Note
Draft status: MMv2-SocPsy (2026m04d05).
This is the psychological and social science presentation of the
e7Day model, written for psychologists, social scientists, and
behavioral researchers. Companion papers: b12-math (formal
derivations), b12-theophil (theological context), b12-syseng
(engineering applications), b12-intro (general readers).
Draft by Claude Opus 4.6 (dv_ClaOp46_MMv2_2026m04d05).
The e7Day Model: Self-Assessment, Compassion Capacity, and the Psychology of Self-Correction#
Abstract#
Why do individuals, organizations, and civilizations repeat the same self-destructive patterns? Why is honest self-assessment so difficult? Why does helping often fail, and why do heroes become villains?
This paper presents the e7Day model’s answers to these questions, drawn from a formal axiom system of 21 axioms and 9 theorems. The model identifies a self-assessment bifurcation at the heart of human behavior: when a person or group assesses itself as adequate (OK), self-correction stops and a self-reinforcing trap (BABL) is entered. When the assessment is adequate-but-incomplete (OKO), self-correction can continue — but requires perpetual effort.
The framework connects to established psychological theories at multiple points: Erikson’s 8 psychosocial stages [Erikson, 1950] share the model’s 8-stage structure with binary outcomes at each stage; Maslow’s hierarchy [Maslow, 1943] shares the cascading dependency; Kohlberg’s moral development [Kohlberg, 1971] parallels the transition from rule-following to general reasoning; Bloom’s cognitive taxonomy [Bloom et al., 1956] parallels the cascade from knowledge to evaluation; and Tuckman’s group stages [Tuckman, 1965] independently exhibit the same OKO tension at the “storming” phase.
The Compassion Capacity Theorem (th7) provides a five-gate model of why helping fails: even well-intentioned, experienced, aware helpers can fail if the communication channel is noisy (Gate 4) or if the helper has stopped growing (Gate 5). The “supervillain theorem” — a sub-result of Gate 5 — formalizes why former heroes become the most dangerous agents: high influence from past success combined with frozen expertise produces maximally harmful “friendly fire.”
1. Introduction: The Self-Assessment Paradox#
The Dunning-Kruger effect is well-established: individuals with low competence tend to overestimate their ability, while those with high competence tend to underestimate it. But the e7Day model proposes something stronger and more structural: the problem is not that incompetent people overestimate themselves. The problem is that any self-assessment of adequacy — regardless of actual competence — stops the self-correction process.
Consider:
An incompetent person who says “I’m fine” stops learning because they see no need to learn.
A competent person who says “I’m fine” stops adapting because they see no need to adapt.
An expert who says “I’ve mastered this” stops listening because they see no need to listen.
In each case, the mechanism is identical: the self-assessment of adequacy (OK) precludes the feedback loop required for error detection. The actual competence level is irrelevant. What matters is whether the agent’s self-model is open (OKO: “I am adequate but incomplete, and I must keep checking”) or closed (OK: “I am adequate, and no further checking is needed”).
The e7Day model formalizes this mechanism within a broader framework of system construction. The self-assessment bifurcation (m6.ax4) is one axiom in a system of 21, but it may be the most consequential for psychology: it predicts that self-destructive behavior originates not in external circumstances but in internal self-assessment.
1.1 The Model in Brief#
The e7Day model defines 8 construction stages (VOID through TRUST), each building on all prior stages. For psychologists, the stages map to developmental dimensions:
Stage |
Name |
Psychological Dimension |
|---|---|---|
m0 |
VOID |
Pre-differentiation. No categories, no self-other distinction. |
m1 |
TYPE |
First distinction: self vs. not-self. Scope of identity. |
m2 |
EQUAL |
The tension between uniqueness (indivisible individual) and fungibility (interchangeable role). Every person faces this: “Am I irreplaceable, or am I a role that anyone could fill?” Verdict: OKO. The tension is permanent. |
m3 |
VALUE |
Unconditional vs. conditional knowledge. What do I know for certain? What depends on context? |
m4 |
LOGIC |
Directed activity vs. reflective guidance. Conscious processing vs. unconscious pattern-matching. |
m5 |
CARE |
Self-managing, other-caring behavior. When noise overwhelms the caring channel, compassion collapses. |
m6 |
HOPE |
Self-assessment and agency. The OK/OKO bifurcation. |
m7 |
TRUST |
Consolidation, rest, integration. Without periodic rest, accumulated errors drive the person toward BABL. |
1.2 Connections to Existing Theories#
The e7Day model was developed independently of the psychological literature, making the convergences non-trivial:
Erikson [Erikson, 1950]: 8 stages, binary outcomes, cascading dependency
Maslow [Maslow, 1943]: hierarchy of needs as cascading dependency
Kohlberg [Kohlberg, 1971]: moral development as rule-following to principle-based reasoning
Bloom [Bloom et al., 1956]: cognitive objectives from knowledge to evaluation
Tuckman [Tuckman, 1965]: group development with OKO at “storming”
Each of these is examined in detail in the sections that follow.
2. The Erikson Parallel: Eight Stages with Binary Outcomes#
Erikson’s 8 psychosocial stages [Erikson, 1950] share three structural features with e7Day:
Eight stages (the same count as e7Day’s m0–m7)
Binary outcomes at each stage (positive vs. negative resolution, paralleling OK/OKO/KO)
Cascading dependency (“the results from each stage, whether positive or negative, influence the results of succeeding stages” — Erikson’s own words match mc.ax4 precisely)
The most compelling specific mappings:
2.1 Stage 7: Generativity vs. Stagnation = Gate 5#
Erikson’s Stage 7 (middle adulthood) presents the crisis of generativity vs. stagnation: the individual either continues contributing to the next generation (generativity) or becomes self-absorbed and stagnant.
This maps precisely to Gate 5 of the Compassion Capacity theorem (th7): an agent who stops expanding their scope of concern stagnates, and the resulting frozen expertise generates “friendly fire” at the boundaries of what they no longer understand. Erikson’s “stagnation” IS Gate 5 failure: the hero who stops cycling.
The parallel extends to the consequences: Erikson describes stagnation as producing self-absorbed rigidity. The e7Day supervillain theorem (Section 5.3 below) describes the same outcome in structural terms: high causal influence + frozen scope = maximally dangerous agent.
