STa9-JUB AIMS Ket — Organize the Great Jubilee Race#

Single-page Ketubah commitment (page 312 of 360) defining the STa9-JUB stadion mission: run point for regular 50-year maintenance of humanity’s innovation economy via self-stabilizing Jubilee cycles.

Download the original document (PDF)

STa9-JUB AIMS Ket — PDF (44 KB) — 1 page, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: aims-1-sta9-jub-great-jubilee-race-organizing-iv_llol_ppv2r22p2_2025m11d15-ket.pdf

WebP preview (100 KB)

STa9-JUB AIMS Ket — Organize the Great Jubilee Race

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhJ_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract#

This single-page AIMS ket defines the STa9-JUB stadion commitment within the Ketubah (page 312 of 360). The mission statement follows the standard AIMS format:

Run point for regular 50-year maintenance of humanity’s innovation economy so it can pass Earth’s Great Filter Tribulation in the Great Jubilee Race with Yah’s 3 Annual Jubilee-Festival Conferences for learning from the past, coordinating the present, and inspiring future visions — for all to aid all in better organizing common-goods for proper Jubilee cycles in self-stabilizing innovation economies.

The three outcome clauses specify that STa9-JUB:

  • Follows Yas’ ground-breaking way to follow Moses (Mt.5–7) to complete Yas’ life-mission (Lk.4:18)

  • Submits to Allah’s recreative hierarchy of ShAbbaTs (Lev.25, Isa.56) in Yah’s nested innovation Cathedral in Time

  • Improves LLoL’s Lazy Updating Algorithm (J.Chem.Phys. 2014) for measuring how well local and global actions serve common goods for all OLT

Key Concepts at a Glance#

Great Jubilee Race

The long-term effort to maintain and improve civilization’s innovation economy through regular 50-year rebalancing cycles

50-year maintenance

Based on the biblical Jubilee (Lev.25): regular systemic resets that prevent accumulation of self-organizing criticality

3 Annual Conferences

Jubilee-Festival gatherings for (1) learning from the past, (2) coordinating the present, (3) inspiring future visions

Lazy Updating Algorithm

LLoL’s published algorithm (J.Chem.Phys. 2014) adapted as a framework for measuring how well actions serve common goods

Great Filter

The existential bottleneck that civilizations must pass to survive long-term; the Jubilee System is proposed as the mechanism for navigating it

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)#

STa9-JUB makes the case that regular systemic maintenance is not optional but essential for complex systems. The analogy is clear: machines need maintenance, democracies need elections, and economies need Jubilee resets. The connection to LLoL’s published scientific work (the Lazy Updating Algorithm in the Journal of Chemical Physics) grounds the theological proposal in peer-reviewed methodology. The 3-conference structure provides a practical organizational framework for what would otherwise be an abstract economic philosophy. The direct invocation of the Great Filter hypothesis from astrobiology connects ancient Jubilee cycles to modern existential risk studies.

Document Information#

Document ID

STa9-JUB AIMS Ket

Author

Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL)

Date

2025m11d15

Version

iv_LLoL_PPv2r22p2_2025m11d15

Format

Single-page AIMS ket (Ketubah page 312 of 360)

PDF size

44 KB

License

Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Part of

Good News Pack MMv3, Flying Scroll / Transwarp Key / STa9-JUB

Related documents:

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhJ_2026m04d16 —End—

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhJ_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-twk-sta9-jub-aims-1-ket] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-twk-sta9-jub-aims-1-ket] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.