Good News Sample MMv1 — 16-Page Introduction

The recommended first read for anyone encountering the Good News Pack — a curated 16-page sample covering the Open Letters Pack, Supporting Documents overview, a call to action, and the beginning of OL1.

Download the original document (PDF)

Warning

Large file: 7.6 MB PDF

Good News Sample MMv1 — PDF (7.6 MB) — 16 pages, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: good-news-sample-mmv1-iv_llol_2025m12d04-16page.pdf

WebP preview (228 KB)

Note

This is the primary exhibit page for the Good News Sample. The same PDF also exists at /_file/pdf/gnp/mmv3/good-news-sample/good-news-sample-mmv1-iv_llol_2025m12d04-16page.pdf and has a cross-reference page at Good News Sample — 16-Page Introduction to the Collection.

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhG_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract

The Good News Sample MMv1 is a curated 16-page document designed as the entry point for anyone encountering the Good News Pack for the first time. It condenses the scope and structure of the full collection into a single readable PDF.

The document is organized as follows:

• Pages 1–2: Open Letters Pack Cover — shows all 11 open letters (OL0–OL10) with their respective page counts, giving recipients an immediate overview of who was written to and how much material each letter contains.

• Page 3: Supporting Documents Overview — lists all 10 supporting documents (SD1–SD10), providing the evidence base and analytical frameworks that back the open letters’ claims.

• Page 4: Call to Action — a direct appeal to the reader, asking them to engage with the material and join the review process.

• Pages 5+: OL1 begins — the sample continues with Open Letter 1 (to US Presidents, Residents, and All), the foundational appeal for help in averting accidental nuclear winter by scaling up ResearchCity.

The document is labeled “Good News Sample MMv1” in its header and was included with every physical and digital mailing of the open letters.

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)

The Good News Sample solves a critical distribution problem: the full Good News Pack contains hundreds of pages across dozens of documents. No recipient can be expected to read everything before deciding whether to engage.

1. Curated entry point. By selecting the Open Letters overview, the Supporting Documents listing, a call to action, and OL1 specifically, the sample provides both the “what” (the collection structure) and the “why” (OL1’s argument about nuclear winter and ResearchCity) in a single document.

2. OL1 as lead document. Starting with OL1 rather than OL0 is a deliberate choice: OL1 is the broadest appeal (“to US Presidents, Residents, and All”) and contains the most comprehensive overview of the 7DUIs, ResearchCity, and the funding model.

3. Physical distribution design. At 16 pages (7.6 MB), this is large enough to be substantive but small enough to print and include in a mailing envelope alongside the open letters and USB stick.

Key Concepts at a Glance

Open Letters Pack (OL0–OL10)	11 open letters to world leaders, institutions, and the general public, shown with page counts on the cover pages
Supporting Documents (SD1–SD10)	10 analytical documents providing evidence, models, and legal frameworks backing the open letters
Call to Action	Direct appeal to readers to engage with the material and join the global review process
OL1	Open Letter 1 to US Presidents, Residents, and All — the foundational appeal that opens the sample’s substantive content
Good News Sample	The recommended first read — designed to orient new recipients before they explore the full Good News Pack

Document Information

Document ID	Good News Sample MMv1
Full title	Good News Sample — 16-Page Introduction
From	Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL)
To	All recipients of the Good News Pack
Version	iv_llol_2025m12d04
Format	16 pages (cover + overview + call to action + OL1)
License	Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain
Part of	Good News Pack MMv3, Files Shared by All Open Letters
PDF size	7.6 MB
WebP size	228 KB
Duplicate location	Also at /_file/pdf/gnp/mmv3/good-news-sample/good-news-sample-mmv1-iv_llol_2025m12d04-16page.pdf

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

• Good News Sample (standalone page) — the cross-reference page for this same PDF

• Files Shared by All Open Letters — the parent catalog page

• OL1 — Open Letter to US Presidents & All — the full exhibit page for OL1

• Open Letters Overview — all 11 open letters

• Don’t Panic Guide — the songbook that sets the tone

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhG_2026m04d16 —End—

Collapse all Expand all

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhG_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-ol-shared-good-news-sample] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-ol-shared-good-news-sample] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

• Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

• Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.