Poster X — The ZION Scopes Trial Innovation Game of the 7 ChangeStages

A 3x4ft visual poster presenting the 7 ChangeStages of innovation as described in Revelation 2–3, aligning the Works of God (refining fire, testing) with the Words of God (inspiring fire, building) around a central spiral.

Download the original document (PDF)

Poster X — 7ChangeStages — PDF (347 KB) — 1-page poster (3x4 ft), Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: poster-x-7changestages-7e-echoes-zion-scopes-trial-waldo-innov-game-iv_llol_oov1_2022m12d12-3x4ft.pdf

WebP preview (410 KB)

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —Start—

Abstract

Poster X presents the ZION Scopes Trial Innovation Game — a framework mapping the 7 ChangeStages of innovation as described in Revelation 2–3. The poster’s visual centerpiece is a large spiral connecting the 7 stages (Ephesus through Laodicea) with their innovation-stage equivalents, rotating between the Works of God (Refining Fire, Testing, Negative) and the Words of God (Inspiring Fire, Building, Positive).

Each of the 7 stages is described across multiple dimensions:

• Stage function: Speak New Truth (EPH), Wrestle Truth (SMY), Scale Truth (PER), Establish Truth (THY), Re-form Truth (SAR), Keep Truth (PHI), Recreate Truth (LAO)

• Innovation analogy: (a) what happens to the innovation, (b) what happens biologically, (c) what happens to the word/message, (d) what social structures are transcended

• ISMR avoidance: what overcomplication, oversimplification, or overreach to evade at each stage

• LIK tracking: the LAC Innovation Killertracker status at each stage, using a 4-bit BioBitOverviewLongTermTracker

• Church identity: the corresponding church from Revelation 2–3

The poster’s subtitle — “Balancing the GAME of the LAMB with the NAME of the LAMB” — defines GAME as Gracefully Accumulating Mechanistic Experience and NAME as Nondeceptively Asserting Mechanistic Expectations. The 4 Beings of Revelation 4:7 (Lion, Human, Eagle, Bull) appear as complementary innovation tool messages from the 4 Horns on God’s Altar.

Extensive footnotes reference ISMR (Including Self-Magnifying Ruining), the Evolvix DataOrientedInsightStorage (DOIS) system, and Neri Oxman’s “Age of Entanglement” (2016).

Key Concepts at a Glance

7 ChangeStages	Innovation mapped to Revelation 2–3: Speak, Wrestle, Scale, Establish, Reform, Keep, Recreate — each corresponding to a Church and a phase of truth development
GAME of the LAMB	Gracefully Accumulating Mechanistic Experience — the testing and refining dimension of innovation
NAME of the LAMB	Nondeceptively Asserting Mechanistic Expectations — the inspiring and building dimension of innovation
ISMR	Including Self-Magnifying Ruining — blind shortcuts that accumulate until systems collapse (cf. Titanic, WWI)
LIK (LAC Innovation Killertracker)	A 4-bit tracking system for minimizing Least Avoidable Complexity of ISMR in innovation
4 Beings (Rev. 4:7)	Lion, Human, Eagle, Bull — four complementary innovation tool messages mapped to Sciences, Design, Humanities, Engineering
Scopes Trial	Reference to the historic evolution trial, reframed as a metaphor for testing innovation claims in ZION’s court
LID (Lock-In Decision)	Formal innovation goal: decisions that become locked-in standards at each stage

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)

This poster is one of the earliest (2022) in the Flying Scroll collection and presents LLoL’s core innovation theory. Several features are notable:

1. Innovation as truth lifecycle. The progression from “Speak New Truth” through “Recreate Truth” frames innovation as fundamentally about truth development rather than product development. This connects scientific methodology to theological categories.

2. ISMR classification. Categorizing innovation failure modes as oversimplification, overcomplication, and overreach at each stage provides a systematic diagnostic framework. The stage-specific ISMR avoidance instructions are actionable.

3. The GAME/NAME duality. Distinguishing between accumulating experience (testing, negative) and asserting expectations (building, positive) captures the essential tension in any research program between exploration and exploitation.

4. Biological grounding. Mapping each stage to fundamental factors of evolution (mutation, selection, recombination, migration) connects innovation theory to evolutionary biology, which is LLoL’s academic specialty.

5. Dense information architecture. This is among the most information-dense posters in the collection. The spiral layout, with its multiple parallel tracks and cross-references, embodies the “slow-motion explosion” concept it describes.

Document Information

Document ID	Poster X (Flying Scroll)
Full title	The ZION Scopes Trial Innovation Game of the 7 ChangeStages
Subtitle	Balancing the GAME of the LAMB with the NAME of the LAMB
Author	Laurence Loewe of Laodicea (LLoL)
Dates	2022-12-12
Version	iv_LLoL_OOv1_2022m12d12 (also noted as MMr0p1)
Format	1-page wall poster, 3 x 4 ft (portrait)
License	Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain
Part of	Good News Pack MMv3, Flying Scroll collection
PDF size	347 KB
WebP size	410 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

• SD2 — Epiocracy (defines the governance framework)

• SD7 — 7 Resilience Healing (7 stages reappear)

• SD8 — ResearchCity Stadia (stadia architecture)

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —End—

Collapse all Expand all

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-flyingscroll-page-poster-x] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-flyingscroll-page-poster-x] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

• Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

• Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.