Address Labels OL0–OL6 — As Used for Physical Mailing on 2025m12d19#

Documentary evidence that the open letters were physically mailed to 7 recipients on 2025m12d19.

Download the original document (PDF)

Address Labels OL0–OL6 — PDF (80 KB) — 7 pages, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: address-labels-ol0-ol6-iv_llol_mmv1_2025m12d10-as-used-2025m12d19-7page.pdf

WebP preview (60 KB)

Address Labels OL0--OL6 as used for physical mailing on 2025m12d19

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhG_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract#

This 7-page document contains the address labels printed and used by Dr. Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL) at DARL for the physical mailing of open letters OL0 through OL6 on 2025m12d19. Each page shows one mailing label with the sender (LLoL at DARL), the recipient, and a brief message about averting nuclear winter.

The 7 recipients and their mailing addresses are:

  1. Page 1 — President Joe Biden (Greenville, Delaware 19807): recipient of OL0.

  2. Page 2 — US President Donald John Trump (The White House, Washington DC) via Chief of Staff Susie Wiles: recipient of OL1.

  3. Page 3 — Pope Leo XIV (Vatican City State) via Apostolic Nuncio Cardinal Christophe Pierre: recipient of OL2.

  4. Page 4 — PM Benjamin Netanyahu (Jerusalem, Israel) via Ambassador Yechiel Leiter: recipient of OL3.

  5. Page 5 — President Vladimir Putin (Moscow, Russia) via Ambassador Alexander Darchiev: recipient of OL4.

  6. Page 6 — UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres (New York) via UN Information Center: recipient of OL5.

  7. Page 7 — US Speaker Mike Johnson (Cannon House Office Building, Washington DC): recipient of OL6.

Each label includes a brief note connecting the mailing to the mission of averting accidental nuclear winter.

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)#

  1. Chain-of-custody evidence. The address labels serve as documentary evidence that LLoL followed through on the letters’ stated intentions: the open letters were not merely written but physically sent to their named recipients via verifiable postal addresses. This matters for the audit trail of the Good News Pack.

  2. Diplomatic routing visible. The labels reveal the actual diplomatic channels used — ambassadors, apostolic nuncios, chiefs of staff — showing that LLoL used proper institutional channels rather than attempting direct personal contact. This demonstrates awareness of protocol.

  3. Date-stamped accountability. The mailing date (2025m12d19) anchors the entire open letter series in a specific moment of action, making the Good News Pack a historically datable event rather than an undated collection of proposals.

Key Concepts at a Glance#

7 recipients

Biden, Trump, Pope Leo XIV, Netanyahu, Putin, Guterres, Johnson

Mailing date

2025m12d19

Sender

Dr. Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL) at DARL

Letters covered

OL0 through OL6 (the letters addressed to human recipients)

Routing

Via ambassadors, apostolic nuncios, and chiefs of staff where direct delivery was not possible

Purpose

Documentary evidence of physical mailing — part of the Good News Pack audit trail

Document Information#

Document ID

Address Labels (OL0–OL6 combo)

Full title

Address Labels OL0–OL6 — As Used 2025m12d19

Author

Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL), DARL

Created

2025m12d10

Used

2025m12d19 (physical mailing date)

Version

iv_llol_mmv1_2025m12d10

Format

7-page PDF, one address label per page

License

Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Part of

Good News Pack MMv3, Open Letters collection

PDF size

80 KB

WebP size

60 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhG_2026m04d16 —End—

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhG_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-ol-address-labels] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-ol-address-labels] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.