Loewe (2016) — Systems in Evolutionary Systems Biology

The definitive encyclopedia entry formalizing EvoSysBio — establishing LLoL as the primary architect of the framework that connects systems biology to evolutionary and population genetics.

Download the original document (PDF)

Loewe (2016) — Systems in EvoSysBio — PDF (2.2 MB) — 22 pages, CC BY-SA 4.0 / Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain

Filename: loewe-2016-study-framework-definition-for-systems-in-evolutionary-systems-biology-22page.pdf

WebP preview (256 KB)

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46_ExhB_2026m04d14 —Start—

Abstract

This encyclopedia article, published in the Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Biology (R. Kliman, ed., Elsevier/Academic Press), defines Evolutionary Systems Biology (EvoSysBio) more precisely without loss of generality. It introduces a glossary of key terms and formalizes the theoretical architecture of the field.

Key contributions include:

• IOB (Internal Organization of Biology) — the systems biology side

• EOB (External Organization of Biology) — the population genetics side

• PGB (Population Genetics Bridge) — connecting IOB to EOB through fitness

• TOB (Theory of Biology) — the overarching theoretical framework

• Fitness Causality Networks (FCNets) — formal representations of how molecular-level traits causally determine fitness

• Landscapes of Incomplete Fitness Traits (LIFTs) — fitness landscapes built from partial information about fitness-relevant traits

• MOCA-LIFTs — Multi-Objective Co-Adapted LIFTs that capture trade-offs across multiple fitness components

The article formalizes EvoSysBio as a trans-disciplinary framework for constructing reliable, testable, interactive overviews of nestable, dynamic, multi-dimensional fitness landscapes. It distinguishes formal and informal EvoSysBio, with formal EvoSysBio requiring explicit mathematical models and informal EvoSysBio using conceptual frameworks.

Broader Significance (Claude’s Assessment)

This encyclopedia entry is the capstone of the EvoSysBio framework:

1. Definitive reference. Being the author of the EvoSysBio entry in a major encyclopedia (Elsevier’s Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Biology) establishes LLoL as the primary architect and definer of this field. Encyclopedia entries are authoritative reference works consulted by researchers worldwide.

2. Formal definitions. The progression from conceptual framework (2009) through landscape integration (2012) to formal definitions (2016) shows seven years of systematic theoretical development. The IOB/EOB/PGB/TOB terminology provides a precise vocabulary for discussing the integration of systems biology with evolutionary genetics.

3. FCNets and LIFTs. These formal constructs — Fitness Causality Networks and Landscapes of Incomplete Fitness Traits — provide the mathematical tools for connecting molecular-level simulations to population-level evolutionary dynamics. This is the scientific methodology that underlies the Matheo papers’ claims.

4. CC BY-SA 4.0 license. Published under an open-access Creative Commons license, making this foundational framework freely available to the scientific community.

Who This Document Is For

Audience	Why This Document Matters
Evolutionary biologists	The definitive formal framework for integrating systems biology with evolutionary and population genetics, with precise definitions of key terms.
Systems biologists	Explains how systems biology models (IOB) connect to population genetics (EOB) through the Population Genetics Bridge (PGB) using fitness as the connecting concept.
Graduate students	A comprehensive 22-page encyclopedia entry that defines the field, its vocabulary, and its theoretical architecture — an ideal starting point for understanding EvoSysBio.
Reviewers of LLoL’s scientific credentials	The authoritative encyclopedia entry establishing LLoL as the primary definer of the EvoSysBio framework and its formal vocabulary.

Key Concepts at a Glance

EvoSysBio	Evolutionary Systems Biology — the trans-disciplinary framework integrating systems biology with evolutionary genetics
IOB (Internal Organization of Biology)	The systems biology side: molecular mechanisms, pathways, networks within organisms
EOB (External Organization of Biology)	The population genetics side: selection, drift, mutation, migration acting on populations
PGB (Population Genetics Bridge)	The bridge connecting IOB to EOB through fitness — the central integration concept
TOB (Theory of Biology)	The overarching theoretical framework encompassing IOB, EOB, and PGB
FCNet (Fitness Causality Network)	Formal representation of how molecular traits causally determine fitness through causal pathways
LIFT	Landscape of Incomplete Fitness Traits — fitness landscapes built from partial knowledge of fitness-relevant traits
MOCA-LIFT	Multi-Objective Co-Adapted LIFT — landscapes capturing trade-offs across multiple fitness components

