.. Migration note (2026m04d04): Claude copied this file during VV-to-HELL migration.
Old path: ``vv/jub/oov2/llog/2I-por-field-testing.rst`` (as given by LLoL)
New path: ``hell/ll/jub/b/47/jub_ll_2026m03d23_2I-por-field-testing.rst`` (as chosen by Claude)
Category: JUB OOv2 log
.. meta::
:description: PoR field testing across all 32 formal elements ax1_A1-ax25_A25 and th5_T5-th11_T11, assessing which of 45 AHA-specified fields are populated and which remain stubs.
:keywords: PoR fields, field coverage, Phase 2I-2, AHA specification, ax1_A1-ax25_A25, th5_T5-th11_T11, stub detection, JUB OOv2, formal elements, Claude Opus, llog
:author: Yah, Yas, everyone, LLoL as Laurence Loewe of Laodicea, ClaudeOp46Max, Anthropic, and Spirit of Boolean Truth
:og:card:title: PoR Field Testing Report
45 Fields x 32 Elements
:og:card:description: Which of the 45 AHA-specified PoR fields are naturally populated across all axioms and theorems? This report maps coverage and identifies gaps.
.. SOCIAL-CARD-QUALITY-COMPARE --- OO (default effort) vs PP (max effort), 2026-03-26
OO :description: PoR field testing report assessing coverage of 45 AHA-specified fields across all 32 formal elements ax1_A1-ax25_A25 and th5_T5-th11_T11.
OO :keywords: matheology, JUB, OOv2, Phase 2I-2, PoR fields, testing, field coverage, ax1_A1-ax25_A25, th5_T5-th11_T11, llog
OO :og:card:title: Phase 2I-2: PoR Field Testing Report
OO :og:card:description: Assessment of PoR field coverage across 32 formal elements, identifying which fields are naturally populated and which remain stubs.
PP :description: PoR field testing across all 32 formal elements ax1_A1-ax25_A25 and th5_T5-th11_T11, assessing which of 45 AHA-specified fields are populated and which remain stubs.
PP :keywords: PoR fields, field coverage, Phase 2I-2, AHA specification, ax1_A1-ax25_A25, th5_T5-th11_T11, stub detection, JUB OOv2, formal elements, Claude Opus, llog
PP :og:card:title: PoR Field Testing Report
45 Fields x 32 Elements
PP :og:card:description: Which of the 45 AHA-specified PoR fields are naturally populated across all axioms and theorems? This report maps coverage and identifies gaps.
.. SOCIAL-CARD-REVIEW --- generated by Claude Opus 4.6, 2026-03-26
dv_ClaOp46_PP_2026m03d26 --- max-effort rewrite, read full page.
:description: 147 chars | :og:card:title: 44 chars (excl
)
- [ ] PP title more compelling than OO title
- [ ] PP description more accurate than OO description
- [ ] Description hooks without misleading
- [ ] Keywords specific to this page's actual content
- [ ] No language rule violations
- [ ] Character counts verified
.. _2I-por-field-testing:
*********************************************************************
Phase 2I-2: PoR Field Testing Report
*********************************************************************
Generated in two sessions by Claude Opus 4.6:
- **Part A** (fields 1--18): 2026-03-25
- **Part B** (fields 19--45) and combined report: 2026-03-25
**VVN:** ``dv_ClaudeOpus4.6_OOv2r0p0_2026m03d25``
**Source files assessed:**
- ``source/matheology/pet/axioms.rst`` --- PoR for ax1_A1--ax14_A14
- ``source/matheology/jub/axioms.rst`` --- PoR for ax15_A15--ax25_A25
- ``source/matheology/jub/theorems.rst`` --- PoR for th5_T5--th11_T11
- ``source/matheology/jub/quest.rst`` --- selective (con/pro labels, citations)
- ``source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/aha-best-names-for-matheology-links.rst`` --- AHA field definitions
- ``source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2G-stress-test-math.rst`` --- mathematical rigor stress-test
- ``source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2G-stress-test-feasibility.rst`` --- feasibility stress-test
- ``source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2G-stress-test-dispositions.rst`` --- disposition audit
- ``source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/llog_2026m03d22_restructuring-2F-critique3-c3-1-c3-7.rst`` --- C3.1--C3.7 integration
- ``source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/llog_2026m03d22_restructuring-2G-2H-stress-tests-summary-freeze.rst`` --- StayVS assessments
**Note on element count:** This report covers 32 formal elements (ax1_A1--ax25_A25, th5_T5--th11_T11),
matching Part A. th1_T1--th4_T4 (PET theorems) are outside the scope of this assessment.
.. contents:: On this page
:depth: 2
:local:
----
.. container:: verbatim-prompt
Phase 2I-2b: PoR Field Testing --- Operational, Network, Analytical
.. note::
**200K-token execution prompt.** Copy-paste everything below the
horizontal rule into a new Claude Code session.