2.2 Stage 8: Integrity vs. Despair = BABL/ZION#
Erikson’s Stage 8 (late adulthood) presents the crisis of integrity vs. despair: the individual either achieves a coherent sense of life meaning (integrity) or falls into regret and bitterness (despair).
This maps to the BABL/ZION bifurcation. Integrity is the OKO resolution: “my life was imperfect but meaningful, and the imperfections were learning, not failure.” Despair is the OK resolution that failed: “I was supposed to be adequate, and I was not.” The person who expected OK and found OKO experiences despair; the person who expected OKO and found OKO experiences integrity.
2.3 Stage 1: Trust vs. Mistrust — Reversed Position#
A notable difference: Erikson places Trust at Stage 1 (infancy); e7Day places TRUST at Stage 7 (the final stage). This reversal reflects the difference between individual development (trust is learned first, in infancy, through the caregiver relationship) and system construction (trust is the final stage, the consolidation that caps the construction). Both are correct for their respective domains: the child must trust before it can develop; the system must be complete before it can rest.
3. The Maslow Parallel: Cascading Dependency#
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs [Maslow, 1943] is the most widely recognized cascading-dependency model in psychology. The structural parallel to the WoLC is direct:
Maslow Level |
WoLC Stage |
Correspondence |
|---|---|---|
Physiological |
BASE/LIFE |
Physical survival as foundational prerequisite |
Safety |
TYPE (m1) |
Defining what is safe (in-scope) vs. unsafe (out-of-scope) |
Love/Belonging |
CARE (m5) |
Caring relationships, social bonds |
Esteem |
HOPE (m6) |
Self-assessment, self-worth, recognition by others |
Self-actualization |
ZION cycle |
Perpetual growth and realization of potential |
Self-transcendence |
th7 Gate 5 |
Perpetual scope-expansion beyond the self (added 1969) |
Maslow’s later addition of self-transcendence (1969) strengthens the parallel: the need to grow beyond one’s current scope, perpetually, is precisely Gate 5 of the Compassion Capacity theorem. An agent that self-actualizes (reaches the top of the personal hierarchy) but does not self-transcend (expand scope beyond the self) becomes stagnant — Erikson’s Stage 7 failure, Gate 5 failure, the supervillain theorem.
4. The Self-Assessment Bifurcation#
4.1 The Formal Structure#
The e7Day model’s axiom m6.ax4 states:
OK self-assessment → BABL (sufficient; self-reinforcing)
ZION → OKO self-assessment (necessary; not sufficient)
In psychological terms: any person or group that declares “I am adequate / we are adequate” stops the self-correction feedback loop. The declaration does not need to be explicit; it can be implicit in behavior (not seeking feedback, not questioning assumptions, not testing one’s own conclusions).
4.2 Connection to Dunning-Kruger and Cognitive Dissonance#
Dunning-Kruger describes a specific instance of the OK/OKO mechanism: low-competence individuals lack the metacognitive skill to detect their own incompetence, producing OK self-assessment by default. The e7Day model generalizes this: any self-assessment of OK, at any competence level, produces the same structural consequence (BABL). Dunning-Kruger is the low-competence special case; the expert who stops learning is the high-competence special case. The mechanism is identical.
Cognitive dissonance (Festinger, 1957) describes the discomfort of holding conflicting beliefs. In the e7Day framework, OKO self-assessment IS a state of productive cognitive dissonance: “I am adequate AND incomplete.” The discomfort is not a bug; it is the driver of self-correction. Agents who resolve the dissonance by dropping the “incomplete” part (returning to OK) enter BABL. Agents who sustain the dissonance (maintaining OKO) remain in the ZION prerequisite.
The cost asymmetry is existentially significant:
False OK (claiming adequacy when inadequate): catastrophic, self-concealing. The agent cannot detect the error because the error disables error-detection.
False NOT-OK (claiming inadequacy when adequate): harmless, self-correcting. The agent continues checking and eventually discovers its actual competence.
This asymmetry explains why humility is a better default than confidence: the worst case of humility (unnecessary effort) is self-correcting, while the worst case of confidence (undetected incompetence) is self-concealing.
For the formal derivation, see b12-math, Sections 2.8 and 3.2 (th3).
4.3 The BABL Trap in Group Dynamics#
The self-assessment bifurcation applies to groups as well as individuals. A group that develops a collective identity of adequacy (“we are the best team,” “our culture is superior,” “our methodology is correct”) enters collective BABL:
Groupthink (Janis, 1972) is collective OK self-assessment: the group’s self-image suppresses dissent, creating an illusion of unanimity.
Institutional capture is organizational BABL: the institution’s processes become optimized for self-perpetuation rather than for the mission they were designed to serve.
Cultural narcissism is civilizational BABL: a civilization’s self-image prevents it from recognizing the conditions under which it will fail.
In each case, the mechanism is the same: OK self-assessment → no self-correction → OSCR collapse (over-simplify, over-complicate, over-reach).
5. The Compassion Capacity Theorem#
Theorem th7 is the most practically consequential result for psychology and social work. It formalizes why helping often fails and what structural conditions must be met for compassionate assistance to be effective.
5.1 Gate 1: You Can Only Help with What You Have Survived#
An agent without repair-history for a given fault class cannot provide informed assistance for that fault class. OKO self-assessment generates repair-history (because the agent acknowledges faults and repairs them). OK self-assessment does not (because the agent denies faults exist).
Psychological implication: Therapists, counselors, mentors, and support workers are more effective in domains where they have personal experience of difficulty and recovery. Not because suffering is inherently ennobling, but because repair-history provides the repair procedure. An agent who has never navigated depression cannot provide informed guidance for navigating depression — they can only provide generic advice, which optimizes for the wrong objective (Gate 3).
5.2 Gate 2: Your Compassion Has Boundaries#
At any given time, a finite agent’s compassion scope is bounded by their repair-history, which is a proper subset of all possible problems. This creates in-group/out-group boundaries wherever experiential data runs out.
