Poster SD3 — Limited Durable 1-Year Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters (POAATAD)

A 4x3ft visual poster presenting both pages of the POAATAD contract overview — a limited 1-year Power of Attorney enabling ResearchCity to advocate for averting disasters of any kind.

Download the original document (PDF)

Poster SD3 — POAATAD — PDF (197 KB) — 1-page poster (4x3 ft), Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: poster-sd3-poaatad-power-of-attorney-advocating-to-avert-disaster-iv_llol_qqv1r1p1_2025m09d07-4x3ft.pdf

WebP preview (448 KB)

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —Start—

Abstract

Poster SD3 presents both pages of the POAATAD — Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters. The left half (SD3a) contains the contract terms; the right half (SD3b) provides an explanatory overview addressing why one would trust LLoL with such a document.

The contract authorizes LLoL and ResearchCity for 1 year to: (1) advocate to avert disasters, starting with the worst; (2) scale up ResearchCity in 7–8 stages to dismantle 7DUIs (Death Urn Incinerators); (3) solve existential challenges from local to global; (4) negotiate with Earth’s “10 Nuclear Kings” to “Put Earth in an Escrow”; (5) engage with cultural, social, political, and spiritual questions; (6) build AIPTO (Atlantic Indian Pacific Treaty Organization); and (7) explore offers by extra-terrestrials, especially Jesus/Yas.

The funding model is approximately $8/year/person/stadion — a “2-cent/day mustard-seed network of trust” funding 1600 Talent Stadia, each with a specialized arena. The contract includes sections on Offer, Negotiation (via EDEN — Evolving Diverse streams Encouraging Negotiation), Consideration (contract terms), Risks of signing, and Risks of not signing.

The SD3b side explains why the alternatives to signing are worse: without a better counteroffer, conscious rejection may advance humanity’s self-destruction. It describes the 7DUI challenges (pandemics, ocean ecology, water/soil, global heating, misaligned jobs, growth-by-extraction death, AI/nuclear extinction) and the 7Capstone constitutional framework for surviving them.

Key Concepts at a Glance

POAATAD	Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters — limited to 1 year, restricted to gentle kind reasonable advocacy
7DUI (Death Urn Incinerators)	7 existential threats from Rev. 16 mapped to science: pandemics, ocean death, water/soil wars, global heating, misaligned jobs, growth-by-extraction, AI/nuclear extinction
ResearchCity	Global institution of 1600 Talent Stadia funded at ~$8/year/ person, evolving in 7–8 stages to avert Armageddon-disasters
FiShFu (Fiduciaries Sharing Futures)	288,000 professionals paid by all to work for all, carrying fiduciary responsibility for long-term decision-support
Mustard-Seed Network of Trust	Funding model of ~2 cents/day/person to scale ResearchCity while capping special-interest influence
Epiocracy	Governance defined by the trifecta-rule of gentle kind reasonable balancing, easing and explaining insight-information for every party
7Capstone	Highest law in a global epiocracy constitution, paralleling the 7 goals of the US Constitution preamble

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)

This poster presents LLoL’s core legal-economic instrument. Several features are distinctive:

1. Legal form as advocacy tool. Using the Power of Attorney framework — a well-understood legal instrument — to structure global advocacy is original. The limitation to 1 year and to “gentle kind reasonable” advocacy provides built-in accountability.

2. Micro-funding architecture. The $8/year/person cap is designed to prevent capture by wealthy special interests while making participation accessible globally. The conceptual art PDF sale mechanism is unconventional but internally consistent.

3. Risk transparency. The explicit “Risks of signing” section (financial, social, political, personal) and the counter-question (“Given nuclear roulette, how can I prove this is safe to ignore?”) are unusually candid for a fundraising document.

4. Constitutional parallels. Mapping the 7Capstone to the US Constitution preamble (form union, improve justice, grow peace, provide defense, promote welfare, secure liberty, preserve posterity) provides a recognizable governance framework.

5. EDEN negotiation model. The 42-day inquisition period for exploring and improving the contract demonstrates a commitment to evolving the terms through feedback rather than presenting a fixed take-it-or-leave-it offer.

Document Information

Document ID	Poster SD3 (Flying Scroll)
Full title	Limited Durable 1-year Power Of Attorney Advocating To Avert Disasters (POAATAD)
Subtitle	Contract with LLoL to win trust for his ResearchCity vision to avert Armageddon-disasters
Author	Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL)
Dates	Original 2025-01-24; revision 2025-05-29; poster 2025-09-07
Version	iv_LLoL_QQv1r1p1_2025m09d07 (poster); iv_LLoL_RRv1r1p1_2025m01d24+m05d29 (contract text)
Format	1-page wall poster, 4 x 3 ft (landscape), showing both SD3a and SD3b contract pages
License	Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain
Part of	Good News Pack MMv3, Flying Scroll collection
PDF size	197 KB
WebP size	448 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

• SD3 — POAATAD (full document)

• SD1 — Nuclear Winter Forecast (the threat motivating POAATAD)

• SD2 — Epiocracy (governance framework)

• OL5 — to the United Nations (references the escrow proposal)

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —End—

Collapse all Expand all

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-flyingscroll-page-poster-sd3] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-flyingscroll-page-poster-sd3] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

• Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

• Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.