**Prerequisite:** Phase 2I-2a must have completed and written its
partial report to
``source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2I-por-field-testing-part-a.rst``
**Token budget:** ~100K. Reads the stress-test and critique
files (which contain the operational/analytical evidence) plus
the Part A report. Does NOT re-read the full PoR source files.
.. code-block:: rst
----
/clear
/compact
/effort max
You are executing Phase 2I-2b of the JUB OOv2 matheology project:
**PoR field testing, Part B.** This session tests fields
19--45 (Operational State, Network & Versioning, Analytical)
against the stress-test output, critique integration, and quest
structure.
This session does NO migration or code changes. It reads, analyses,
and produces the COMBINED final testing report.
====================================================================
STEP 0 --- READ ALL REQUIRED FILES (DO THIS FIRST)
====================================================================
ax1_A1. AHA DESIGN DOC (field definitions, Section 11) --- READ IN FULL:
source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/aha-best-names-for-matheology-links.rst
ax2_A2. PART A REPORT (fields 1--18 already tested) --- READ IN FULL:
source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2I-por-field-testing-part-a.rst
ax3_A3. STRESS-TEST MATH --- READ IN FULL:
source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2G-stress-test-math.rst
ax4_A4. STRESS-TEST FEASIBILITY --- READ IN FULL:
source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2G-stress-test-feasibility.rst
ax5_A5. STRESS-TEST DISPOSITIONS --- READ IN FULL:
source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2G-stress-test-dispositions.rst
ax6_A6. CRITIQUE INTEGRATION (C3.1--C3.7) --- READ IN FULL:
source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/llog_2026m03d22_restructuring-2F-critique3-c3-1-c3-7.rst
ax7_A7. JUB QUEST (for con/pro references and network) --- SELECTIVE:
source/matheology/jub/quest.rst
Use grep to find all ``.. _con-`` and ``.. _pro-`` labels and
any ``:ref:`` cross-references between elements. Read 5-line
context around each. Do NOT read the full file (~48K tokens).
ax8_A8. 2G-2H SUMMARY (for StayVS assessments) --- READ IN FULL:
source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/llog_2026m03d22_restructuring-2G-2H-stress-tests-summary-freeze.rst
====================================================================
STEP 1 --- BUILD COVERAGE MATRIX: FIELDS 19--45
====================================================================
For EACH axiom (ax1_A1--ax25_A25) and EACH theorem (th5_T5--th11_T11), assess
coverage for fields 19--45:
**Group 4: Operational State (fields 19--29)**
19. ``limit`` --- known limitations, assumptions
20. ``jj`` --- current blocker for this element
21. ``aa`` --- next steps, tasks
22. ``kk`` --- identified trap and avoidance
23. ``ff`` --- collected feedback to process
24. ``cc`` --- background reading from others
25. ``dd`` --- architectural decision for this element
26. ``gg`` --- promising draft not yet integrated
27. ``hh`` --- recently deprecated content
28. ``ww`` --- what would break if this changed
29. ``yy`` --- test case for reliability checking
**Group 5: Network & Versioning (fields 30--40)**
30. ``netout`` --- upstream dependencies (builds on)
31. ``netin`` --- downstream dependents (used by)
32. ``stayc`` --- StayVS maturity code
33. ``mento`` --- stage-appropriate learning guidance
34. ``diff`` --- what changed from prior versions
35. ``ll`` --- links to relevant llog sessions
36. ``con`` --- objection addressing this element
37. ``pro`` --- response defending this element
38. ``vv`` --- all VVNs for this element
39. ``vvnow`` --- pointer to latest version
40. ``model`` --- which model(s) use this element
**Group 6: Analytical (fields 41--45)**
41. ``conv`` --- where traditions agree/diverge
42. ``bib`` --- academic references
43. ``pol`` --- known active policy discussions
44. ``his`` --- historical analysis
45. ``doi`` --- permanent stable identifier
Use the same scoring: F/P/S/N.
====================================================================
STEP 2 --- NETWORK GRAPH EXTRACTION
====================================================================
For fields 30--31 (netout/netin), build the actual dependency
graph by reading the PoR content and stress-test analysis:
1. For each axiom, list which other axioms it depends on (netout)
and which theorems/axioms depend on it (netin).
2. Every edge must be justified with a specific reason (e.g.,
"th1_T1 depends on ax5_A5 because the proof invokes ax5_A5's containment
property").
3. List any edges that are uncertain or disputed.
4. Note any missing edges (elements that appear isolated but
probably should not be).
====================================================================
STEP 3 --- COMBINED GAP ANALYSIS
====================================================================
Merge the Part A findings with your Part B findings:
1. **Critical gaps:** Fields rated "Stub" for >50% of elements
(across all 45 fields)
2. **Quick wins:** Fields rated "Partial" that could become "Full"
with targeted work
3. **Source-text gaps by tradition** (from Part A)
4. **Network completeness** (from Step 2)
5. **StayVS coverage:** Do the 2G-2H assessments cover all 32
elements?