Psychological implication: Compassion fatigue is not a moral failure; it is a scope limitation. A social worker who specializes in addiction has limited scope for helping with grief, and vice versa. Acknowledging scope boundaries is not weakness; it is structural honesty (OKO).
The PERFECT/PERFIDE tension manifests here: do you prioritize depth within your existing scope (PERFECT — serve fewer people better) or breadth across more fault classes (PERFIDE — serve more people less deeply)? The trade-off is permanent.
5.3 Gate 5: The Supervillain Theorem#
Gate 5 is the most psychologically striking result:
An agent who stops expanding their compassion scope becomes, eventually, a supervillain.
The mechanism:
The agent achieves significant influence through past cycles of growth (the “hero” phase).
The agent stops cycling (stops learning, stops listening, stops engaging with novel contexts).
Their scope freezes at the level it was when cycling stopped.
Novel situations arise outside the frozen scope.
The agent applies their large influence (from prior success) to situations they no longer understand.
The result is “friendly fire” — confidently wrong intervention at the boundaries of frozen expertise.
Psychological examples:
The activist who fought for justice in one context and now applies the same tactics to a different context where they are counterproductive.
The parent who raised one child successfully and insists the same approach works for a child with fundamentally different needs.
The leader who built a company and cannot adapt when the market shifts because “I know how to do this.”
The therapist who mastered one modality and dismisses all others.
In each case, the agent is not malicious. They are frozen — still operating from a once-valid but now-outdated map. The combination of high influence (from past success) and outdated scope (from stopped cycling) makes them maximally dangerous precisely because their track record gives them credibility.
The dictator pattern: Dictators often gain power as heroes — individuals who genuinely solved a crisis. The transition from hero to tyrant is Gate 5 failure: the hero stops listening (stops cycling), their scope freezes, and their accumulated power becomes a weapon against the people it was meant to serve.
The ASON trap: “Nothing” is ambiguous. An agent who believes they have fully understood “nothing” — fully understood humility, fully understood beginner’s mind — has fallen into ASON (Ambiguous Semantics Of Nothing). The only way to navigate ASON is perpetual openness to not-knowing: “I know that I know not” (Socrates), “Blessed are the poor in spirit” (Mt. 5:3).
5.4 The Eternal-Life Corollary#
If the conditions requiring the Hero Journey (the perpetual growth cycle from e7He, paper a3 forthcoming) persist indefinitely, then the only viable model of long-term flourishing is perpetual cycling — perpetual growth, perpetual learning, perpetual expansion of scope.
“Arrived” — whether conceived as retirement, enlightenment, or salvation — is formally indistinguishable from deadlock. Any conception of flourishing that terminates at a fixed state violates Gate 5 and, by the supervillain theorem, eventually produces harm.
This has implications for:
Retirement: A model of retirement as “arrival” (no more growth needed) predicts Erikson’s Stage 8 despair. A model of retirement as “new cycling” (growth in new domains) predicts integrity.
Therapy endpoints: “Cured” (OK) vs. “managing well” (OKO). The OKO model predicts better long-term outcomes because it maintains the self-correction feedback loop.
Educational goals: “Mastery” (OK) vs. “expertise-in-development” (OKO). Bloom’s revised taxonomy [Bloom et al., 1956] places “Create” (perpetual generation of novelty) above “Evaluate” (judgment) — consistent with Gate 5’s requirement for perpetual expansion.
6. The Kohlberg and Bloom Parallels#
6.1 Kohlberg: From Rule-Following to General Reasoning#
Kohlberg’s three levels [Kohlberg, 1971] map to the WoLC’s middle stages:
Pre-conventional (punishment/reward) → VALUE (m3): operating on given values without questioning them
Conventional (conformity/law-and-order) → LOGIC (m4): following rules and processes
Post-conventional (universal principles) → HOPE (m6): reasoning from principles beyond any specific rule set — general moral intelligence
The transition from conventional to post-conventional morality is the transition from special-purpose rule-following (m4, LOGIC) to general-purpose reasoning (m6, HOPE). Kohlberg’s highest stage (universal ethical principles) requires exactly the kind of general intelligence that Balospe (m6.ax2) provides: the ability to navigate novel PERFECT/PERFIDE trade-offs that no existing rule covers.
6.2 Bloom: The Cognitive Cascade#
Bloom’s original taxonomy [Bloom et al., 1956] (Knowledge → Comprehension → Application → Analysis → Synthesis → Evaluation) is a 6-level cognitive cascade where each level builds on prior levels.
The most significant mapping: Evaluation at the top parallels HOPE (m6) as the self-assessment stage. The 2001 revision placed Create above Evaluate — paralleling TRUST (m7) as the stage where new construction cycles begin (the 6+1 periodicity: after evaluation, create anew).
7. The Tuckman Parallel: Storming = EQUAL#
Tuckman’s group development stages [Tuckman, 1965] provide the most precise single-stage mapping found in this research:
Storming is EQUAL (m2). During the storming phase, the team has been formed (scope defined, Stage 1) but now conflicts over fundamental trade-offs: roles, responsibilities, approaches, priorities. There is no consensus. The tension is inherent, not caused by bad behavior.
Critically: Storming has no “it was good” verdict. Groups do not celebrate the storming phase. They endure it. This parallels Genesis 1’s missing verdict for Day 2 and e7Day’s OKO verdict for EQUAL.
Groups that skip storming (pretend everyone agrees) enter collective BABL: the unresolved tensions persist beneath the surface and eventually erupt as OSCR collapse.
The engineering parallel (Tuckman’s “adjourning” = TRUST’s rest) is developed in the companion paper b12-syseng, Section 2.8.
8. Discussion and Future Work#
The EQUAL tension in relationships. The PERFECT/PERFIDE dichotomy manifests in every close relationship: do you preserve the other person’s uniqueness (PERFECT: accept them as they are) or optimize for compatibility (PERFIDE: expect them to adapt)? The model predicts that no stable resolution exists — only perpetual negotiation (OKO).
The Hero Journey as therapeutic model. The e7He model (paper a3, forthcoming) applies the e7Day architecture to individual growth. Gate 5 of the Compassion Capacity theorem predicts that perpetual Hero Journey cycling is necessary for sustained well-being — a testable hypothesis against longitudinal data on life satisfaction.
