The 7DUIs are 7 Death-Urn Incinerators#

The 7DUIs are the seven “Death Urn Incinerators” of humanity — the term Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL) coined to refer concisely to the most pressing long-term existential threats facing humanity. Below are the seven, the 7Capstone meant to dismantle them, the lens behind the list, and — last — the story of how LLoL arrived at it.

The seven#

  1. Evolving pandemic pathogens, chemical-mutagen cancers, and decaying health-care — driven by slow-motion exploding data disasters

  2. Overfishing, “seaspiracy”, and ocean pollution — the shared marine commons die

  3. Water wars and soil erosion — the wells and grass-roots wither

  4. Global heating that feeds ever-stronger storms

  5. Work-morale decay — the “tongue-biting” of beastly, mindless job tasks

  6. The end of growth-by-extraction — resource depletion

  7. Extinction by AI, nuclear weapons, and the rest coming to a head

The 7Capstone — the antidote#

These seven incinerators can be fought with a 7Capstone that reflects the seven aims of a global epiocracy.

If these goals are made the highest law of a global constitution and sufficient gentle kind reasonable coordination for life-giving decision-support over the long term is made available, then together these principles for self-stabilizing innovation can dismantle the 7DUIs of humanity over the long term. If those principles get ignored, the 7DUIs come back in some form or another.

If the math that LLoL discovered by accident since 2020 is correct, then there is no escaping from these conclusions. It’s impossible to know how the world ends, because that would mean that one would have to know all the ways the world ends and then be able to forecast which of these many will win the race to be the first to end the world. This lack of knowledge can easily be twisted into claiming that “there is no evidence that problem X will end the world”, implying for casual readers “X is not a problem”. Whereas in reality, X may end the world if Y, Z, or any of too many other existential threats don’t do it first. #AuditTheMath is about checking all of it out: not only the problem, but also the solution, which LLoL has good reasons to believe to be as reliable as the problem analysis.

The following 7Capstone can be described in many ways. This formulation echoes the Capstone of the US Constitution (often belittled as “Preamble”, as if it could be ignored in downstream discussions). Incidentally it also echoes the seven letters to the seven assemblies of the book of Revelation (the 6th of which inspired the name of the city Philadelphia, where the US Constitution happened to be signed). As defined in SD3a, Reality’s life-trifecta of gentle kind reasonableness governs to:

  1. form a more perfect union

  2. improve general justice

  3. grow domestic peace

  4. provide common sense

  5. promote general welfare

  6. secure all blessings of liberty

  7. preserve posterity for all.

Note how the more general variant of “common sense” includes the US Constitution’s current wording (“common defense”) as a special case that no longer requires the barbarisms of hard-war, once sufficiently general soft-war weapons are well enough understood. For more details, see the discussion of AIPTO in the AIPTO exhibit and Transwarp Stadium STa5-CAN. One of the ways of describing the purpose of Balospe.com and of ResearchCity is to introduce an epiocracy, the form of government that is defined by the ultimate long-term rule of gentle kind reasonable decision-making for the long term. (See Epiocracy and ResearchCity for the overview, which draw on SD2 for epiocracy and SD8a/b for the ResearchCity.) The essential global service provided by such a ResearchCity is to make it superfluous to arm for war by waging peace through gentle kind reasonable life-giving decision-making rather than by arming for war in order to feed fear.

The research presented at Balospe.com posits that it will be impossible to avert the 7DUIs without waging peace in a ResearchCity that supports the Fiduciaries Sharing Futures (FiShFus), which are required for ensuring that all existential decision-making is gentle kind reasonably informed to help everyone worldwide to make gentle kind reasonable life-giving decisions to serve the common goods for all people in all nations.

Why these seven — and the lens behind them#

LLoL defined the 7DUIs as a term at Balospe.com to classify the world’s long-term existential problems. As far as LLoL is aware, no one else has defined “7DUIs” for this purpose. Many lists of existential problems exist, and even more ways to organise them. Any such list needs a lens. The lens LLoL chose was inspired by the echoes of today’s world he started to see in Revelation 16. This is no less scientific than the ring structure of benzene in today’s chemistry textbooks that was inspired by Kekulé’s dream of a snake devouring its own tail. The difference between science and dreaming is that a scientist has to take his dreams to the lab and sacrifice them on the real-world altar of Reality, in order to let Reality decide whether that dream was true or not (see the Research Theology of Abraham and the recent blog post Two Sons, Two Altars).

