrastructure vision for ResearchCity: “Noah’s Ark in a head stand — 1600 Arks turned on their head to build ResearchCity.” The poster details a 7-stage scaling plan from a single research home to a full 1600-ArkTower city:

  • Stage 0: 1 wid-e Research Home (~10x10 m², 1 person, model: Exodus Tabernacle)

  • Stage 1: 7 TrackRoles in G7 group (~40x40 m², 200 m long pillars, model: Promised Land)

  • Stage 2: 8x7 in G70 group (~160x160 m², 4 m/level, model: Judea)

  • Stage 3: th1 Prototype ArkTower (~480x480 m², 1 wid-e STadion, model: Noah’s Ark meets Laodicea)

  • Stage 4: th4 ArkTower build th1–th4 (1 km², model: 4Beings)

  • Stage 5: T12 Pearls Towers (~1.5x2 km², 12 Pearl Gates)

  • Stage 6: T48 Pearl Views Towers (~3x4 km², model: Great Jubilee Race)

  • Stage 7: Build 1600 ArkTower ResearchCity (~288K FiShFus, ~$64B/ST)

Construction uses GluLam wood (glue-laminated timber): 50-level towers with 200 m³ pillars. The 7ChangeStages are mapped to building levels, creating a physical structure that embodies the institutional development process.

The poster frames the choice as “Choose Life” (build ArkCity from the ruins) versus “Choose Death” (keep the status-quo in OrkCity). References include Ezekiel 37 (valley of dry bones) and Revelation’s urban science (the city that descends).

The funding model projects ~$8/person/year/stadion, with the full ResearchCity housing approximately 40 million homes.

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)#

  1. Architecture as theology. The 7-stage scaling plan maps each building stage to a biblical model (Tabernacle, Promised Land, Noah’s Ark, etc.), making the physical structure a concrete expression of the theological framework.

  2. GluLam as material choice. Choosing glue-laminated timber over steel or concrete is both an environmental statement and a practical commitment to sustainable construction at massive scale.

  3. Stage 0 concreteness. Starting at a 10x10 m² single-person research home grounds the vision in something immediately buildable, avoiding the trap of only imagining the final state.

Key Concepts at a Glance#

7-stage scaling

From 1 research home (Stage 0) to 1600 ArkTowers (Stage 7), each stage approximately quadrupling area

ArkTower

Multi-level research tower: 50 levels, GluLam construction, 200 m³ pillars

GluLam wood

Glue-laminated timber construction for all tower structures

Headstand metaphor

Noah’s Ark inverted: instead of floating on water to survive a flood, towers stand on land to survive datageddon

Choose Life / Choose Death

The binary framing: build ArkCity or remain in OrkCity

~40 million homes

The full ResearchCity capacity at Stage 7

~$8/person/year/stadion

The proposed funding rate for each Talent STadion

Document Information#

Document ID

SD8a (Supporting Document 8, page 1 of 2)

Full title

Ark Hardware: Colossal Hierapolis of Laodicea

Author

LLoL

Version

iv_llol_qqv1r0p1_2024m10d03

Format

1-page high-density poster with 7-stage scaling plan, construction specifications, and biblical mapping

License

Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Part of

Good News Pack MMv3, Supporting Documents collection

PDF size

4.4 MB

WebP size

504 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 —End—

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-sd8-sd8a] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-sd8-sd8a] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.