Compassion Capacity as clinical tool. The five-gate model could be operationalized as an assessment instrument: for any proposed intervention, check whether all five gates are satisfied. If not, identify which gate is failing and address it before proceeding.
9. Conclusion#
The e7Day model offers psychology and social science a structural account of self-correction failure. The central finding — that self-destructive behavior originates in self-assessment, not in external circumstances — connects to Dunning-Kruger, cognitive dissonance, groupthink, and the hero-to-tyrant transition.
The Compassion Capacity theorem provides a five-gate model for why helping fails. The gates are testable: repair-history (Gate 1), scope boundaries (Gate 2), other-awareness (Gate 3), channel quality (Gate 4), and perpetual scope-expansion (Gate 5). The supervillain theorem — heroes who stop growing become the most dangerous agents — is a structural prediction about influence decay that could be tested against biographical and historical data.
The convergence with Erikson (8 stages, binary outcomes), Maslow (cascading dependency), Kohlberg (rule-following to general reasoning), Bloom (cognitive cascade with evaluation at top), and Tuckman (OKO at storming) suggests that these independent theories are windows into the same underlying structure.
The system is designed to be tested against psychological data.
#AuditTheMath
References#
al-Ghazali, A. H. (n.d.). The Niche of Lights (Mishkat al-Anwar).
Aquinas, T. (n.d.). Summa Theologica, Part I, Questions 3–11.
Arkhipov, V. A. (1997). Address at the Conference on the Cuban Missile Crisis, Moscow, 14 October 1997. National Security Archive Briefing Book No. 808, document 1, published 3 October 2022. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/29078-document-1-vice-admiral-vasili-arkhipov.
Arrow, K. J. (1971). Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.
Asadi, S., Cappa, C. D., Barreda, S., Wexler, A. S., Bouvier, N. M., & Ristenpart, W. D. (2020). Efficacy of masks and face coverings in controlling outward aerosol particle emission from expiratory activities. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 15665. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72798-7, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72798-7
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. a minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718, doi:10.1037/h0093718
Ashby, W. R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall.
Barrett, A. M., Baum, S. D., & Hostetler, K. (2013). Analyzing and reducing the risks of inadvertent nuclear war between the United States and Russia. Science & Global Security, 21(2), 106–133. URL: https://scienceandglobalsecurity.org/archive/sgs21barrett.pdf, doi:10.1080/08929882.2013.798984
Barrett, A. M., Baum, S. D., & Hostetler, K. (2013). Appendix and supplement to “Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War between the United States and Russia”. Science & Global Security, 21(2). Online appendix to Barrett, Baum, and Hostetler (2013). URL: https://scienceandglobalsecurity.org/archive/sgs21barrett_app.pdf
Baum, S. D. (2018). Garrick, B. J. (Ed.). Reflections on the risk analysis of nuclear war. Proceedings of the Workshop on Quantifying Global Catastrophic Risks (pp. 19–50). Los Angeles, CA: Garrick Institute for the Risk Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles. https://gcri.org/publications/research/reflections-risk-analysis-nuclear-war.
Baum, S. D., de Neufville, R., & Barrett, A. M. (2018). A Model for the Probability of Nuclear War. Global Catastrophic Risk Institute. Working Paper 18-1, 8 March 2018. https://gcri.org/publications/research/model-probability-nuclear-war/.
Beddington, J., Cooper, C. L., Field, J., Goswami, U., Huppert, F. A., Jenkins, R., … Thomas, S. M. (2008). The mental wealth of nations. Nature, 455(7216), 1057–1060. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/4551057a, doi:10.1038/4551057a
Benci, V., & Di Nasso, M. (2003). Numerosities of labelled sets: a new way of counting. Advances in Mathematics, 173(1), 50–67. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-8708(02)00012-9, doi:10.1016/s0001-8708(02)00012-9
Bernal, J. D. (1929). The World, the Flesh and the Devil: An Enquiry into the Future of the Three Enemies of the Rational Soul. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
Beyer, B., Jones, C., Petoff, J., & Murphy, N. R. (2016). Site Reliability Engineering: How Google Runs Production Systems. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
Bezos, J. (2019). Going to Space to Benefit Earth. Blue Origin press event titled "Going to Space to Benefit Earth", 2019-05-09, Washington, D.C. ; https://web.archive.org/web/20190511092421/https://www.blueorigin.com/news/going-to-space-to-benefit-earth-full-event-replay ; https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/01/jeff-bezos-dreams-of-a-world-with-a-trillion-people-living-in-space.html ; https://www.reggaemath.org/news/2017/6/18/there-are-1000-potential-einsteins-and-mozarts-with-us-now.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Brower, J. E. (2008). Making sense of divine simplicity. Faith and Philosophy, 25(1), 3–30. URL: https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil20082511, doi:10.5840/faithphil20082511
Burr, W., & Blanton, T. S. (2002). The Submarines of October: U.S. and Soviet Naval Encounters During the Cuban Missile Crisis. National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 75, 31 October 2002. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB75/.
Caplan, Y., Stewart, N., Smittenaar, P., & Sgaier, S. K. (2020). Fighting COVID-19's disproportionate impact on black communities with more precise data. Stanford Social Innovation Review. URL: https://doi.org/10.48558/4AZM-XX64
Clayton, P., & Peacocke, A. (Eds.) (2004). In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God's Presence in a Scientific World. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Cooper, J. W. (2006). Panentheism: The Other God of the Philosophers — From Plato to the Present. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.
