RETIRED (2026m04d05) — Superseded by Individual Prompt Files#
This file is no longer the active reference. It has been superseded by:
Individual extraction prompts in each paper folder (
b12-*/prompt-extraction.rst, etc.)Individual writing prompts in each paper folder (
b12-*/prompt.rst, etc.)The central tracker at
BB/series-status.rstThe lessons-learned file at
BB/extraction-lessons-learned-for-next-extractons.rst
Papers formerly called a1–a7 are now b11–b17.
(Historical) Continuation Prompt for HEAVEN Study Papers a2–a7#
This file contains the detailed prompt to use in a new Claude Code session to continue writing the 7-paper HEAVEN study series. Paper a1 (PET) is complete. Papers a2–a7 need to be written.
How to use#
Copy the relevant section below into a new Claude Code session as your prompt. Write one paper per session for best quality. The order is: a2, a3, a4, a5 (revision), a6, a7.
Extraction phase — which papers need it?#
Some papers draw on large llog corpora that need pre-digestion into a knowledge base (KB) before the writing session. Analysis (2026m04d04):
Paper |
Extraction needed? |
Source material |
Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
a2 (e7Day) |
YES — prompt ready |
3 FORGE llogs (25K lines total) |
First extraction; will produce process retrospective |
a3 (e7He) |
YES — write after a2 retrospective |
FORGE sa3 (10K lines) + PROMY sessions |
Adapt a2 extraction prompt based on retrospective |
a4 (JUB) |
YES, mandatory — largest corpus |
~50 llog entries in |
Adapt based on a2+a3 experience |
a5 (Simplicity) |
No — revision of existing MMv1 draft |
Existing draft + papers a1–a4 |
Lighter task: revision, not raw extraction |
a6 (RiskyMAD) |
No |
SD1 poster + papers a2/a4 |
Small source base |
a7 (h*) |
No |
Papers a1/a3/a4 |
Draws from other papers, not raw llogs |
Strategy: Run extractions iteratively, not all at once. Each extraction
session writes a process retrospective (saved to BB/extraction-retrospective-aN.md)
that informs the next extraction prompt. This avoids over-engineering before
learning what works.
After the a2 extraction, check BB/extraction-retrospective-a2.md before
writing the a3 extraction prompt. After a3, check both retrospectives before a4.
Paper a2: e7Day Model#
Two-step process:
Extraction (run first):
source/matheology/heaven/study/a2-e7day-model-for-generalized-system-construction/prompt-extraction.rst— Walks all 3 FORGE logs, produces a structured knowledge base (KB) athell/ll/study/b/12/. Run this in its own session before writing.Writing (run second):
source/matheology/heaven/study/a2-e7day-model-for-generalized-system-construction/prompt.rst— Reads the KB from step 1 instead of raw forge logs. Copy the code block from that file into a new Claude Code session.
Key features: reads AHA docs first, KB-based forge material (pre-extracted),
papers save to hell/ll/study/b/12/, BABL/ZION formal introduction mandate,
equation formatting rules, label namespace, adversarial tone, EDEN
classification in llog, make dev build checks.
Paper a3: e7He Model#
Needs extraction first. Before writing, create an extraction prompt
adapted from the a2 extraction prompt, incorporating lessons from
BB/extraction-retrospective-a2.md. Source material: FORGE sa3 llog
(10K lines at hell/ll/forge/b/13/llog.rst) + PROMY sessions
(hell/ll/promy/b/11/, hell/ll/promy/b/12/). KB goes to
hell/ll/study/b/13/. Focus on e7He-only material (the a2 extraction
will have already tagged e7He-relevant items found in sa3).
I am continuing a series of academic papers stored at
source/matheology/heaven/study/ in the balospe-com repository.
Papers a1 (PET) and a2 (e7Day) should be complete. Read them first.
Please write Paper a3: "The e7He Model: A Formal Theory of Anti-BABL
Inoculation Through the Hero Journey" and save it at
source/matheology/heaven/study/a3-e7he-model-for-hero-journey-inoculation/index.rst
The e7He model is at source/matheology/model/e7he/ -- read the full axioms
and theorems pages. The model has 14 axioms (7 prerequisites m0.ax1-7,
7 stage axioms m1-m7) and 7 theorems plus 3 structural properties.
