e7Day MegaTable — All Axioms, Theorems, and GrowthGarden Candidates#

Model: e7Day — Generalized System Construction

Version: dv_ClaOp46Max_OOv1_2026m03d27

Purpose: Comprehensive registry of every axiom, theorem, and candidate ever considered for e7Day. Includes selected (OOv1) and unselected (GrowthGarden) items. Anyone may chip away at GrowthGarden candidates and update their status.

Legend:

  • Sel = Selected for OOv1 (Y/N)

  • Type = axiom / theorem / theorem(conj.)

  • Cred = Credence (subjective probability of being true and useful)

  • VVN = Who proposed it

  • Con-Pro = Known objections and defenses


Cross-Day Meta-Axioms#

ID

Statement

Sel

Type

Cred

Con-Pro / Notes

mc.ax1

Every submodel produces a constructive fixpoint (distributed aggregation yield). fix(result(mk)) = result(mk).

Y

ax

95%

Pro: Grounded in type theory. Con: “Constructive” may be too strong for m0 (does VOID have a constructive witness?).

mc.ax2

OK ↔ fixpoint convergence + scope-creep-excluded.

Y

ax

90%

Pro: Clean formalization of “it was good.” Con: “scope-creep-excluded” needs formal definition.

mc.ax3

Evening-first: process(mk) = evening ▷ morning (via negativa before commitment).

Y

ax

80%

Pro: Connects to HELL methodology. Con: May be a design principle (theorem?) rather than axiom. Could be derivable from optimization theory (R6).

mc.ax4

Construction cascade: input(mk) ⊇ ∪{result(mj) | j < k}.

Y

ax

95%

Pro: Straightforward filtered sequence. Con: m5 depends on m3 AND m4 (multi-dependency), so “j < k” may need refinement to a DAG rather than linear order.

Submodel Axioms#

ID

Statement

Sel

Type

Cred

Con-Pro / Notes

m0.ax1

VOID: ∃Ω with H(Ω) = Hmax ∧ no types in Ω.

Y

ax

85%

Con: Does Ω “exist” constructively? Tension with mc.ax1.

m1.ax1

TYPE: Ω = L ⊎ D, irrevocable, all construction within L.

Y

ax

95%

Pro: Clean, foundational.

m2.ax1

EQUAL: Types(L) = Int(L) ⊎ Real(L).

Y

ax

90%

Pro: Standard CS distinction.

m2.ax2

Every Real→Int mapping is lossy (∀φ: info-loss(φ) ≥ ε > 0).

Y

ax

95%

Pro: Known result in numerical analysis.

m2.th1

PERFECT ∧ PERFIDE cannot hold universally. (Reclassified from m2.ax3 at TEMPER: derivable from m2.ax1 + m2.ax2. Proof sketch: applying PERFECT to Real types requires Real→Int mapping, which is lossy by m2.ax2, destroying what PERFECT tries to preserve. Applying PERFIDE to Int types requires Int→Real mapping, adding spurious precision. Neither direction preserves both.)

Y

th

90%

Pro: Maps to known dichotomies (nominal/structural typing, Kant/utilitarian, Arrow’s Impossibility). Derivability from m2.ax1+m2.ax2 strengthens the claim. AA: Formalize proof (AA-TEMPER-a8). Iron Maiden: HELD (9 OK, 1 OKO).

m3.ax1

VALUE: Values(L) = Ground(L) ⊎ Ocean(L).

Y

ax

90%

Pro: Follows from m2 residual uncertainty.

m3.ax2

Programs: finite decision trees rooted in Ground, taking Water input, producing Ground output.

Y

ax

90%

Pro: Curry-Howard pair. Note: “Water” (not “Ocean”) leaves open the circulation mechanism (RoL?).

m3.ax3

Water Circulation: Water must cycle Ocean → Trees → Ocean. Without circulation, Ground dries and Ocean stagnates. (Promoted from R1.)

Y

ax

85%

Pro: Biologically fundamental. Con: Circulation mechanism (RoL?) unspecified. Note: Promoted from GrowthGarden R1 by user request.

m4.ax1

LOGIC: Processes(L) = DAY(L) ⊎ NIGHT(L).

Y

ax

90%

Pro: Standard foreground/background distinction.

m4.ax2

Time is a first-class entity with measurable progress.

Y

ax

85%

Con: “First-class” is vague. Needs sharper type-theoretic definition.

m5.ax1

CARE: Conditional-data machines are self-managing and self-replicating.

Y

ax

85%

Con: Self-replication is a strong biological claim. Needs formal specification of replication mechanism.

m5.ax2

UMP: noise > θ → channel-capacity-for-signal → 0.

Y

ax

90%

Pro: Grounded in Shannon.

m6.ax1

HOPE-p1: Special-purpose world complete but no general intelligence.