Coupe, J., Bardeen, C. G., Robock, A., & Toon, O. B. (2019). Nuclear winter responses to nuclear war between the united states and russia in the whole atmosphere community climate model version 4 and the goddard institute for space studies modele. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 124(15), 8522–8543. URL: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030509, doi:10.1029/2019JD030509
Davey, T. (2017). 55 Years After Preventing Nuclear Attack, Arkhipov Honored With Inaugural Future of Life Award. Future of Life Institute, 27 October 2017. https://futureoflife.org/2017/10/27/55-years-preventing-nuclear-attack-arkhipov-honored-inaugural-future-life-award/.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
Diaz-Maurin, F., & Mecklin, J. (2026). AI for peace: in Rome, Nobel laureates call for disarming AI and nuclear weapons. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 17 July 2026. Available at https://thebulletin.org/2026/07/ai-for-peace-in-rome-nobel-laureates-call-for-disarming-ai-and-nuclear-weapons/. Reports the Global Nobel Laureates Assembly on Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear War, convened at the Vatican (Castel Gandolfo), 14–16 July 2026. URL: https://thebulletin.org/2026/07/ai-for-peace-in-rome-nobel-laureates-call-for-disarming-ai-and-nuclear-weapons/
Ehlert, K., & Loewe, L. (2014). Lazy updating of hubs can enable more realistic models by speeding up stochastic simulations. Journal of Chemical Physics, 141(20), 204109. URL: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4901114, doi:10.1063/1.4901114
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. Th., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363, doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
Evans, D. J. (2005). The elasticity of marginal utility of consumption: estimates for 20 OECD countries. Fiscal Studies, 26(2), 197–224. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2005.00010.x, doi:10.1111/j.1475-5890.2005.00010.x
Ferguson, N. M., Laydon, D., Nedjati-Gilani, G., Imai, N., Ainslie, K., Baguelin, M., … Ghani, A. C. (2020). Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand. Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team. Published 2020-03-16. Imperial College London Report 9; https://doi.org/10.25561/77482.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Giordano, G., Blanchini, F., Bruno, R., Colaneri, P., Di Filippo, A., Di Matteo, A., & Colaneri, M. (2020). Modelling the COVID-19 epidemic and implementation of population-wide interventions in Italy. Nature Medicine, 26(6), 855–860. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0883-7, doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0883-7
Gould, E., & Wilson, V. (2020). Black Workers Face Two of the Most Lethal Preexisting Conditions for Coronavirus—Racism and Economic Inequality. https://web.archive.org/web/20201216082617/https://files.epi.org/pdf/193246.pdf.
Groom, B., & Maddison, D. (2019). New estimates of the elasticity of marginal utility for the UK. Environmental and Resource Economics, 72(4), 1155–1182. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0242-z, doi:10.1007/s10640-018-0242-z
Grossman, M. (1983). Bigeometric Calculus: A System with a Scale-Free Derivative. Rockport, Massachusetts: Archimedes Foundation. Develops the bigeometric calculus, a multiplicative calculus whose derivative is invariant under changes of scale — a natural language for multiplicative (exponential) growth.
Grossman, M., & Katz, R. (1972). Non-Newtonian Calculus. Pigeon Cove, Massachusetts: Lee Press. An early systematic treatment of multiplicative (non-Newtonian) calculi, in which products and ratios play the structural role that sums and differences play in ordinary calculus.
Gödel, K. (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38, 173–198. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01700692, doi:10.1007/BF01700692
Gödel, K. (1970). Ontological Proof.
Hare, B. (2017). Survival of the Friendliest: Homo sapiens Evolved via Selection for Prosociality. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 155–186. URL: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044201, doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044201
Hare, B., & Woods, V. (2020). Survival of the Friendliest: Understanding Our Origins and Rediscovering Our Common Humanity. New York: Random House.
Hartshorne, C. (1941). Man's Vision of God and the Logic of Theism. Chicago/New York: Willett, Clark & Company.
Hartshorne, C. (1948). The Divine Relativity: A Social Conception of God. New Haven: Yale University Press.
missing publisher in Hegel1812
Hellman, M. E. (2008). Risk analysis of nuclear deterrence. The Bent of Tau Beta Pi, 99(2), 14–22. URL: https://www.tbp.org/pubs/Features/Sp08Hellman.pdf
Hellman, M. E. (2021). Scouras, J. (Ed.). Probabilistic risk assessment. On Assessing the Risk of Nuclear War (pp. 85–126). Laurel, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Chapter 4. https://www.jhuapl.edu/sites/default/files/2022-12/Ch4_Hellman.pdf.
Heschel, A. J. (1951). The Sabbath: Its Meaning for Modern Man. New York: Farrar, Straus and Young.
Hick, J. (1966). Evil and the God of Love. London: Macmillan.
Hindmarsh, A. C., Brown, P. N., Grant, K. E., Lee, S. L., Serban, R., Shumaker, D. E., & Woodward, C. S. (2005). SUNDIALS: suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 31(3), 363–396. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1089014.1089020, doi:10.1145/1089014.1089020
Howard, R. A. (1966). Information value theory. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 2(1), 22–26. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSC.1966.300074, doi:10.1109/TSSC.1966.300074
Jack, D. C., & Dill, D. (1992). The silencing the self scale: schemas of intimacy associated with depression in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16(1), 97–106. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00242.x, doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00242.x
Jacobsen, A. (2024). Nuclear War: A Scenario. New York: Dutton.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Kahn, H. (1965). On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios. New York: Frederick A. Praeger. Frederick A. Praeger, New York, 1965 (xvii + 308 pp.). Borrowable scan at https://archive.org/details/onescalationmeta0000kahn; Taylor & Francis reissue at https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315125565/escalation-herman-kahn.
Kemp, L. (2025). Goliath's Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse. New York: Knopf.
Kermack, W. O., & McKendrick, A. G. (1927). A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 115(772), 700–721. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0118, doi:10.1098/rspa.1927.0118
Ketov, R. A. (2012). Naumov, V. V. (Ed.). Vospominaniya byvshego komandira podvodnoi lodki B-4 o pokhode B-4 v period Karibskogo krizisa [Recollections of the former commander of submarine B-4 on B-4's voyage during the Caribbean Crisis]. Karibskii krizis. Protivostoyanie. Sbornik vospominanii uchastnikov sobytii 1962 goda. Nika-Profi. In Russian. Online serialization, Parts 9–10: https://vnmazurenko.blogspot.com/2013/01/1962-9.html.
