10 Born Enjoyability Guidelines — Sex-Positive Draft for Biblical Family Values

A 2-page deexcerpt of the 10 Commandments for practical sex, sex education, and sexual ethics under the Jonah Hypothesis.

Download the original document (PDF)

10 BEGs Sex Positivity — PDF (54 KB) — 2 pages, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: 10e-beg-born-enjoyability-guidelines-sex-positivity-draft-iv_llol_ppv0r3_2023m07d24-2page.pdf

WebP preview

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —Start—

Abstract

This 2-page document presents 10 Born Enjoyability Guidelines (BEGs) — LLoL’s “deexcerpt” of the 10 Commandments for the domain of sex, sex education, and sexual ethics. Created 2020–2023 as variant 10e-BEG-iv_LLoL_PPv0r3_2023m07d24, it illustrates the versatility of the 10 Modeling Quality Guidelines by applying them to human sexuality under the Jonah Hypothesis.

The 10 BEGs are:

1. Trifecta-holy sexual identity. Each person has a God-given sexual identity to personally enjoy and govern responsibly. Humane Equal Dignity (HuED) demands these inalienable rights be respected.

2. Don’t follow bashmoling idols. BAAL (Blindly Asserting Aggrandizing Leadership), ASHERAH (Automating Stereotyping Habits Erroneously Rounding Against Hope), and MOLOCH (Mistakes Oppressing Life Obliterating Crucial Help) form a death-trifecta that attacks sexuality through oversimplifying, overcomplicating, and overreach.

3. Don’t fake happiness. Learn to talk gentle kind reasonably about subjective realities on an equal basis.

4. Select times of rest. ShAbbat as sacramental recreation — learn to enjoy inner connection to Reality without dependence on others.

5. Respect generational and cultural dignity. Don’t force encounters; before “Born” can replace “Porn” online, web standards are needed.

6. Don’t use force. Rape is sex-arson — it kills people inside.

7. Don’t break trust. Don’t hide partners or vital medical info.

8. Don’t wear down someone’s No. Especially protect children.

9. Don’t deny dignity. Stereotypes degrade persons; replace Porn with Born (sex-positive dignity-respecting content).

10. Don’t fall for coveting hamster-wheels. Sexual competing serves nothing by killing joy.

Key Concepts at a Glance

BEG (Born Enjoyability Guidelines)	10 guidelines deexcerpted from the 10 Commandments for the domain of sexual ethics and sex education
Trifecta-holy sexual identity	Each person’s God-given sexual identity with three dimensions to be personally enjoyed and responsibly governed
Bashmoling	The combined attack of BAAL, ASHERAH, and MOLOCH — a death-trifecta of oversimplifying, overcomplicating, and overreach that destroys relationships
BAAL	Blindly Asserting Aggrandizing Leadership — oversimplifies by bullying in bed and beyond
ASHERAH	Automating Stereotyping Habits Erroneously Rounding Against Hope — overcomplicates by growing fake decision trees
MOLOCH	Mistakes Oppressing Life Obliterating Crucial Help — overreaches by violating vital boundaries
HuED	Humane Equal Dignity — the foundational principle that all persons born in ZION (Ps. 87) have inalienable sexual rights
Born vs Porn	LLoL’s proposed replacement: Born (sex-positive, dignity- respecting content) to replace Porn (objectifying content)
ShAbbat	The sacrament of weekly rest where Reality works to replace “the I in our ShIt by Abba” — essential for overcoming bashmoling

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)

This short document attempts something unusual: a sex-positive reading of the 10 Commandments that is neither permissive nor restrictive in conventional terms. Several features are notable:

1. The deexcerpt method. Rather than using the Commandments to prohibit, LLoL “deexcerpts” them into guidelines for enjoyment. Each BEG begins with a positive affirmation before identifying threats. This structural choice reframes sexual ethics from rule-following to identity-protection.

2. The bashmoling framework. Defining BAAL, ASHERAH, and MOLOCH as three modes of attack on human sexuality (oversimplification, overcomplication, overreach) provides a systematic diagnostic. The framework applies equally to conservative and progressive failures in sexual ethics.

3. The Born/Porn distinction. Proposing “Born” as a replacement for “Porn” — content that aids personal dignity in sex-positive ways — acknowledges that banning pornography is ineffective while also refusing to normalize it. This is consistent with LLoL’s general approach of replacing broken systems rather than merely opposing them.

4. Draft status. The PPv0r3 version label and 2023 date mark this as an early draft in LLoL’s Biblical Family Values series, predating the more mature MMv3 collection by over two years.

Document Information

Document ID	10e BEG on SexEd (Extra Good News, Biblical Family Values)
Full title	10 Born Enjoyability Guidelines — Sex Positivity Draft
Author	Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL)
Date	2023-07-24
Version	iv_LLoL_PPv0r3_2023m07d24
Format	2-page guidelines document with numbered entries
License	Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain
Part of	Good News Pack MMv3, Extra Good News / Biblical Family Values
PDF size	54 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

• Paul Study — Apostle Paul on Marriage and Homosexuality

• SD2 — Epiocracy

• SD7 — 7 Resilience Healing Processes

• Book of Life — Draft Ketubah

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —End—

Collapse all Expand all

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-extra-good-news-bfv-sex-positivity] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-extra-good-news-bfv-sex-positivity] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

• Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

• Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.