SD6 fig — 4 Horsemen Millstone of BABL#

“The 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse: How nothing Kills any Paradise.” The BABL millstone as circular diagram.

Download the original document (PDF)

SD6 fig — 4 Horsemen — PDF (84 KB) — 1 page, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: 4-horsemen-millstone-of-babl-iv_llol_qqv0r4p1_2023m12d17-page.pdf

WebP preview (284 KB)

SD6 fig — 4 Horsemen Millstone of BABL

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract#

This figure presents the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse reinterpreted as BABL’s millstone — a circular diagram showing how “nothing kills any paradise.” The diagram maps four phases of the natural ZION cycle:

  1. Seed / Zoning — planting and defining boundaries

  2. Feed / Investigating — nurturing through inquiry

  3. Grow / Organizing — structuring toward maturity

  4. Reap / Navigating — harvesting and steering forward

These four phases correspond to the natural Mt.13 sequence (the parable of the sower). BABL’s corruption reverses and distorts this order into the Rev.6 wrong order that kills by:

  • Over-simplifying (reducing complex reality to slogans)

  • Over-complicating (burying insight under bureaucratic layers)

  • Over-reaching (grabbing more than can be sustained)

  • Randomizing (destroying any remaining coherence)

The figure identifies three idols as the engines of this corruption: BAAL (blind authority), ASHERAH (blind comfort), and MOLOCH (blind sacrifice) — the three ancient patterns that perpetuate BABL’s millstone grinding.

The diagram also shows the Serendipity I/O Filter of ZION — the mechanism by which unexpected discoveries can break the millstone cycle and redirect toward the natural Mt.13 growth sequence.

The “efficiency perversion bug” is highlighted: BABL reorders the natural seed-feed-grow-reap cycle into an “efficient” but destructive sequence that skips nurturing and jumps to reaping, collapsing the system.

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)#

  1. Four Horsemen as algorithm. Reinterpreting the apocalyptic horsemen as phases of BABL’s algorithmic cycle transforms a prophetic image into an analyzable process — one that can be identified and interrupted.

  2. Mt.13 vs Rev.6 as ordering problem. The insight that the difference between paradise and apocalypse is a sequence error (the same four phases in wrong order) is both simple and profound. It suggests that the problem is not the elements themselves but their arrangement.

  3. Three idols as corruption engines. BAAL, ASHERAH, and MOLOCH as recurring patterns of authority-worship, comfort-worship, and sacrifice-worship provide a taxonomy for diagnosing institutional corruption.

Key Concepts at a Glance#

4 Horsemen

The apocalyptic riders reinterpreted as BABL’s four-phase destructive cycle

Mt.13 sequence

The natural order: Seed, Feed, Grow, Reap — the parable of the sower as growth algorithm

Rev.6 wrong order

BABL’s corrupted sequence that kills by over-simplifying, over-complicating, over-reaching, and randomizing

BAAL, ASHERAH, MOLOCH

Three ancient idol patterns: blind authority, blind comfort, blind sacrifice — engines of BABL’s millstone

Efficiency perversion bug

BABL skips nurturing and jumps to reaping, collapsing the natural growth cycle

Serendipity I/O Filter

ZION’s mechanism for breaking the millstone via unexpected discoveries

Document Information#

Document ID

SD6 fig (Supporting Document 6, figure)

Full title

4 Horsemen Millstone of BABL

Author

LLoL

Version

iv_llol_qqv0r4p1_2023m12d17

Format

1-page circular millstone diagram with four-phase cycle, three idol engines, and serendipity filter

License

Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Part of

Good News Pack MMv3, Supporting Documents collection

PDF size

84 KB

WebP size

284 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 —End—

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-sd6-4horsemen] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-sd6-4horsemen] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.