Kissler, S. M., Tedijanto, C., Goldstein, E., Grad, Y. H., & Lipsitch, M. (2020). Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period. Science, 368(6493), 860–868. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb5793, doi:10.1126/science.abb5793
Kitcher, P. (1981). Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science, 48(4), 507–531. URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/289019, doi:10.1086/289019
Kohlberg, L. (1971). Beck, C. M., Crittenden, B. S., & Sullivan, E. V. (Eds.). Stages of moral development as a basis for moral education. Moral Education: Interdisciplinary Approaches (pp. 23–92). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Komarov, M. P. (2022). Podvodniki v Karibskom krizise [Submariners in the Caribbean Crisis]. In Russian. PDF posted by the National Security Archive, 3 October 2022; also online, undated, at https://submarinersclub.ru/books/podvodniki_v_karibskom_krizise/.
Korda, M., Johns, E., Knight-Boyle, M., & Kristensen, H. M. (2026 , February). The Aftermath: The Expiration of New START and What It Means For Us All. Federation of American Scientists.
Kripke, S. A. (1963). Semantical considerations on modal logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 16, 83–94. URL: http://saulkripkecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Semantical-Considerations-on-Modal-Logic-PUBLIC.pdf
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review, 103(2), 263–283. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263, doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263
Lawvere, F. W. (1973). Metric spaces, generalized logic, and closed categories. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico e Fisico di Milano, 43, 135–166. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02924844, doi:10.1007/BF02924844
Lazarus, R. J. (2009). Super wicked problems and climate change: restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94(5), 1153–1234. URL: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol94/iss5/8/
missing publisher in Leibniz1710
Leonenko, A. V. (2012). Naumov, V. V. (Ed.). Vospominaniya byvshego komandira BCh-3 podvodnoi lodki B-59 o pokhode na Kubu: Kamikadze SSSR [Recollections of the former commander of the mine-torpedo department of submarine B-59 on the voyage to Cuba: “Kamikazes of the USSR”]. Karibskii krizis. Protivostoyanie. Sbornik vospominanii uchastnikov sobytii 1962 goda. Nika-Profi. In Russian. Online serialization, Part 28–29: https://vnmazurenko.blogspot.com/2013/01/1962-28-29.html. The night episode is also quoted in full in Komarov (2022), p. 175.
Leveson, N. G. (2011). Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0, doi:10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
Lewis, P., Williams, H., Pelopidas, B., & Aghlani, S. (2014). Too Close for Comfort: Cases of Near Nuclear Use and Options for Policy. Chatham House (The Royal Institute of International Affairs). Chatham House Report, April 2014. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2014/04/too-close-comfort-cases-near-nuclear-use-and-options-policy.
Liang, X., Tian, N., Lopes da Silva, D., Scarazzato, L., Karim, Z. A., & Guiberteau Ricard, J. (2025 , 4). Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2024. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). SIPRI Fact Sheet, April 2025. Available at https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2025-04/2504_fs_milex_2024.pdf.
Loewe, L. (2006). Quantifying the genomic decay paradox due to Muller's ratchet in human mitochondrial DNA. Genetical Research, 87(2), 133–159. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672306008123, doi:10.1017/S0016672306008123
Loewe, L., Scheuer, K. S., Keel, S. A., & others. (2017). Evolvix BEST names for semantic reproducibility across code2brain interfaces. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1387(1), 124–144. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13192, doi:10.1111/nyas.13192
Loewe, L., & EvoSysBio Group at UW-Madison (2015–2026). Prototype Evolvix: A Domain-Specific Language and Compiler to Simplify Accurate Mass-Action Modeling in Biology — Simulating Systems where Parts randomly meet to trigger Actions at defined Rates. Software, pre-compiled binaries for Mac OS X 10, Windows 7, Ubuntu 14, Fedora 21, RHEL 7. Original release label: Evolvix_CL_0.3.1_RC1, built 2015m03d11; binaries compiled 2015-03-09 from source-tree commit 6e355803bc6fff5b125ef4bf1be1f8e980f364be. License: CC BY 4.0. Zenodo deposit https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19679456; Balospe.com mirror: https://balospe.com/en/good-news-pack/vv/mmv3/flyingscroll/transwarpkey/sta1-evx/evx-prototype-compiler.html.
Loewe, L. (LLoL) (2026). PET Axioms — Discussions and Caveats.
Loewe, L. (LLoL) (2026). PET Axioms ax1–ax14: Formal Panentheism.
Loewe, L. (LLoL) (2026). PET Theorems th1–th4.
Lucanus, M. A. (n.d.). Pharsalia (De Bello Civili), Book I, line 81.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mallet, J. (2012). The struggle for existence: how the notion of carrying capacity, k, obscures the links between demography, Darwinian evolution, and speciation. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 14, 627–665. URL: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/30212075
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551–558. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023281, doi:10.1037/h0023281
Martin-Löf, P. (1984). Intuitionistic Type Theory. Naples: Bibliopolis.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346, doi:10.1037/h0054346
McCollum, J. M., Peterson, G. D., Cox, C. D., Simpson, M. L., & Samatova, N. F. (2006). The sorting direct method for stochastic simulation of biochemical systems with varying reaction execution behavior. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 30(1), 39–49. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2005.10.007, doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2005.10.007
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Wright, D. (Ed.). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Meyerowitz-Katz, G., & Merone, L. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of published research data on COVID-19 infection fatality rates. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 101, 138–148. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1464, doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1464
Mikhailov, V. A. (2012). Naumov, V. V. (Ed.). Vospominaniya byvshego komandira rulevoi gruppy shturmanskoi boevoi chasti podvodnoi lodki B-59 o pokhode na Kubu [Recollections of the former commander of the helmsman group of the navigation department of submarine B-59 on the voyage to Cuba]. Karibskii krizis. Protivostoyanie. Sbornik vospominanii uchastnikov sobytii 1962 goda. Nika-Profi. In Russian. Online serialization, Parts 28–29 and 30–31: https://vnmazurenko.blogspot.com/2013/02/1962-30-31.html.