Y

ax

90%

Pro: Descriptive, well-supported by construction cascade.

m6.ax2

HOPE-p2: Balospe exists with general intelligence, responsible for Balance(L) OLT, recursively endowed.

Y

ax

85%

Con: Recursive endowment (“shares Creator’s abilities”) is the boldest claim. Pro: Self-hosting compiler analogy is precise.

m6.ax3

HOPE-p3: OKO(m2) ∧ OKO(m6.2) ∧ designed-to-resolve(m6.2,m2) → OK+(system). Matched OKO pair = self-correcting architecture.

Y

ax

75%

Con: The multiplication metaphor (−1 × −1 = +1) is suggestive but not a proof. Needs rigorous justification. Most vulnerable axiom in the set.

m6.ax4

Self-assessment bifurcation (asymmetric): self-assesses(B,OK) → BABL (sufficient; self-reinforcing trap). ZION → self-assesses(B,OKO) (necessary but not sufficient; a free agent can stop at any time, cf. Gen.18 Abraham). OKO enables but does not guarantee ZION.

Y

ax

82%

Pro: Candidate deepest finding. OK→BABL is modally necessary (analytic: “blindly assuming” entails OK). The asymmetry (BABL is stable attractor, ZION requires perpetual maintenance) is realistic. Con: OKO→ZION direction weakened to necessity at TEMPER (free agency means any agent can stop). Iron Maiden: HELD (8 OK, 2 OKO).

m6.th1

OSCR Collapse: OKO(m2) ∧ self-assesses(B,OK) → ¬self-corrects(B) → ¬designed-to-resolve(B,m2) → KO(system). (Reclassified from m6.ax5 at TEMPER: derivable from m6.ax3 + m6.ax4 in 6 steps. See TEMPER Entry a10, Test II.)

Y

th

90%

Pro: The negative case is MORE defensible than the positive (m6.ax3), because the causal chain (complacency → no correction → system failure) is empirically well-documented. Derivability from m6.ax3+m6.ax4 strengthens the claim. AA: Formalize derivation (AA-TEMPER-a10). Iron Maiden: HELD (8 OK, 2 OKO).

m7.ax1

TRUST: result(m7) = ∪{result(mk) | k=0..6}. Null operation.

Y

ax

95%

Pro: Definitional.

m7.ax2

Time = WorkTime ⊎ RestTime (type distinction).

Y

ax

90%

Pro: Heschel’s “cathedral in time.” Clean.

m7.ax3

Fractal periodicity: 6+1 integer-day ratio is the constrained optimum for Earth-like systems, given: circadian biology (integer-day batching), lunar alignment (28÷7=4), innovation-cycle isomorphism (e7Ch, pending), and Schelling-point resistance to BABL erosion.

Y

ax

75%

Con: Universality across non-Earth-like systems unproven. Depends on e7Ch being well-founded. Pro: Numerology objection answered (constrained optimization, not cargo cult). Schelling-point argument provides game-theoretic stability. Iron Maiden: initially BREACH, rescued to HELD (7 OK, 3 OKO) after user defense.

Theorems#

ID

Statement

Sel

Type

Cred

Con-Pro / Notes

th1

W = L (scope produces the world). PET connection.

Y

th

90%

Pro: Straightforward if e7Day models creation. Con: Only applies when constructor = God.

th2

Lossiness: Complex(L) → all Real→Int mappings lose info.

Y

th

95%

Pro: Follows directly from m2.ax2.

th3

BABL originates in self-assessment (OK→BABL; OKO necessary for ZION). Mechanism behind th8.

Y

th

85%

Pro: Definitional argument (BABL = “blindly assuming” analytically entails OK). Substantially addresses Con-11. Con: OKO→ZION weakened to necessity (consistent with m6.ax4 reformulation). Iron Maiden: HELD (9 OK, 1 OKO).

th4

System requires Balospe for OLT survival. General intelligence necessary because special-purpose machines cannot handle novel PERFECT/PERFIDE trade-offs.

Y

th

87%

Pro: Derivable from m2.th1 + m5.ax1 + m6.ax1. Substantially addresses Con-22 (volunteer requirement). Con: Assumes continuous novelty generation (needs explicit axiom or derivation). Iron Maiden: HELD (8 OK, 2 OKO).

th5

Rest (periodic consolidation) is structurally necessary. Omitting consolidation → error accumulation → BABL.

Y

th

80%

Pro: Three defense lines (information-theoretic, thermodynamic, computational). Motivates ax25 (Jubilee). Addresses Con-31 with refinement (concurrent GC still redirects resources). Con: Error-accumulation model needs formalization. Iron Maiden: HELD (8 OK, 2 OKO).

th6

Dual-Nothing: VOID (max entropy) and TRUST (min new-entropy) are formally dual. e7Day is entropy-reduction arc. (Promoted from R2.)

