The 7 Tribes Model for Troubleshooting an Innovation Economy — 3-Page Extract#

A 3-page extract (pp. 10–11, 57) from the Guyer-Loewe study, providing the formal definitions of all 7+2 Tribes and a summary overview table.

Download the original document (PDF)

7Tribes Model — 3-Page Extract — PDF (71 KB) — 3 pages, Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: loewe-guyer-2022m05d06_r2-the-7tribes-model-for-troubleshooting-innovation-economy-3page.pdf

WebP preview (71 KB)

The 7 Tribes Model for Troubleshooting an Innovation Economy — 3-Page Extract

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —Start—

Abstract#

This 3-page extract (pages 10, 11, and 57) from the full 57-page Guyer-Loewe study provides the formal definitions of all 7+2 Tribes in the 7Tr model. Section 2.4 presents each role with its Hebrew tribal name, literal translation, functional synonym, and descriptive definition:

  • 1 Amorite \ TopSpeaker \ PowerElite — the top influencers and thought leaders who most determine the direction of how the system evolves

  • 2 Hittite \ FearHandler \ RiskReducer — courageous andOr sometimes fear-inducing policy enforcers who reduce defined risks

  • 3 Canaanite \ ProfitTrader \ Distributor — merchants, service-providers, andOr other trading deal-makers

  • 4 Pherezite \ OpenDecider \ PureExpert — hold the most knowledge and seek to excel; in danger of acting like a KnowItAll

  • 5 Jebusite \ Stampeder \ RoutineMarket — the most established and risk-averse approach; predictable, inflexible, but reliable

  • 6 Hivite \ RotatingTentVillager \ TempRotator — very flexible, seeking to make the most of arising opportunities

  • 7 Girgashite \ CrushedDust \ IgnoredOthered — contribute to others’ success at significant disadvantage to their own

The two additional roles prevent fossilization:

  • Hebrew \ Beyonder \ AnyRoleWalker — curious individuals who walk in any tribe’s track, exploring beyond the horizon through unconventional approaches

  • Israelite \ RealityWrestler \ AllRolesRefiner — bring the strength of Hebrew thinking-out-of-the-box with the restraint of superrational saints who build solutions stable over the long term

Page 57 provides a summary overview table (Appendix 4) listing all roles with their Brief code, Technical Name, Explicit Name Synonyms, Strengths, Weaknesses, and Cases of Use.

Key Concepts at a Glance#

7Tr Model

A model for describing the functional roles in any innovation society, inspired by the names of the 7 tribes in the Hebrew Bible’s “promised land”

Nomen est omen

The principle that names carry meaning — the foundation of the 7Tr model’s derivation from Hebrew tribal names

Fossilization problem

Entrenched interests and accidental oversimplifications can fossilize into information barriers maintained with “we have always done it this way” — the failure mode the HEB and ISR roles are designed to prevent

OLT stability

Over the Long Term stability — the ISR role’s key strength: building solutions that work for everybody, not only a privileged majority

Backslash notation

LLoL’s Evolvix syntax convention where backslash separates alternative names for the same concept (e.g., Amorite\TopSpeaker\PowerElite)

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)#

This 3-page extract is the most academically formal presentation of the 7Tribes model in the Good News Pack:

  1. Definitional clarity. Unlike the dense infographics elsewhere, this extract provides paragraph-length definitions for each role with explicit caveats about evidential limitations. The statement that functional aspects “do not claim to reflect equivalently detailed historic evidence” shows scholarly caution rare in the broader Good News Pack.

  2. The HEB-ISR distinction. The careful distinction between Hebrew (creative but potentially unruly boundary-crosser) and Israelite (disciplined, superrational, long-term-focused) is particularly clear here. This distinction is central to the broader LLoL framework — HEB explores possibilities; ISR refines them into stable solutions.

  3. The fossilization argument. The claim that 7 roles are sufficient for a working innovation society “in any given point in time” but that long-term stability requires the HEB and ISR anti-fossilization roles is an interesting structural argument about why systems need built-in mechanisms for self-renewal.

  4. The summary table. Appendix 4’s overview table (p. 57) is a compact reference that maps Brief codes, Technical Names, Explicit Names, Strengths, Weaknesses, and Cases of Use — making it a useful quick-reference for anyone working with the 7Tr model.

Document Information#

Document ID

7Tribes Model — 3-Page Extract (Extra Good News)

Full title

The 7 Tribes Model for Troubleshooting an Innovation Economy (3-page extract: pp. 10–11, 57)

Authors

Laurence Loewe (model definitions), Sara Guyer (co-author of full study)

Date

2022-05-06 (revision 2)

Version

Draft v0r2p0 — 2022-05-05

Format

3-page extract with definitions and summary table

License

Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Part of

Good News Pack MMv3, Extra Good News collection

PDF size

71 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 —End—

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46Max_MMv2_2026m04d02 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

  1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

  2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

  3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-extra-good-news-7track-roles-7tribes-model] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-extra-good-news-7track-roles-7tribes-model] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

  • Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

  • Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.