Mills, M. J., Toon, O. B., Lee-Taylor, J., & Robock, A. (2014). Multidecadal global cooling and unprecedented ozone loss following a regional nuclear conflict. Earth's Future, 2(4), 161–176. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EF000205, doi:10.1002/2013EF000205
Moltmann, J. (1981). The Trinity and the Kingdom: The Doctrine of God. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Mosley, T. J., Zajdel, R. A., Alderete, E., Clayton, J. A., Heidari, S., Pérez-Stable, E. J., … Bernard, M. A. (2025). Intersectionality and diversity, equity, and inclusion in the healthcare and scientific workforces. Lancet Regional Health — Americas, 41, 100973. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2024.100973, doi:10.1016/j.lana.2024.100973
Mullins, R. T. (2013). Simply impossible: a case against divine simplicity. Journal of Reformed Theology, 7(2), 181–203. URL: https://doi.org/10.1163/15697312-12341294, doi:10.1163/15697312-12341294
of Hippo, A. (n.d.). City of God (De Civitate Dei), Books XI–XII.
of Hippo, A. (n.d.). Confessions, Book VII.
Olah, C. (2026 , May). Remarks on Pope Leo XIV's Encyclical "Magnifica Humanitas". Available at https://www.anthropic.com/news/chris-olah-pope-leo-encyclical.
Oppy, G. (2006). Arguing about Gods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ord, T. (2020). The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. London: Bloomsbury.
Orlov, V. (2002). Recollections of Vadim Orlov (USSR Submarine B-59): “We Will Sink Them All, But We Will Not Disgrace Our Navy”. National Security Archive document 29066, released with Electronic Briefing Book No. 75, 31 October 2002. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/29066-7-recollections-vadim-orlov-ussr-submarine-b-59-we-will-sink-them-all-we-will-not.
Ottati, V., Price, E., Wilson, C., & Sumaktoyo, N. (2015). When self-perceptions of expertise increase closed-minded cognition: the earned dogmatism effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 131–138. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.08.003, doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.08.003
Parkinson, C. N. (1957). Parkinson's Law, and Other Studies in Administration. London: John Murray.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.
Plantinga, A. (1974). God, Freedom, and Evil. New York: Harper & Row.
Plantinga, A. (1974). The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pratt, J. W. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32(1/2), 122–136. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913738, doi:10.2307/1913738
Radchenko, S. (2024). `Closer now than ever': Historian Sergey Radchenko assesses Tucker Carlson's claim that U.S.-Russian tensions in Ukraine risk nuclear war more than the Cuban Missile Crisis. \emph Meduza, 4 December 2024. https://meduza.io/en/feature/2024/12/04/closer-now-than-ever.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730, doi:10.1007/BF01405730
Robock, A. (1984). Snow and ice feedbacks prolong effects of nuclear winter. Nature, 310(5979), 667–670. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/310667a0, doi:10.1038/310667a0
Robock, A., Oman, L., & Stenchikov, G. L. (2007). Nuclear winter revisited with a modern climate model and current nuclear arsenals: still catastrophic consequences. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 112(D13), D13107. URL: https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008235, doi:10.1029/2006JD008235
Savranskaya, S. V. (2005). New sources on the role of Soviet submarines in the Cuban Missile Crisis. Journal of Strategic Studies, 28(2), 233–259. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390500088312, doi:10.1080/01402390500088312
Savranskaya, S. V. (2022). The Underwater Cuban Missile Crisis at 60. National Security Archive Briefing Book No. 808, 3 October 2022. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2022-10-03/soviet-submarines-nuclear-torpedoes-cuban-missile-crisis.
Schelling, T. C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3 & 4), 379–423, 623–656. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x, doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Simons, P. (1987). Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sobel, J. H. (2004). Logic and Theism: Arguments For and Against Beliefs in God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, S. M. (2012). The Cuban Missile Crisis in American Memory: Myths versus Reality. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Stanford Nuclear Age Series. Stanford University Press, 2012 (viii + 196 pp.).
Stutt, R. O. J. H., Retkute, R., Bradley, M., Gilligan, C. A., & Colvin, J. (2020). A modelling framework to assess the likely effectiveness of facemasks in combination with `lock-down' in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 476(2238), 20200376. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2020.0376, doi:10.1098/rspa.2020.0376
Taleb, N. N., Read, R., Douady, R., Norman, J., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2014). The Precautionary Principle (with Application to the Genetic Modification of Organisms). arXiv:1410.5787 [q-fin.GN], latest version 17 October 2014. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.5787.
Talic, S., Shah, S., Wild, H., Gasevic, D., Maharaj, A., Ademi, Z., … Ilic, D. (2021). Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and COVID-19 mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 375, e068302. URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068302, doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-068302
Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 354–365. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023779, doi:10.1037/a0023779
Tertrais, B. (2017). “On The Brink”—really? Revisiting nuclear close calls since 1945. The Washington Quarterly, 40(2), 51–66. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2017.1328922, doi:10.1080/0163660X.2017.1328922
Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100, doi:10.1037/h0022100
Varzi, A. C. (2016). Mereology.
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Voorhees, T. (2023). The Cuban Missile Crisis at sea—avoidance of nuclear war not left to chance. Naval War College Review, 76(2), 107–146. URL: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol76/iss2/8/
Wasserman, D., van der Gaag, R., & Wise, J. (2020). The term “physical distancing” is recommended rather than “social distancing” during the COVID-19 pandemic for reducing feelings of rejection among people with mental health problems. European Psychiatry, 63(1), e52. URL: https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.60, doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.60
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Macmillan.
Wilde, R. (2018). Joseph Stalin's Death—He Did Not Escape the Consequences of His Actions. https://web.archive.org/web/20201204150340/https://www.thoughtco.com/how-did-stalin-die-1221206.
Wilson, E. (2012). Thank you Vasili Arkhipov, the man who stopped nuclear war. \emph The Guardian, 27 October 2012. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/oct/27/vasili-arkhipov-stopped-nuclear-war.
Wink, W. (1984). Naming the Powers: The Language of Power in the New Testament. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
Wintour, P. (2020-07-16). Covid-19 will devastate poorest nations if West does not act, warns UN: G20 told to “step up now or pay price later”. The Guardian. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/16/covid-19-may-devastate-poorest-nations-if-west-does-not-act-warns-un
Wurth, R. C., Braxton, M. L., & Cohen, C. L. (2020-06-29). Racism and Covid-19 threaten our health—We can't fight them as separate battles. The Guardian. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jun/29/racism-coronavirus-covid-19-black-brown-america
Xia, L., Robock, A., Scherrer, K., Harrison, C. S., Bodirsky, B. L., Weindl, I., … Heneghan, R. (2022). Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear war soot injection. Nature Food, 3(8), 586–596. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00573-0, doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00573-0
Anthropic (2026 , February). Claude Opus 4.6 System Card. Anthropic.
