The Datageddon Wall of Revelation#
Before any of this was a website, before the MMv3 Good News Pack and the MMv5 Matheo Study Series, it was a wall of books. LLoL assembled it in 2022 as a working instrument — not décor, but a research bench — to test whether the biblical book of Revelation could be read as a coherent, non-violent strategic map rather than a prophecy of doom.
This page exists to make that wall findable and to preserve, in LLoL’s own words, the caption he wrote for it in 2024. It is the earliest form in the lineage of reformattings that the HEAVEN section traces — the seed-bed of the ideas, in the most literal, physical sense.
A personal statement, in LLoL’s own voice — offered for testing
The caption below is LLoL’s verbatim 2024 text. It is a personal, first-person statement and reads like one. As the caption itself insists, it is not asking to be taken on trust — it explicitly calls for the widest possible “reviewing to carry” by as many scholars as it takes. Read it as a hypothesis its author is staking his work on, not as a settled claim.
LLoL’s Datageddon Wall of Revelation. Photographed 2022m10d27 — the 60th anniversary of Vasili Arkhipov’s refusal to launch.#
Fig.F4 — LLoL’s verbatim 2024 caption#
My Datageddon Wall of Revelation is a vital resource for averting Armageddon through a funny non-violent Jonah-Esther-Exodus re-interpretation of the otherwise dark and disastrous biblical book of Revelation. Given its reputation for resisting decryption for 2 millennia, most have given up on a chance of anyone understanding it. By accident I stumbled upon what I call the abstract “Rosetta 7Stone of the Revelation of RealQuestAnswer”, which allows me to deexcerpt texts from Revelation with remarkable consistency for our time. This effort is imperfect as illustrated by this wall of books. It was assembled (a) to see if anyone else discovered a similarly ground-breaking reinterpretation (not to my knowledge, rows 1-4) and (b) to help me better understand how to interpret the highly advanced mathematical theology of Revelation as a strategic map for the Second Exodus by connecting it to observations in science, engineering, design, humanities and history (rows 5-7). To most readers of Revelation this seems many books to understand 1 book, but Rev. is like a master-index for what was said before and serious researchers see in my collection myriad gaps of essential contributions. Given that theology breeds methodology breeds expectation breeds eschatology breeds destiny, it is crucial for averting nuclear war to develop a non-violent eschatology in order to discover the MAP solution I propose for Mutually Assured Progress. Given my experience so far, this MAP solution can’t be explained. It must be seen in action. I was extremely fortunate to have had life and research experiences that allowed me to connect the dots all over this wall to make sense of it. My eclectic idiosyncratic mix is likely so rare that it is far from a given that anyone else will any time soon stumble across a similarly powerful superrational system. The world is free to take its chances and ignore what I have to say, but I can’t recommend it in light of the substantial risk that I am indeed the first one to have stumbled across a superrational solution for solving the nuclear roulette problem. I also don’t recommend blindly taking my word for it. Therefore: It would be best to support as many scholars as it takes to openly wid-e review my ideas in order to ensure that my research holds up to scrutiny. Technically, like any scientist, I am a false prophet in the Spirit of Boolean Truth until proven correct on occasion. Note the difference between “reviewing to bury” and “reviewing to carry” by constructive criticism. I am only 1 person. I can’t possibly integrate the feedback flow from thousands of smart reviewers. Hence, work to envision how to do this by scaling up ResearchCity in 7 stages to standardize info processing protocols designed for reliability based on my Evolvix research to improve semantic reproducibility for bioreasoning. Scientists who balk at so much reviewing of uncertainty in Revelation may consider my other motive: As the core language architect of Evolvix it is my responsibility to ensure Evolvix as a language for biouncertainty indeed captures all potential edge-cases. This requires good test cases. I identified Revelation as hardest test-case for how well Evolvix can capture the most bizarre and complex patterns of uncertainty imaginable. If Evolvix can formally represent in a navigable useful alignment all texts related to Revelation’s original 9851 words, the Evolvix syntax will have passed a key milestone towards representing any possible edge-case in real biological data. Photo on 2022-10-27, 60th anniversary of Vasili Arkhipov Day, when WW3 was won.
—LLoL, 2024
Where this leads#
The wall is the before of a long reorganization. Its contents were first made shareable as the MMv3 Good News Pack (2025), then recompiled into the auditable MMv5 Matheo Study Series (2026). How that pattern of re-pouring the same ideas into ever more navigable form relates to the Jubilee System is told on the Jubilees-in-action page. How the wall’s reading of Revelation connects to present-day existential threats is on the Prophecy page.