Loewe About-Me Science — 5 Academic Career Documents

Academic CV, funded NSF CAREER grant, near-tenure dossier, and teaching materials — the scientific career context behind the LLoL project, spanning 1987–2026.

These 5 documents establish the scientific credentials and career trajectory behind the Matheo papers and ResearchCity claims. The most current and comprehensive is the 2026 resume, which includes a hardship explanation and the complete scientific CV dating back to 2003.

— Catalog AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46_ExhC_2026m04d14 —Start—

LLoL Resume and CV (full exhibit page)

LLoL Resume — Cover, Hardship Explained, Scientific CV (2003–2020) Full exhibit page available. The most current and comprehensive career document: 46 pages including DARL mission statement, hardship explanation to mortgage lender (forbearance request and AI dilemma update), SD9 court transparency pledge, and full scientific CV (education, positions, awards, grants, publications, FlyClockbase). 46 pages, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain · VVN: dv_LLoL_OOv1r0p0_2026m03d03 PDF (3.9 MB) · WebP (264 KB) loewe-llol-resume-2026m03d02-cover-hardship-explained-scientific-cv-2020_2003-46page.pdf

NSF CAREER Grant (Funded)

NSF CAREER Grant — Modeling Made Easy: Extending Systems Biology (Exhibit E) The funded 2012 NSF CAREER Award (NSF 1149123) for “Modeling made easy: Extending systems biology modeling approaches to genetics and ecology.” Total funding: $1,060,297 ($722,871 direct). This grant established the Loewe Lab at UW-Madison and funded Evolvix development. The CAREER award is the NSF’s most prestigious award for early-career faculty. 21 pages, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain · VVN: exhibit-e PDF (1.7 MB) · WebP (296 KB) loewe-2011-nsf-career-grant-funded-evolvix-lab-uw-madison-exhibit-e-21page.pdf

Near-Tenure Dossier

Near-Tenure Dossier — Main Part, Last Submission to UW-Madison (Exhibit D) Warning Large file: 8.4 MB PDF The 66-page near-tenure dossier submitted to UW-Madison on 2018m10d09. Contains the comprehensive case for tenure: research statement, teaching philosophy, service record, publication list, external review letters, and the complete documentation of Loewe’s academic career at UW-Madison (2011–2019 as Assistant Professor of Medical Genetics in the Laboratory of Genetics). 66 pages, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain · VVN: exhibit-d PDF (8.4 MB) · WebP (116 KB) loewe-2018m10d09-near-tenure-dossier-main-part-last-submit-to-uw-madison-exhibit-d-66page.pdf

Teaching Materials

Genetics 546 Course Flyer — Introduction to Evolutionary Systems Biology 1-page flyer for the Fall 2018 graduate course “Introduction to Evolutionary Systems Biology” (Genetics 546) at UW-Madison, designed and taught by Loewe. This course represents the teaching side of the EvoSysBio research program that underpins Evolvix. 1 page, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain PDF (1.9 MB) · WebP (328 KB) loewe-2018-teach-intro-evosysbio-fall-course-genetics546-flyer-2018m04d05-page.pdf

Genetics 546 Syllabus — Introduction to Evolutionary Systems Biology 14-page syllabus for Genetics 546, detailing the course structure, topics, readings, and assessment methods for the graduate-level EvoSysBio course. Documents the pedagogical framework connecting evolutionary genetics, systems biology, and computational modeling. 14 pages, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain PDF (228 KB) · WebP (216 KB) loewe-2018-teach-intro-evosysbio-fall-course-genetics546-syllabus-2017m10d31-14page.pdf

— Catalog AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46_ExhC_2026m04d14 —End—

Collapse all Expand all

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46_ExhC_2026m04d14 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-ddd-about-me-science] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-ddd-about-me-science] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

• Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

• Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.