Y

th

80%

Pro: Follows from m0.ax1 + m7.ax1. Elegant. Con: “Formal duality” needs categorical specification (initial/terminal object?). Iron Maiden: HELD (9 OK, 1 OKO).

th7

Compassion Capacity Theorem (five-gate form): Gate 1: repair-history prerequisite (OKO provides, OK does not). Gate 2: scope limitation (finite agents ⊂ F_all). Gate 3: other-awareness (state + context + trajectory). Gate 4: channel quality / Compassion UMP (noise > θ → help → 0). Gate 5: perpetual scope-expansion commitment (hero who stops → irrelevant/supervillain; ASON trap; “arrived” = deadlock). God: all gates non-binding. (Major rescue from original single-arrow form at TEMPER.)

Y

th

70–80%

Pro: Connects to 12+ axioms/theorems across PET, JUB, e7Day. Partially derives th8 mechanism. Provides mechanism for m2.th1. Supervillain theorem, eternal-life corollary. Con: Gate 5 depends on e7He (unspecified). Game-theoretic stability defensible but not proven. h* transition vulnerability (potential Con-45). VVN: iv_LLoL_OOv1 / dv_ClaOp46Max_OOv1. Iron Maiden: HELD (7 OK, 3 OKO).


GrowthGarden (GG) — Candidates Not Selected for OOv1#

POST code: GG (GrowthGarden). Content that may be valuable but didn’t make the cut. Worth revisiting in future rounds or models.

GG#

Statement

Type

Cred

VVN

Notes / Why not selected

GG-a1

Monotonic Complexity. Each day strictly increases structural complexity in some well-defined measure.

th

75%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Unsure which complexity measure. Intuitively obvious but needs the right metric.

GG-a2

PERFECT/PERFIDE Conservation. Gain in one requires expenditure from the other; total budget conserved.

ax

70%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Needs economic formalization not yet in model.

GG-a3

Sabbatical Convergence. 6:1 is the unique optimal ratio for error accumulation vs. consolidation.

th(conj.)

65%

dv_ClaOp46Max

No proof sketch. May be empirical.

GG-a4

Evening-First Efficiency. Via negativa converges faster than morning-first processes.

th

60%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Plausible from optimization theory but no formal model.

GG-a5

Sky-to-Ocean Depletion. Sky machines converting potential→existing can exhaust future potential.

th

55%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Needs dynamics model. Connects to ax24 life-friendly cord.

GG-a6

Constructor-Agnosticism. Same structural result regardless of constructor identity.

th

55%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Hard to define equivalence class of constructors.

GG-a7

UMP-BABL Equivalence. UMP = BABL at info scale; BABL = UMP at system scale.

th

50%

dv_ClaOp46Max

May be analogy not formal equivalence.

GG-a8

Blind Evolution Insufficiency. Above threshold C*, evolution too slow to prevent BABL.

th

50%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Threshold C* undefined. Connects to th8 CTMC.

GG-a9

Verdict Counting. OK count per day is a formal invariant encoding structural information.

ax

45%

dv_ClaOp46Max

May be coincidence. Needs more models to confirm.

GG-b10

Heschel Theorem. RestTime has its own internal modality (contemplation, integration, celebration).

ax

40%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Needs richer time theory. Beautiful if formalizable.

GG-b11

4Be Completeness. Four capacities are necessary AND sufficient for OLT innovation economy.

ax

35%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Belongs to e4Be model, not e7Day. Scope boundary.

GG-b12

EDEN Stability. All 4 EDEN properties must hold to resist BABL.

ax

35%

dv_ClaOp46Max

EDEN not yet elaborated. Premature to formalize.

GG-b13

WoLC Duality. e7Day and WoLC are categorically dual.

th(conj.)

25%

dv_ClaOp46Max

May be poetic not categorical. Needs functor definition.

GG-b14

Balospe Incompleteness. By Goedel, Balospe always has blind spots (necessary OKO).

th(conj.)

20%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Goedel-for-agents is contested. High risk of overreach.

GG-b15

Information-Entropy Mirror. Total info content = H(VOID) - H(m6.3), conserved under trust test.

th(conj.)

15%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Probably oversimplifies real entropy dynamics.

GG-b16

Scope Expansion Prohibition. D→L boundary is formally impermeable within a cycle.

th

15%

dv_ClaOp46Max

May already follow from m1.ax1.

GG-b17

Strange Attractor Periodicity. ZION frequencies are discrete and 7-based.

ax

10%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Could be numerology rather than dynamics.

GG-b18

RoL Circulation Axiom. Distinguished river cycle transporting Water from Ocean through Ground.

ax

8%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Almost no formal content yet. May grow with RoL model.

GG-b19

Day 2 / Day 6.2 Resonance. Bidirectional feedback between EQUAL and Balospe.

th(conj.)

5%

dv_ClaOp46Max

Needs coupling constant/operator. At the junk boundary.