Integration Finding: PoR Field Real-World Usage Census#
Note
Data collection file. Agents performing the OOv1→OOv2 migration should append rows below whenever they attempt to populate a PoR field for any element. This file answers: which of the 40+ PoR fields are actually used in practice?
Question being answered: Is the PoR field set right-sized? Which fields are naturally filled by existing content, which require expert invention, and which remain empty stubs? Are there fields the PoR does NOT have but the content wants?
How to report: For each element migrated, record one row per PoR field attempted. Use the status codes below.
Status codes:
Y— field naturally populated from existing OOv1 contentI— field required expert invention (content exists but must be restructured or inferred)E— field remains an empty stub (no content available)N/A— field not applicable to this element type
For proposed new fields, append to the second table below.
Field Usage#
Element |
Field # |
Field name |
Status |
Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Title |
Y |
Already present in axioms.rst heading |
|
7 |
FormalNotation |
I |
Logic formula exists in prose but needs extraction into field |
|
14 |
SourceCitation |
Y |
Torah refs already inline |
|
30 |
AlignmentClassID |
E |
No cross-model alignment data exists yet |
(element) |
(field #) |
(field name) |
(Y/I/E/N/A) |
(brief explanation) |
Proposed New Fields#
Fields not in the current PoR registry (Section 9) that the migration suggests would be useful.
Proposed by |
Proposed name |
Why needed (what content wanted this field?) |
|---|---|---|
(agent/session) |
(field name) |
(describe the content that didn’t fit any existing field) |
Summary (to be written after migration completes)#
(Agents: after the migration is complete, write a summary addressing: How many fields are Y, I, E, N/A? Which fields are consistently empty across all elements? Which fields required the most invention? Are there clusters — e.g., “all POST fields are empty” or “all identity fields are Y”? How many new fields were proposed? Do any proposed fields overlap with existing fields that were merely poorly named?)