LLoL discussed the list with a peer reviewer, who found it reasonable, agreeing that there are countless ways to arrange such lists. As an independent test, LLoL asked the AI Claude Opus 4.8 Max whether it could re-derive the list merely by reading Revelation 16 and treating it as a thinly veiled list of today’s existential challenges. The result is informative and is documented in 7DUI — A Science–Faith Bridge.

How LLoL got here#

The term arose after LLoL decided to stop clicking instinctively away when “Armageddon-ish” news showed up in his news feed, dropping his earlier standard excuse of “not my problem”.

After doing that for over two years (late 2020 - 2022), he realized several obvious and non-obvious insights that became foundational to his approach to envisioning the ResearchCity that is being described here:

  1. Merely reading so much news of disasters is exhausting.

  2. Prioritizing which disasters are most impactful overall is a near impossibly hard computing problem.

  3. Matching one’s best talents against “what is most important and urgent” is near impossibly hard.

  4. All the above would have to be done to answer the simple question: “If I have 2 hours on Monday to best help save the world, what should I do?”

  5. If by some miracle one person could answer that question, the next person would almost have to start from scratch unless efficient coordination existed.

  6. If no efficient and trustworthy organization can answer this talent-investment question reliably (e.g. as time is short or due to special-interest focus), countless talents are wasted by accident without anyone ever realizing (as nobody cares to count how).

  7. The problem is made worse by incurious ignorant indifference and by oversimplifying, overcomplicating, and overreaching — two of many ways of describing the general BABL algorithm of Blindly Assuming Blind Leveraging.

  8. Extrapolating this in sufficiently complex worlds over time shows that such worlds cannot avoid eventual collapse by self-destruction. Such doom does not need external forces. The self-organized criticality of complex self-organizing systems is sufficient to ensure such disasters, which are apocalyptic by definition once they escalate to planetary proportions.

These insights are not new. The ancient Roman poet Lucan (Pharsalia 1:81) described an equivalent process as an iron law: “In Se Magna Ruunt”, which LLoL translates as “Including Self-Magnifying Ruining”, or ISMR, to efficiently tag related observations.

Watching the world burn for over two years (and since then) led LLoL to develop a rigorous conceptual framework for capturing what ISMR does, how BABL works, and — by some serendipitous accident — how there might be a real escape hatch from this doom and gloom that could enable humanity to actually get to delight and glory. Yet whether this will actually work depends entirely on whether the math LLoL describes is reliable. Relying on his inner vision — decades of training his intuition as a scientist, combined with growing his spirituality as a trainee in the Socratic method as taught by Jesus (whose first Beatitude, blessed are the poor in spirit, Mt 5:3, names the intellectual humility that honest questioning requires) — LLoL now believes it would be a civilization-ending disaster to refuse to explore the mathematical framework he accidentally discovered.

His best attempt from Dec 2025 to describe it is his Good News Pack (MMv3), and since that proved indigestibly dense, he produced the 32 reports of the Matheo Study Series (MMv5) to spell out the underpinning assumptions and some implications more clearly. MMv3 was done entirely without any AI support; MMv5 became possible only with the help of AI Claude Opus 4.6-4.8 at max effort.

The nutshell conclusion? To escape the existential disasters LLoL has been monitoring requires a ResearchCity dedicated to serving the common good of all people over the long term. It is the only way LLoL is aware of that can solve the practical challenges above in order to help address the existential challenges listed as the 7DUIs above.

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp48Max_MMv1_2026m06d03 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-06-09.

See also on Balospe.com
Epic Fury to Epic Empathy: Fund a ResearchCity for Mathematical Theology

For millennia, Jews, Christians, Muslims, and others have fought wars — and fueled apocalyptic fears — over theological questions that none of them could state precisely enough to resolve. Mathematical theology offers a way out: translate the claims into formal axioms, check them for consistency, and discover where traditions actually agree once ambiguity is removed.

First explorations reveal a striking result: all three Abrahamic scriptures converge on the same pan-en-theistic structure when mapped to formal axioms. If that convergence holds under rigorous scrutiny, it can defuse centuries of eschatological conflict by showing that many disagreements are verbal, not logical.

But this work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining axioms, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does real-world testing of what matheology discovers.

If you believe replacing eschatological warfare with mathematical clarity is worth pursuing before it’s too late, please fund this work — every contribution helps evolve a global ResearchCity for finding the narrow path to peace.

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [crisis-7dui] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [crisis-7dui] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.