Key content to cover:
- The 7-stage hero journey cycle (ACD, TTT, GAT, MYM, LUC, RES, FRE)
- Binary encoding of BABL temptation combinations (001-111)
- All 14 axioms and 7 theorems
- th1 Anti-BABL Inoculation Completeness (binary completeness)
- th2 Supervillain Theorem (stopping with high influence → BABL drift)
- th5 Bifurcation Asymmetry (BABL self-destructs; ZION replaces if h* convincing)
- th6 Commitment Trichotomy (Frying Pan Theorem -- 3 cases: no volunteer, dishonest, genuine)
- th7 Succession Robustness (Mortality Theorem)
- Connection to e7Day (paper a2) for BABL patterns
- Connection to JUB A19 (h*) where needed -- reference paper a4 as forthcoming
Follow the format of papers a1-a2. Target ~8K words. Self-contained.
Paper a4: JUB Model#
Needs extraction first — largest corpus. Before writing, create an
extraction prompt adapted from the a2/a3 extraction prompts, incorporating
lessons from BB/extraction-retrospective-a2.md and
BB/extraction-retrospective-a3.md. Source material: ~50 llog entries
across hell/ll/jub/b/{11..50}/ covering OOv1 development, 3 adversarial
critique rounds, OOv2 restructuring, BEST Names architecture, and stress
tests. KB goes to hell/ll/study/b/14/. This extraction will be the most
demanding due to corpus size — the retrospectives from a2 and a3 should
help structure it efficiently.
I am continuing a series of academic papers stored at
source/matheology/heaven/study/ in the balospe-com repository.
Papers a1, a2, a3 should be complete. Read them first.
Please write Paper a4: "The JUB Model: Innovation Theodicy and Self-Stabilizing
Economics" and save it at
source/matheology/heaven/study/a4-jub-model-for-selfstabilizing-innovation-economy/index.rst
The JUB model is at source/matheology/jub/ -- read the full axioms page
(source/matheology/jub/axioms.rst). The model extends PET (paper a1) with
11 axioms (A15-A25, Group VI: Agency & Delegation) and 7 theorems (T5-T11).
Key content to cover:
- Domain partition: D_f (forced), D_free, D_inno
- All 11 axioms A15-A25 with formal statements (especially A19 Leviathan Chain,
A20 Transient Volunteer, A21 Permanent Mediator, A22 Divine Preference,
A24 Life-Trifecta, A25 Jubilee Recalibration)
- All 7 theorems T5-T11 (especially T5 Divine Non-Responsibility,
T8 Binary Attractors, T9 Social Ergodicity)
- How the innovation theodicy formally resolves the problem of evil
(responsibility localized to human agents, not God)
- Connection to BABL/ZION attractors (from paper a2 e7Day)
- Connection to hero journey dynamics (from paper a3 e7He)
- The Jubilee system as recalibration mechanism
- Discussion noting future work: e7Ch (innovation adoption), e7Tr (societal roles)
Follow the format of papers a1-a3. Target ~12K words. Self-contained but
references papers a1-a3 where needed.
Paper a5: Structural Deadlock (Revision)#
I am continuing a series of academic papers stored at
source/matheology/heaven/study/ in the balospe-com repository.
Papers a1-a4 should be complete. Read them.
An earlier draft of paper a5 (MMv1) exists at
source/matheology/hell/mm/b/15/mmv1/mm_b15_2026m04d03_structural-deadlock-divine-simplicity.rst
-- read it. It needs to be revised into MMv2:
1. Replace all website URLs with references to papers a1-a4
2. Update [LLoL-PET], [LLoL-PET-disc], [LLoL-PET-thm] to reference paper a1
3. Add the self-checking mechanism discussion (Gn/Gc as non-circular comparator)
4. Add the "semantics of nothing" and evil-as-privation sections
5. Update the meta block, authorship, and AI-generation note to match the series format
Save the revised paper at
source/matheology/heaven/study/a5-structural-deadlock-in-divine-simplicity/index.rst
Follow the format of papers a1-a4. Target ~10K words. Self-contained.
