Paper b14 — Extraction Prompt (Session Logs -> Knowledge Base)

Run this prompt in a Claude Code session BEFORE running the b14 writing prompt. It produces a structured knowledge base (KB) that the writing session loads as pre-digested input.

Note

Lessons from b12 and b13 extractions: Categories A (Design Rationales) and F (OSCR/BABL) yield richest material. Organize KB by model structure (axiom groups), not by category. 80% restate / 20% point. The JUB corpus is the LARGEST in the series (~20+ llog entries across multiple sessions). See BB/extraction-lessons-learned-for-next-extractons.rst for full recommendations. This prompt incorporates those lessons.

IMPORTANT: This extraction may need to be split into 2 sessions if context limits are reached. If so, split into: (A) OOv1-v2 development logs (b/11–b/35) and (B) stress tests + naming (b/35–b/50). Each sub-session produces its own partial KB; the paper writer merges them.

/effort max

TASK: Extract material from JUB development logs into a structured
knowledge base (KB) for writing Paper b14 (JUB Model) in the HEAVEN
study series. This is a preparation step --- you are NOT writing the
paper itself.

PHASE 1 --- ORIENT (read these in order):

1. .claude/CLAUDE.md --- especially Core Principle, Language Rules, LLog
   Rules, and the EDEN/BABL/ZION framework
2. The JUB model source (this is the STRUCTURE you will organize around):
   - source/matheology/model/jub/ (read all files: overview, axioms,
     theorems, symbols, quest)
   - NOTE: JUB extends PET (paper b11). Read the PET model too if needed.
3. The b14 writing prompt (this tells you what the paper NEEDS):
   source/matheology/hell/ll/study/b/14/b14-prompt-writing.rst
4. Paper b11 (PET) as format reference:
   source/matheology/hell/ll/study/b/11/study_ll_2026m04d03_a1-pet-paper.rst
5. The b12 extraction KB (for material already tagged as b14-relevant):
   source/matheology/hell/ll/study/b/12/study_ll_2026m04d04_a2-e7day-extraction-kb.rst
   (check the "Notes for Other Papers / For Paper b14" section ---
   PERFECT/PERFIDE -> Jubilee connection is the primary bridge)

After reading these, you should know:
- The 11 axioms (ax15-ax25) and 7 theorems (th5-th11)
- The domain partition (D_f / D_free / D_inno)
- What the paper needs to cover
- What material was already flagged during b12 extraction

PHASE 2 --- EXTRACT (walk the JUB logs):

The JUB development corpus is spread across ~20+ files in
source/matheology/hell/ll/jub/b/. Read them in numerical order.

KEY FILES (read these first --- they contain the most material):
- b/11/ --- initial theodicy development (final memory)
- b/16/ --- theodicy overview (Sonnet)
- b/18/ --- reply 1 for the Jubilee System argument
- b/20/ --- critique 2
- b/27/ --- restructuring 2a, critique 1 (c1-c3)
- b/29/ --- restructuring 2c, critique 1 (c8-c14)
- b/32/ --- restructuring phase 1 consolidate
- b/33/ --- phase 1 prompts reply overviews
- b/34/ --- restructuring 2F, critique 3
- b/35/ --- restructuring 2G-2H, stress tests
- b/42/ --- stress test dispositions
- b/50/ --- Jubilee naming coordination

ALSO CHECK for additional files not listed above:
ls source/matheology/hell/ll/jub/b/*/

For each log, extract ONLY material relevant to paper b14 (JUB).
Focus on these categories:

A. DESIGN RATIONALES --- Why was each axiom formulated this way? What
   alternatives were considered? Why ax15-ax25 in this sequence?
   Why these specific domain partitions?

B. TEMPER REFINEMENTS --- How did adversarial critique change the
   formulations? What moved from OOv1 to OOv2? What was reclassified?
   NOTE: JUB went through 3 adversarial critique rounds, not the
   FORGE TEMPER process. The critique structure is different but the
   extraction goal is the same: capture what testing changed.

C. REJECTED ALTERNATIVES --- Ideas explored but not included. Domain
   partition alternatives. Axiom formulations that were tried and
   replaced. Economic mechanisms considered but dropped.

D. CONNECTIONS TO PET/e7Day/e7He --- How JUB extends PET (ax1-ax14).
   How JUB connects to e7Day (BABL/ZION from b12) and e7He (h* from b13).
   The PERFECT/PERFIDE -> Jubilee bridge.

E. KEY INSIGHTS --- Observations about theodicy, economics, agency that
   illuminate the model but are not in the formal files. Analogies and
   real-world mappings.

F. OSCR/BABL MATERIAL --- Binary attractor dynamics (th8), social
   ergodicity (th9), Jubilee as BABL-escape mechanism.

H. FORMAL GAPS --- (NEW category for b14) Acknowledged gaps in the
   formalization: proto-formal predicates (Stable, Extensible,
   LifeFriendly), undefined agency semantics (can-choose, Willing),
   D_f/D_free boundary demarcation. The paper needs to acknowledge
   these honestly.

SCOPE RULE: Material about PET's God-world relationship (ax1-ax14)
belongs to b11, not b14. Skip it unless it illuminates a JUB axiom.
Material about e7Day system architecture belongs to b12.
Material about e7He hero journey stages belongs to b13.

PHASE 3 --- BUILD THE KB:

Save the knowledge base at:
source/matheology/hell/ll/study/b/14/study_ll_2026m04dNN_b14-jub-extraction-kb.rst
(replace NN with today's date)

Structure the KB as follows:
1. One section per JUB axiom group (Agency ax15-ax17, Delegation ax18-ax19,
   Volunteer/Mediator ax20-ax21, Preference ax22-ax23, Innovation ax24-ax25)
   + one for theorems + one for BABL/ZION + one for cross-paper + one for
   formal gaps
2. Within each section, organize by the categories above (A-H)
3. For each extracted item: state the key point concisely, give the
   source reference. Restate when more efficient than pointing.
4. End with a "Notes for Other Papers" section.

LLOG: Create an extraction session llog at:
source/matheology/hell/ll/study/b/14/study_ll_2026m04dNN_b14-jub-extraction-llog.rst
(replace NN with today's date)
Follow LLog Rules in CLAUDE.md: append-only, verbatim prompts.

BUILD CHECK: Run "make dev" after writing to check for RST errors.

PHASE 4 --- RETROSPECTIVE (do this LAST, append to the llog):

Answer the same 5 questions as previous retrospectives. Also answer:
6. Did the new category H (Formal Gaps) add value?
7. Was splitting needed? If so, where was the natural split point?
8. How did the multi-file corpus compare to sa2/sa3's single-file format?

Append recommendations to:
source/matheology/heaven/study/BB/extraction-lessons-learned-for-next-extractons.rst
(do NOT overwrite --- APPEND a new section for b14 lessons).

WHAT NOT TO DO:
- Do NOT write the paper --- that is a separate session
- Do NOT use "validate/verify" --- use "test/check" (Language Rule 4)
- Do NOT use YYYY-MM-DD dates --- use YYYYmMMdDD (Language Rule 6)
- Do NOT duplicate the full llog content --- extract, summarize, and point
- Do NOT skip smaller files --- they may contain critical naming or design decisions