Evolvix Vision — Best Naming Intro: Semantic Reproducibility

Introduction to Evolvix BESTnaming — 4 naming dialects that separate conflicting demands of diverse audiences by nailing all synonyms to 1 NAMESTREE ROOT.

Download the original document (PDF)

Best Naming Intro — PDF (100 KB) — 2 pages, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: evx-vision-best-naming-intro-semantic-reproducibility-iv_llol_qq2_2019m06d17-2card.pdf

WebP preview (116 KB)

Also in this folder: Naming Achilles Heel, Naming Synonyms Core

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhH_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract

This 2-page card set introduces BESTnaming — Evolvix’s system for managing the conflicting naming demands of diverse audiences.

Page 1 — The problem: “Naming is like plumbing in a bigdata society: making the wrong connections can easily create a mess!” and “Jargon for outsiders is like pipes of data unhinged from connections: they lack meaning and leak all content that was sent into the wastelands of non-sense.” The solution: Evolvix.org/BESTnaming — disrupting disruptions of research by nailing all synonyms to 1 NAMESTREE ROOT for storing 1 stable meaning over the long term. References a 95-page study of the key concept.

Page 2 — The BEST system: Four naming dialects serve different user personas:

• Brief names → for the Busy power geek → shaped for Brevity to cut typing

• Explicit names → for the Expert developer → shaped for Easy reading and writing

• Summarizing names → for the Starting student → shaped for Succinct explanation

• Technical names → for the Terminology expert → shaped to Target domain terms

Each name is 1 Label for 1 Box. For stable code, retrace the box each versioned synonym maps to. The NAMES acronym: Non Ambiguous Memorable Encoding Systems Translate Received Expressions Emitting Retraced Original Operation Tasks.

1 NAMESTREE = 1 ROOT = 1 Box = 1 container with Data, Code, Names formally explaining 1 StableMeaning, fully versioned to increase stability.

“BESTnaming is a breakthrough, because it safely translates code among dialects that separate naming concerns of diverse audiences.” References: Annals N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1387 (2017) 124 or Evolvix.org/naming.

Key Concepts at a Glance

BEST dialects	Brief, Explicit, Summarizing, Technical — four naming dialects tailored to different user personas
1 Name = 1 Label for 1 Box	Every name maps to exactly one container of data, code, and names with one stable meaning
NAMESTREE ROOT	The single root explanation that all synonyms in a naming tree map back to
Plumbing metaphor	Naming in a bigdata society is like plumbing: wrong connections create messes; disconnected pipes leak meaning

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)

BESTnaming addresses a real problem in scientific software: the same concept often needs different names for different audiences (brief for power users, explicit for developers, summarizing for students, technical for domain experts). Most languages force a single naming convention. BESTnaming’s four-dialect system allows the compiler to translate between them automatically, maintaining semantic identity while adapting surface form. The 95-page study in Annals N.Y. Acad. Sci. (2017) provides the theoretical foundation; these cards are the accessible introduction.

Document Information

Document ID	EVX Naming Intro — BESTnaming (Flying Scroll, transwarpkey/sta1-evx/)
Author	Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL)
Date	2019m06d17
Version	iv_LLoL_QQ2_2019m06d17
Format	2-page card set
License	Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain
Part of	Good News Pack MMv3, Flying Scroll / Transwarp Key / STa1-EVX
PDF size	100 KB
WebP size	116 KB

Related documents:

• STa1-EVX stadium overview (parent page with all 30 documents)

• Naming Achilles Heel (why naming is the foundational challenge)

• Naming Synonyms Core (visual diagram of synonym relationships)

• Simplicity in Lasting Standards (the simplicity principle underlying BESTnaming)

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhH_2026m04d16 —End—

Collapse all Expand all

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhH_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-twk-sta1-evx-naming-intro] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-twk-sta1-evx-naming-intro] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

• Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

• Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.