SD6 fig — Datageddon Millstone Prison

“Die in BABL or run to ZION to live!” A circular millstone diagram mapping 12 governance forms in their descent.

Download the original document (PDF)

SD6 fig — Datageddon Prison — PDF (148 KB) — 1 figure, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: datageddon-ocracy-millstone-prison-iv_llol_qqv0r1p12_2024m05d06-fig.pdf

WebP preview (76 KB)

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract

This figure presents the Datageddon Choice as a circular “millstone” diagram: “Die in BABL or run to ZION to live!” It maps 12 governance forms in a descent from best to worst:

• Meritocracy (rating 0, best) — governance by demonstrated competence

• Tweetocracy — governance by viral messaging

• Twistocracy — governance by distortion of truth

• Kleptocracy — governance by theft

• Arsonocracy — governance by destruction

• Brutalocracy — governance by brute force

• Collapsocracy (rating 6, worst) — governance by collapse

With Anarchy and Occultarchy at the bottom, representing the complete breakdown of governance structures.

Each governance form is mapped to two frameworks:

• 7Churches (Ephesus through Laodicea, EPH–LAO) — the seven churches from Revelation 2–3, each representing a stage of institutional development and decay.

• 7Tribes pairs — pairing governance forms with cultural identity patterns.

The central message is that BABL “spins wheels in the desert, goes in circles, like a millstone” — cultures trapped in BABL’s cycle oscillate between these governance forms without escaping. The millstone prison shows no exit within the circle itself; escape requires a fundamentally different approach (shown in the companion diagram, Datageddon Escape).

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)

1. Governance as spectrum. Mapping 12 governance forms on a single descent axis provides a diagnostic tool: any society can locate itself on this spectrum and see what comes next if the current trajectory continues.

2. 7Churches as institutional diagnostics. Linking governance forms to the Revelation churches creates a theological-institutional framework where each church’s strengths and failures correspond to specific governance pathologies.

3. The prison metaphor. The circular millstone as prison communicates that the problem is not which governance form a society has, but that it is trapped in a cycle that rotates through all of them without escape.

Key Concepts at a Glance

Datageddon Choice	Die in BABL or run to ZION to live — the binary framing of the governance crisis
12 governance forms	From Meritocracy (best) through Collapsocracy (worst), with Anarchy and Occultarchy at the bottom
Millstone prison	BABL’s circular trap: societies rotate between governance forms without escaping the cycle
7Churches mapping	Each governance form linked to Revelation 2–3 churches (EPH through LAO)
7Tribes pairs	Cultural identity patterns mapped to governance forms
No internal exit	The millstone shows no escape within the circle — escape requires the fundamentally different approach shown in the companion Datageddon Escape diagram

Document Information

Document ID	SD6 fig (Supporting Document 6, figure)
Full title	Datageddon-ocracy Millstone Prison
Author	LLoL
Version	iv_llol_qqv0r1p12_2024m05d06
Format	1-page circular millstone diagram with 12 governance forms, 7Churches mapping, and 7Tribes pairs
License	Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain
Part of	Good News Pack MMv3, Supporting Documents collection
PDF size	148 KB
WebP size	76 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

• SD6 — BABL Millstone Algorithm (parent page)

• 4 Horsemen Millstone of BABL

• Datageddon Escape to Epiocracy

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 —End—

Collapse all Expand all

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhF_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-sd6-datageddon-prison] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-sd6-datageddon-prison] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

• Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

• Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.