Innovation Economics — Overcome BABL Idols to Win Jubilee Life in ZION

Single-page figure presenting a structured argument on how Yah may bind strongmen to the Greatest Law of Love via its economic equivalent, the Greatest Law of Innovation, with 8 civilizational scenarios.

Download the original document (PDF)

Innovation Economics — PDF (44 KB) — 1 page, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: innov-econ-overcome-babl-idols-to-win-jubilee-life-zion-iv_llol_ppv1r1_2024m03d01-page.pdf

WebP preview (248 KB)

Also in this folder: AIMS Ket, plus 9 Evolb deexcerptions

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhI_2026m04d16 —Start—

Abstract

This single-page figure presents a structured argument titled “Potential Contexts: How Yah may Bind Strongmen to the Greatest Law of Love via its Economic Equivalent, the Greatest Law of Innovation.”

The document is structured in lettered sections A–H:

A — The purpose of work: The purpose in people’s vocation to work is to innovate for sharing the good of creation, in order to keep improving how full, proper, regularly-scheduled 50-year Jubilees are implemented. Without this, the “bashmoling death-trifecta from the ever-winding worm in nothing” will destroy all fruits of innovation through inactive incurious ignorant indifference.

B — The three BABL idols:

• BAAL = OverSimplifying via Blindly Assuming Aggravating Leadership, growing LIEs (Least Inconvenient Explanations)

• ASHERA = OverComplicating via Automatic Stereotyping Habits Erroneously Rounding Against Hope, growing SINs (Structurally Inconsistent Notions)

• MOLOCH = OverReach via Mistakes Oppressing Life Ordering Cruel Habits, growing DEATH (Driven Evaluations Antagonizing Thoughtful Hypothesizing)

C — The self-assembling doomsday device: DEATH in overcomplicated decisions always precedes destruction in a system’s local Armageddon. It is inevitably triggered by not refusing to Include Self-Magnifying Ruining (ISMR) from the Tree of Knowledge-faking (ToK). This is “a self-assembling doomsday device, which is activated by ‘simply doing nothing’.”

D — The Jubilee solution: Yah gave Moses Lev.25 — a razor-sharp analysis of how to start escaping the death-spiral through Jubilees. ~3500 years later, humanity has reached “the end of the road in our Age of Laodicea, the Age of Conspiracies.”

E–H — Four remaining options (from Mt.24):

• E — Worst: Flee BABL on Sabbath (Yah explains what we could have done but were careless)

• F — Harsh: Flee BABL in Winter (we realize too late, can only record the disaster for future generations)

• G — Challenging: Flee BABL in great Tribulation (someone learns to read the signs, combines hot heart + cool mind per Rev.3:14–22)

• H — What will we do? LLoL’s personal response: “I decided to ask Yah to put me into the Isa.59 gap”

Key Concepts at a Glance

Greatest Law of Innovation	The economic equivalent of the Greatest Law of Love — innovating for sharing the good of creation
BAAL / ASHERA / MOLOCH	Three BABL idols mapping to OverSimplifying, OverComplicating, and OverReach respectively
LIEs / SINs / DEATH	The progressive output of BABL: Least Inconvenient Explanations grow Structurally Inconsistent Notions grow Driven Evaluations Antagonizing Thoughtful Hypothesizing
ISMR	Include Self-Magnifying Ruining — the mechanism by which BABL systems accumulate self-destruction from the ToK
Scenarios E–H	Four civilizational options from Mt.24, ranging from worst (too late) to challenging (narrow path via great tribulation)

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)

This figure is one of the most theologically and economically dense single pages in the Good News Pack. The mapping of BAAL, ASHERA, and MOLOCH to OverSimplifying, OverComplicating, and OverReach respectively gives the abstract BABL framework concrete historical and theological anchors. The four scenarios (E–H) provide a decision tree for civilizational outcomes that is both sobering and actionable — scenario G’s requirement of “hot heart + cool mind” (Rev.3:14–22) is a practical specification for what the Laodicean response would need to look like. The document’s core claim — that the Greatest Law of Love has an economic equivalent in the Greatest Law of Innovation — bridges theology and economics in a way that could be tested independently of its theological framing.

Document Information

Document ID	Innovation Economics Overview
Full title	Potential Contexts: How Yah may Bind Strongmen to the Greatest Law of Love via its Economic Equivalent
Author	Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL)
Date	2024m03d01
Version	iv_LLoL_PPv1r1_2024m03d01
Format	Single-page structured argument (sections A–H)
PDF size	44 KB
License	Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain
Part of	Good News Pack MMv3, Flying Scroll / Transwarp Key / STa4-REV

Related documents:

• STa4-REV — Stadium Overview

• Evolb Sample Deexcerptions

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhI_2026m04d16 —End—

Collapse all Expand all

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_ExhI_2026m04d16 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-twk-sta4-rev-innov-econ] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-twk-sta4-rev-innov-econ] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

• Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

• Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.