Anthropic (2026 , April). Claude Opus 4.7 System Card. Anthropic.
Balospe.com (2026). Formal Foundation Test for the e7Day Axiom System.
Bhikkhu Bodhi. (2000). The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Samyutta Nikaya. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1985). Handelsgesetzbuch § 252 Absatz 1 Nummer 4: Allgemeine Bewertungsgrundsätze. Official consolidated text at https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/hgb/__252.html. The provision reads, in part: “Es ist vorsichtig zu bewerten, namentlich sind alle vorhersehbaren Risiken und Verluste … zu berücksichtigen …; Gewinne sind nur zu berücksichtigen, wenn sie am Abschlußstichtag realisiert sind.”.
Gregory of Nyssa (n.d.). Life of Moses (De Vita Moysis). Written ca. 390 CE. Translation: Abraham J. Malherbe and Everett Ferguson (Paulist Press, 1978), Classics of Western Spirituality series; preface by John Meyendorff. Alt URL: https://archive.org/details/lifeofmoses0000greg.
Guinness World Records (2013). Deadliest Place to Travel by Road. Guinness World Records, "Deadliest place to travel by road": Libya, 73.4 road-traffic deaths per 100,000 (2013), citing the WHO Global Status Report on Road Safety 2015. Available at https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/deadliest-place-to-travel-by-road.
International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (2024). The Holy See and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Available at https://www.icanw.org/holy_see.
International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (2026). The Expiration of New START: What It Means and What's Next. Available at https://www.icanw.org/new_start_expiration.
John of Ephesus, & Pearse, R. (543CE, 2017). John of Ephesus Describes the Justinianic Plague. https://web.archive.org/web/20210306031539/https://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/2017/05/10/john-of-ephesus-describes-the-justinianic-plague/.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2025). SD4 — Prophetic Geometry of 2nd Exodus from BABL to ZION. https://balospe.com/en/good-news-pack/vv/mmv3/supporting-doc/sd4/.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). Matheo-b11: PET, the Pan-En-Theism Model — 14 Panentheistic Axioms Checked Against Seven Traditions. https://balospe.com/en/study/matheo/b11/.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). Matheo-b11: PET, the Pan-En-Theism Model — 14 Panentheistic Axioms Checked Against Seven Traditions.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). Matheo-b12: e7Day, the Self-Correcting Construction Axiom System. https://balospe.com/en/study/matheo/b12/.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). Matheo-b13: e7He, the Perpetual Hero Journey. https://balospe.com/en/study/matheo/b13/.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). Matheo-b14: JUB, Innovation Theodicy & the Jubilee Economy. https://balospe.com/en/study/matheo/b14/.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). Matheo-b14: JUB, Innovation Theodicy & the Jubilee Economy.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). Matheo-b15: The Divine-Simplicity Deadlock. https://balospe.com/en/study/matheo/b15/.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). Matheo-b16: RiskyMAD, the Existential-Risk Forecast & the MAP Escape. https://balospe.com/en/study/matheo/b16/.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). Matheo-b16: RiskyMAD, the Existential-Risk Forecast & the MAP Escape.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). Matheo-b17: h_star, Causal Concentration & an Experimental Test. https://balospe.com/en/study/matheo/b17/.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). Matheo-b17: h_star, Causal Concentration & an Experimental Test.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). Matheo-b18: Call to Action (and Companions). https://balospe.com/en/study/matheo/b18/.
Loewe, L., AI ClaudeOp46-48Max, and Everyone (2026). The PET Model: A Mereological Axiom System for Pan-En-Theistic Mathematical Theology.
Loewe, L. (2026). Matheo-b19: SGIR, Stopping a Pandemic in Mid-Flight.
National Center for Health Workforce Analysis, & Health Resources and Services Administration (2014). Sex, Race, and Ethnic Diversity of U.S. Health Occupations (2010–2012). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://web.archive.org/web/20201024060416/https://bhw.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bhw/nchwa/diversityushealthoccupations_2012.pdf.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2024). Traffic Safety Facts: 2023 Motor Vehicle Crashes — Overview. Available at https://www.nhtsa.gov/data/crash-data-systems.
Nobel Laureate Assembly for the Prevention of Nuclear War (2025). Declaration for the Prevention of Nuclear War. Nobel Laureate Assembly for the Prevention of Nuclear War, Chicago, July 2025. Available at https://nobelassembly.org/declaration/; full text at https://nobelassembly.org/declaration-for-the-prevention-of-nuclear-war-final/.
Pope Leo XIV (2026 , May). Magnifica Humanitas: On Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence (Encyclical Letter). Available at https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html.
U.S. Department of Transportation (2021 , 3). Departmental Guidance: Treatment of the Value of Preventing Fatalities and Injuries in Preparing Economic Analyses. March 2021 update. Listed on the DOT site as “Valuation of a Statistical Life Guidance” (page last updated 4 April 2021). Available at https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2021-03/DOT%20VSL%20Guidance%20-%202021%20Update.pdf.
U.S. Government Accountability Office (2008). Terrorism Insurance: Status of Coverage Availability for Attacks Involving Nuclear, Biological, Chemical, or Radiological Weapons. U.S. Government Accountability Office. GAO-09-39, U.S. Government Accountability Office, 12 December 2008. Available at https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-09-39; full report PDF at https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-09-39.pdf.
World Health Organization (2015). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2015. World Health Organization. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2015 (ISBN 978-92-4-156506-6; published 16 October 2015). Reports Libya's road-traffic death rate at 73.4 per 100,000 (2013 data), the highest national rate in the report. Available at https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565066; full PDF at https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/189242/9789241565066_eng.pdf.
World Health Organization (2023). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2023. World Health Organization.
World Health Organization (2023). Road Safety: Libya 2023 Country Profile. Available at https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/road-safety-lby-2023-country-profile; country data at https://data.who.int/countries/434.