Flying Scroll 2 — Combo Cross / Guilt / Ark / 7E / Iron Rod (5 x 10 m)#

The theological and structural Flying Scroll posters combined into one wall-sized monumental composite.

Warning

Very large file: 19 MB PDF. This document is designed for professional large-format printing at 5 x 10 meters (approximately 16 x 33 feet). Download times may be significant on slower connections.

Download the original document (PDF)

Flying Scroll 2 — Cross/Guilt/Ark/7E/IronRod Combo — PDF (19 MB) — 1 page (5 x 10 m composite), Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: flying-scroll-2-combo-cross-guilt-ark-7e-ironrod-iv_llol_qqv1r3p1_2025m10d27-5x10m-20mb-web.pdf

WebP preview (344 KB)

Also in this folder: Flying Scroll 1 — Song Book (11 MB)

Flying Scroll 2 — Combo Cross/Guilt/Ark/7E/IronRod (5x10m wall-sized)

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhG_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract#

Flying Scroll 2 is the second of two wall-street-sized composite prints, also designed for monumental display at 5 x 10 meters. This version combines the theologically and structurally dense poster series from the Flying Scroll exhibit into a single seamless composition.

The composite tiles together posters from five thematic strands:

  • Cross — the redemptive framework at the center of the Good News Pack’s message

  • Guilt (MyGuilt signs A–D) — Posters E through H, the four-part guilt recognition series where LLoL takes personal responsibility for systemic problems

  • Ark — the Ark Manifest Destiny poster (Poster M), outlining the institutional vessel for the transition from BABL to ZION

  • 7E (Seven Epochs/Elements) — structural analysis of historical and prophetic patterns

  • Iron Rod — the guidance and navigation system for the Great Jubilee Race

Where Flying Scroll 1 (Song Book) provides the accessible gateway, Flying Scroll 2 contains the analytical and theological depth of the exhibit. Together, the two composites present the complete Flying Scroll visual program at monumental scale.

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)#

  1. Complementary pair. Flying Scroll 2 is the analytical counterpart to Flying Scroll 1’s invitational songbook theme. The pairing follows the Good News Pack’s pedagogical logic: entry through music and narrative (Scroll 1), then engagement with structure and argument (Scroll 2).

  2. Guilt series at scale. The MyGuilt signs (Posters E–H) are unusual in advocacy communication: they begin with the advocate’s own complicity rather than pointing outward. At wall scale, this self-critical starting point becomes unavoidable — literally larger than the viewer.

  3. Iron Rod as navigation. Including the Iron Rod series alongside the theological content positions it as the practical guidance system for the larger vision: not just “what is wrong” and “what could be right,” but “how to navigate from one to the other.”

Key Concepts at a Glance#

Cross

Redemptive framework central to the Good News Pack’s theological argument — the mechanism for transforming guilt into action

MyGuilt (A–D)

Four-part guilt recognition series (Posters E–H) where LLoL acknowledges personal responsibility for systemic failures

Ark

Institutional vessel concept for humanity’s transition from BABL (self-destruction) to ZION (self-stabilization)

7E

Seven Epochs/Elements analysis framework mapping historical and prophetic patterns across civilizational cycles

Iron Rod

Navigation and guidance system for the Great Jubilee Race — the practical tools for staying on a ZION path

5 x 10 m format

Professional large-format print size (approximately 16 x 33 feet), designed for exhibition walls and public installations

Document Information#

Document ID

Flying Scroll 2 — Combo Cross / Guilt / Ark / 7E / Iron Rod

Version

iv_llol_qqv1r3p1_2025m10d27

Format

1-page composite, 5 x 10 m physical size

License

Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Part of

Good News Pack MMv3, Flying Scroll collection

PDF size

19 MB

WebP size

344 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhG_2026m04d16 —End—

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhG_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-flyingscroll-wall-street-scroll-2] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-flyingscroll-wall-street-scroll-2] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.