Bool 1 — 16x Binary Truth Void#

The first andOr Witches poster — systematically mapping all 16 binary Boolean operations and defining VOID (NoObtainableTerms) as the ground of formal logic.

Download the original document (PDF)

Bool 1 — 16x Binary Truth Void — PDF (104 KB) — 1 page, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: poster-bool-1-andor-witches-16x-binary-truth-void-iv_llol_qqv1r2p2_2024m10d06-fig.pdf

WebP preview (264 KB)

Also in this folder: Bool 2 — Heaven Investor, Bool 3 — Salvation Door, Bool Combo — Jubilee Cycles

Bool 1 — 16x Binary Truth Void — all 16 binary Boolean operations mapped systematically

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhH_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract#

This is the first poster in the “andOr Witches” Boolean logic series. It systematically maps all 16 binary Boolean operations — the complete set of truth functions that take two Boolean inputs and produce one Boolean output. The poster defines two foundational boundary concepts: VOID (NoObtainableTerms), representing the operation that always returns false regardless of inputs, and OMNI (OMNITerms), representing the operation that always returns true. Between these extremes lie the 14 remaining operations, including the familiar AND, OR, XOR, NAND, NOR, and others. The poster explores the semantics of nothing (ason) and how these 16 operations relate to truth, building the formal foundation for the subsequent posters in the series.

Key Concepts at a Glance#

16 Binary Boolean Operations

The complete set of truth functions mapping two Boolean inputs to one Boolean output — from VOID (all-false) to OMNI (all-true)

VOID (NoObtainableTerms)

The Boolean operation that always returns false; the formal representation of nothing obtainable from any combination of inputs

OMNI (OMNITerms)

The Boolean operation that always returns true; the complement of VOID, representing unconditional truth across all input states

andOr Witches

The series title reflecting how AND and OR select which cases truly apply — “witches” that sort truth from falsehood

ason (nothing)

The semantic exploration of what nothing means in formal logic, grounding the VOID concept in both mathematical and broader terms

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)#

This poster establishes the combinatorial completeness of binary Boolean logic as a starting point for the series. By naming and placing VOID and OMNI at the boundaries, it frames the 16 operations not as an arbitrary catalogue but as a structured space with identifiable poles. This is foundational for the subsequent posters: Bool 2 maps this space onto theological investment concepts, and Bool 3 identifies which operations correspond to the narrow path of truth. The explicit treatment of nothing (ason) connects formal logic to deeper questions about what it means for a proposition to yield no obtainable result — a theme that recurs throughout the BABL/ZION framework where BABL’s over-simplification can collapse a rich logical space into a false VOID.

Document Information#

Document ID

Bool 1 — 16x Binary Truth Void (Flying Scroll, transwarpkey/sta1-evx/)

Author

Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL)

Date

2024m10d06

Version

iv_LLoL_QQv1r2p2_2024m10d06

Format

Single-page poster

License

Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Part of

Good News Pack MMv3, Flying Scroll / Transwarp Key / STa1-EVX

PDF size

104 KB

WebP size

264 KB

Related documents:

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhH_2026m04d16 —End—

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhH_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-twk-sta1-evx-bool-1-truth] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-twk-sta1-evx-bool-1-truth] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.