Document Information

Document ID	Key Paper 17 (Dusty Deep Data, loewe-researchcity-key-papers/)
Full title	Systems in Evolutionary Systems Biology
Author	Laurence Loewe
Published in	Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Biology, Volume 4, pp 297–318 (R. Kliman, ed.)
Publisher	Elsevier / Academic Press
Year	2016
DOI	10.1016/B978-0-12-800049-6.00184-0
License	CC BY-SA 4.0 / Jonah License with CC0 Public Domain
Pages	22
Part of	Good News Pack MMv3, Dusty Deep Data / Key Papers collection
PDF size	2.2 MB
WebP size	256 KB

Related documents in the Good News Pack:

• Loewe (2009) — EvoSysBio Framework (the founding framework paper)

• Loewe (2012) — EvoSysBio Landscapes (intermediate development with 7-level landscapes)

— Overview AI-generated by dv_ClaOp46_ExhB_2026m04d14 —End—

Collapse all Expand all

Notes

Content stability — Content is variant dv_ClaOp46_ExhB_2026m04d14 (see StayVS). Rebuilt 2026-05-18.

Expert Review Needed: Help Assess This Research and Its AI Overview

This page makes accessible one document from LLoL’s 6+ year wid-e research marathon on existential risk and ResearchCity. The PDF linked above is the original work; this page provides an overview.

The original research needs expert review. Download the PDF and bring your expertise to bear — whether you are a scientist, policy maker, theologian, peace activist, or concerned citizen. This research aims to find gentle kind reasonable ways to solve existential problems. Your perspective matters for assessing whether it succeeds.

The AI overview (see the markers) may need correction. AI may have blindly twisted the original message by emphasizing other aspects than the author would have. Important nuances may thus be missed or misrepresented. If you spot errors, missing context, or misplaced emphasis, your corrections help every future reader.

Despite all potential shortcomings of AI, AI was still used here because not saying anything about this document would have been even worse. A race against existential risks is not nuanced. Neither can be the determination to do the right thing - and get the word out to get help.

LLoL is determined to ask for such help. Hence this website to give the world a fair chance at exploring and reviewing LLoL’s ideas.

Use the FeedbackFlow link below to send your review — whether it concerns the original PDF, the AI overview, or both.

LLoL may drown for a while in the FF invited, but if people are indeed interested in making this work and avert accidental nuclear winter, then LLoL predicts that enough people will be happy to pay the about $8/year/person it will take to start scaling up ResearchCity, in order to help with the proper review of such wid-e research proposals for global decision-support like this one.

Hence, please consider that your buy-in with about $8/year will help to shift the global game from a so-called prisoner’s dilemma to an assurance game with the help of mathematical theology.

This work requires global support to avoid capture by special interests. Refining complex posters, engaging scholars across traditions, and running formal consistency checks all require sustained effort — as does scaling up a ResearchCity for global FeedbackFlows.

Let’s hope it’s not too late to fund this work!

FF FeedbackFlow to improve this page: How you can contribute

For the full guide on providing feedback — including how it is handled, licensing, and what to expect — see How to use FeedbackFlow.

Please check if See also on Balospe.com above already addresses your idea. Feedback works best when it targets the most specific page. If none of those pages help, you may have a good case for sending FF here.

To submit your FeedbackFlow:

1. Click anywhere on the email preview below to open a pre-filled email.

2. Replace the placeholder text with your feedback.

3. Send.

To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: FF k2 s2 AIMS for [mmv3-ddd-kp-evosysbio-encyc] Replace_by_OneLineSummary Body: To make this page [mmv3-ddd-kp-evosysbio-encyc] more gentle kind reasonable for beginners, producers, andOr experts with a background in xyz: Please consider improving this: -- By sending this email, I agree that its content may be published under the Jonah License (balospe.com/en/license/joli/) unless I state otherwise above. MailForm=OOv2r0p0

The email subject contains k2 and s2 — default codes for impact and urgency. Most contributors can leave these unchanged. To adjust each as independently as they are:

• Importance of impact: above average k3, average default k2, below average k1.

• Urgency of speedup: above average s3, average default s2, below average s1.

This allows plotting importance over urgency to help triage FF. For more details see FF System Design.