STb11-LCC Concept Art — LLCCs for Life Certificate#

A certificate-style concept art document (2023) presenting the vision for Limited Liability Charitable Companies — mission statement, vision for transparent economics, and founding principles.

Download the original document (PDF)

STb11-LCC Concept Art — PDF (1.4 MB) — 1 page, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: aims-2-stb11-lcc-concept-art4limited-liability-charitable-company-iv_llol_ppv1_2023m07d30-frame.pdf

WebP preview (512 KB)

Also in this folder: STb11-LCC AIMS Ket

STb11-LCC Concept Art — LLCCs for Life certificate

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhJ_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract#

This certificate-style concept art document presents the founding vision for LLCCs for Life — a proposal to “Evolve a Standard Limited Liability Charitable Company.” The document is framed with an ornamental certificate border, signaling its aspirational character.

Mission: Scale up wid-e research Stadia Talent in stages to tame the datageddon of corporation structures that echo greed slavery, indirectly forced labor bias, and grinding BABL millstones of overreaching expectations. Start with a “well-defined Limited Liability Charitable Company LLCC add-on standard” for transparent gentle kind reasonable servant leadership.

Vision: Limited Liability Charitable Company LLCC standards separate concerns of scales and risks to grow mental wealth for the Jubilee platform by better self-stabilizing innovation via risk-taking. Each person’s talent-risking work power stays limited to their royal prophetic priestly service responsibility and reward in the Jubilee cycle.

Key principles include:

  • A gentle kind reasonable logic that transparently guards humane equal dignity by a wid-e approach

  • BasicMoney for living protected from all risky ExtraMoney for investing and improving

  • Separation of global concerns with dignity for all

  • Growing the Tree of Life-giving decision-making for all

The document is credited as “1 of 2 cent shield in 2022” and labeled as a “Contribution in ArtCard Year.”

Key Concepts at a Glance#

LLCCs for Life

The brand name for the proposed business entity standard, emphasizing life-serving economics over profit extraction

BasicMoney / ExtraMoney

Separation of living-protected funds (BasicMoney) from risk-taking investment funds (ExtraMoney) — a practical mechanism for protecting dignity while enabling innovation

Certificate format

The document’s visual framing as a certificate signals both aspiration and accountability — a standard to be earned

Ergodic CEO

The footnote references an “Ergodic CEO reaching for the Bottom” — connecting business leadership to ergodic theory and servant leadership

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)#

This 2023 concept art predates the formal AIMS ket (2025) by over two years, showing long-term development of the LLCC idea. The BasicMoney/ExtraMoney distinction addresses a real structural problem in modern economics: the mingling of subsistence funds with speculative capital, which exposes vulnerable populations to market volatility. The certificate format is a deliberate design choice, suggesting that LLCC status should be earned and displayed publicly — accountability through transparency. The document’s vision section articulates what the AIMS ket formalizes: business structures that serve Jubilee economics rather than undermining them.

Document Information#

Document ID

STb11-LCC Concept Art

Author

Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL)

Date

2023m07d30

Version

iv_LLoL_PPv1_2023m07d30

Format

Single-page certificate-style concept art frame

PDF size

1.4 MB

License

Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Part of

Good News Pack MMv3, Flying Scroll / Transwarp Key / STb11-LCC

Related documents:

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhJ_2026m04d16 —End—

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhJ_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-twk-stb11-lcc-aims-2-art] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-twk-stb11-lcc-aims-2-art] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.