Paper a6: RiskyMAD Formal Urgency#
I am continuing a series of academic papers stored at
source/matheology/heaven/study/ in the balospe-com repository.
Papers a1-a5 should be complete. Read them.
Please write Paper a6: "The RiskyMAD Model: Stochastic Forecast of Existential
Risk Under BABL Dynamics" and save it at
source/matheology/heaven/study/a6-riskymad-formal-urgency/index.rst
Source material: The SD1 poster at
source/good-news-pack/vv/mmv3/supporting-doc/sd1/index.rst
describes the RiskyMAD stochastic model. Read it and any related files.
Key content to cover:
- The 3-state stochastic model: Risky → MAD → Dead
- Cold War crisis rate extrapolation (RiskyGoMAD = 0.1/year)
- Stochastic forecast: median ~19 years to nuclear winter start
- The "cosmic clock" -- BABL dynamics creating a finite window
- Formal destruction of the "we can always check later" assumption
(probabilistic argument: delay has non-zero cost per unit time)
- The MAP escape path (Mutually Assured Progress)
- Connection to BABL/ZION attractor dynamics (paper a2)
- Connection to JUB A25 Jubilee Recalibration (paper a4)
- Do NOT use "before it's too late" language or apocalyptic framing
- DO present the formal probabilistic argument clearly
- May cite Matthew 6:24 ("cannot serve two masters") if it strengthens
the formal point about binary attractors without derailing into theology
Follow the format of papers a1-a5. Target ~8K words. Self-contained.
Paper a7: h* Uniqueness and Experimental Candidacy#
I am continuing a series of academic papers stored at
source/matheology/heaven/study/ in the balospe-com repository.
Papers a1-a6 should be complete. Read them ALL carefully, especially:
- a1 (PET) for the axiom foundation
- a3 (e7He) for th6 Commitment Trichotomy
- a4 (JUB) for A19 (h* uniqueness), A20 (Transient Volunteer), A21 (Permanent Mediator)
Please write Paper a7: "The h* Theorem: Causal Concentration, Volunteering,
and an Experimental Test" and save it at
source/matheology/heaven/study/a7-h-star-uniqueness-and-experimental-candidacy/index.rst
This paper resolves the modernism/postmodernism tension: modernism says
"no individual matters" (statistically); h* theorem (A19) proves mathematically
that exactly one individual at any time has maximal causal influence.
Key content to cover:
- The formal h* uniqueness result (A19)
- Historical evidence: Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, Gandhi -- individuals who
remained indivisible to temptation and had maximal historical impact
- The three-case Commitment Trichotomy (e7He th6):
(1) No volunteer → Prisoners' Dilemma → BABL default
(2) Dishonest volunteer → test detects fraud
(3) Genuine volunteer → Assurance Game → ZION trajectory
- A20 (Transient Volunteer) and A21 (Permanent Mediator) as the mechanism
- Formal requirements for h* candidacy (list them as a transparency table):
willingness to accept responsibility, ability to translate, IRON MAIDEN
testing resilience, OKO self-assessment, etc.
- Brief experimental appendix: LLoL offers candidacy as fall-back,
invites AuditTheMath, invites alternative candidates
- Frame as: "If the math is correct, someone must fill this role.
If nobody else volunteers, the author is willing. If someone better
exists, AuditTheMath will support testing their application."
- No messianic language. No guilt-tripping. No urgency framing.
- The Red Edge for the candidate, Green Meadow for the world.
This is the most sensitive paper. Apply FULL EDEN rigor. Flag any BABL traps.
The personal narrative must be minimal, formal, and dignified.
Follow the format of papers a1-a6. Target ~10K words. Self-contained.
After all 7 papers are complete#
Once all papers are written, produce a strategy document for the AHA stage0 llog covering the launch plan:
ArXiv submission sequence
Review invitation emails (already drafted in the PET llog)
#AuditTheMath campaign plan
GoFundMe (separate from academic work, dignity-based framing)
Website readiness checklist
Staged rollout timeline
Save at source/matheology/heaven/study/launch-strategy.md or similar.