Paper b12 — WoLC Reference Search Prompt (2026m04d05)

Copy the text below into a new Claude Code session to search for additional WoLC literature references for Paper b12. This is a RESEARCH session, not a writing session — it produces a report, not a paper revision.

/effort max

I need your help finding real, testable references from world literature
that independently recognize fragments of the Work-Logic Cascade (WoLC)
described in the e7Day model. This is a RESEARCH task, not a writing task.

BEFORE SEARCHING, read:
1. .claude/CLAUDE.md — especially Core Principle and Language Rules
2. The paper a2 MMv1 draft at
   source/matheology/hell/mm/b/12/study_mmv1_2026m04d05_a2-e7day-model-for-self-correcting.rst
   — read Section 1.2 (The Work-Logic Cascade) carefully
3. The extraction KB at
   source/matheology/hell/ll/study/b/12/study_ll_2026m04d04_a2-e7day-extraction-kb.rst
   — read the "Cross-Paper Connections" section at the end

CONTEXT: The WoLC is a 12-stage dependency hierarchy for system construction.
The 8 upper stages (axiomatized in e7Day) are:

   VOID -> TYPE -> EQUAL -> VALUE -> LOGIC -> CARE -> HOPE -> TRUST

The 4 lower stages (noted but not axiomatized) extend into the physical world:

   INFO -> TECH -> LIFE -> BASE

Where LIFE = Biology, BASE = Physics.

Two references are already in the paper:
- Bernal (1929) "The World, the Flesh and the Devil" — recognizes BASE (World)
  and LIFE (Flesh) as steered by higher levels, but lumps all higher levels
  as "the Devil"
- 1 Cor 13:13 — recognizes TRUST (faith), HOPE (hope), CARE (love) as
  permanent, with CARE as the greatest

TASK: Search for additional references that independently recognize other
WoLC fragments. For EACH candidate reference, I need:

1. Full bibliographic citation (author, title, year, publisher/journal)
2. Which WoLC stage(s) it maps to and HOW (structural correspondence, not
   superficial analogy)
3. What it gets RIGHT about the WoLC fragment
4. What it gets WRONG or INCOMPLETE (where it diverges from the WoLC)
5. Your confidence that the reference is REAL (you have NOT fabricated it)
   — rate as: CERTAIN (I know this work exists), LIKELY (I believe it exists
   but cannot guarantee exact bibliographic details), UNCERTAIN (I may be
   confusing it with something else). Be honest.

CANDIDATE AREAS TO INVESTIGATE (but do not limit yourself to these):

- Maslow's hierarchy of needs — does it map to VALUE/CARE/HOPE?
- Kohlberg's stages of moral development — does it map to LOGIC/HOPE?
- Piaget's cognitive development stages — does it map to TYPE/EQUAL/VALUE?
- Erikson's psychosocial stages — does it map to the full cascade?
- Wilber's integral theory (AQAL) — does it map to the WoLC?
- Spiral Dynamics (Graves/Beck/Cowan) — does it map to the cascade?
- Aristotle's "four causes" — does it map to any WoLC fragment?
- Hegel's dialectic — does VOID/TYPE map to thesis/antithesis/synthesis?
- Whitehead's "Process and Reality" — does the process cascade map?
- Teilhard de Chardin's "noosphere" layers — does it map to INFO/TECH/LIFE/BASE?
- Shannon/Weaver information theory — beyond what we already have for UMP
- Ashby's "Law of Requisite Variety" — does it map to EQUAL or CARE?
- Luhmann's social systems theory — does it map to CARE/HOPE/TRUST?
- Buddhist dependent origination (pratityasamutpada) — cascading dependencies?
- Confucian "five relationships" — does it map to any WoLC fragment?
- Islamic maqasid al-shariah (objectives of shariah) — does it map?
- Hindu purushartha (four aims of life) — does it map?
- African Ubuntu philosophy — does it map to CARE/HOPE?
- Indigenous "seven generations" thinking — does it map to TRUST/periodicity?

Also search for:
- Any hierarchical dependency model from systems theory, cybernetics, or
  complexity science that mirrors the WoLC structure
- Any developmental psychology model with a cascading dependency structure
- Any philosophical tradition with an ordered construction cascade

CRITICAL RULES:
- DO NOT MAKE UP REFERENCES. If you are not sure a reference exists, say so.
  A reference rated UNCERTAIN is infinitely more useful than a fabricated one.
- DO NOT force mappings. If a candidate does not genuinely map to any WoLC
  stage, say "no structural correspondence found" and move on.
- DO NOT use "validate" or "verify" — use "test" or "check" (Language Rule 4)
- DO NOT use bare "Jubilee" — use "the Jubilee System" (Language Rule 1)
- DO NOT use YYYY-MM-DD dates — use YYYYmMMdDD (Language Rule 6)
- Use web search tools to CHECK that references actually exist before
  including them. This is the most important step.

OUTPUT FORMAT: Save your report as an append to the study llog at
source/matheology/hell/ll/study/b/12/study_ll_2026m04d05_a2-e7day-llog.rst
(APPEND, do NOT overwrite — this is an append-only audit trail).

Organize the report as:
- A summary table mapping WoLC stages to the best candidate references
- Detailed entries for each candidate (using the 5-point template above)
- A recommendation section: which references are strong enough to add to
  paper a2's next revision, and which need further checking

Also create a separate llog for this session at
source/matheology/hell/ll/study/b/12/study_ll_2026m04dNN_a2-wolc-refs-llog.rst
(replace NN with today's date) following LLog Rules.

If web search is available, USE IT to check each reference. If not available,
clearly mark all references as needing human checking before use.