6. **Operational field patterns:** Are the POST fields (jj, aa,
kk, etc.) populated from the stress-test outputs, or are they
systemically empty?
====================================================================
STEP 4 --- EXTRACTION DIFFICULTY (ALL 45 FIELDS)
====================================================================
Combine Part A's difficulty ratings (fields 1--18) with your
ratings for fields 19--45. Present the full 45-row table:
field, difficulty, source files, notes.
====================================================================
STEP 5 --- WRITE COMBINED FINAL REPORT
====================================================================
Create the FINAL combined report at:
source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2I-por-field-testing.rst
Contents:
1. Title: "Phase 2I-2: PoR Field Testing Report"
2. Generated-by line (note: produced in two sessions, 2I-2a + 2I-2b)
3. **Complete coverage matrix** (all 32 elements |times| all 45 fields)
--- merge Part A's fields 1--18 with your fields 19--45
4. Gap analysis (6 sections from Step 3)
5. Network dependency graph (from Step 2)
6. Complete extraction difficulty table (all 45 fields)
7. Recommendations for Phase 3 priority ordering
8. Any proposed changes to the 45-field structure
Then REMOVE the partial Part A file:
Rename ``2I-por-field-testing-part-a.rst`` to
``deprecated/2I-por-field-testing-part-a.rst`` (do not delete).
====================================================================
STEP 6 --- UPDATE LLOG INDEX
====================================================================
Add the final report to the toctree in:
source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/index.rst
Under the "Phase 2I: Post-Processing" section.
====================================================================
CRITICAL RULES
====================================================================
1. llog files are APPEND-ONLY.
2. NEVER delete content files. Move to deprecated/ instead.
3. This session READS and ANALYSES only. The files you CREATE are
the final report (and deprecated move of Part A).
4. The combined report must be ONE file containing the complete
matrix. Do not leave it split across two files.
5. NEVER abbreviate prompts in llogs.
6. LANGUAGE RULES:
a. NEVER use bare "Jubilee" as standalone noun.
b. NEVER use "the" for unproven superlatives.
----
1. Complete Coverage Matrix --- All 32 Elements × 45 Fields
==============================================================
**Legend:**
F = Full (extractable as-is) /
P = Partial (exists, needs expansion) /
S = Stub (heading only, content empty) /
N = N/A
1.1 Group 1--3: Identity, Technical, Sources (fields 1--18)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
*Carried forward from Part A (Phase 2I-2a).*
**Field key:**
1=id, 2=title, 3=name, 4=sum, 5=intro, 6=latex,
7=tctx, 8=tcnt, 9=logic, 10=twhy, 11=tinf,
12=stor, 13=sheb, 14=sgos, 15=sapo, 16=squr, 17=ssan, 18=vsec
::
Elem | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 7 8 9 10 11 | 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
-----+-------------------+---------------+----------------------
ax1_A1 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax2_A2 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax3_A3 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax4_A4 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax5_A5 | P F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax6_A6 | P F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax7_A7 | P F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax8_A8 | P F P F F F | P P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax9_A9 | P F P F F F | P P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax10_A10 | P F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax11_A11 | P F P F F F | F F P P F | F F F F F F F
ax12_A12 | P F P F F F | P P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax13_A13 | P F P F F F | P P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax14_A14 | P F P F F F | F F P P F | F F F F F F F
-----+-------------------+---------------+----------------------
ax15_A15 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax16_A16 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax17_A17 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax18_A18 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax19_A19 | F F P F F F | F F P P F | F F F F F F F
ax20_A20 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax21_A21 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax22_A22 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax23_A23 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax24_A24 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
ax25_A25 | F F P F F F | F P P P F | F F F F F F F
-----+-------------------+---------------+----------------------
th5_T5 | F F P F F P | P P S F F | S S S S S S S
th6_T6 | F F P F F F | P P S F F | S S S S S S S
th7_T7 | F F P F F P | P P S F F | P P P P S S P
th8_T8 | F F P F F F | F F S F F | S S S S S S P
th9_T9 | F F P F F P | P F S F F | S S P P S S P
th10_T10 | F F P F F P | P P S F F | S S S S S S S
th11_T11 | F F P F F P | P P S F F | S S S S S S S
1.2 Group 4: Operational State (fields 19--29)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**Field key:**
19=limit, 20=jj, 21=aa, 22=kk, 23=ff, 24=cc, 25=dd, 26=gg,
27=hh, 28=ww, 29=yy
::
Elem | 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
-----+-----------------------------------
ax1_A1 | P S S P S P S S S P S
ax2_A2 | P S S P S P S S S P S
ax3_A3 | P S S P S P S S S P S
ax4_A4 | P S S P S P S S S P S
ax5_A5 | P S S S S P S S S S S
ax6_A6 | P S S S S P S S S S S
ax7_A7 | P S S S S P S S S S S
ax8_A8 | P S S S S P S S S P S
ax9_A9 | P S S S S P S S S P S
ax10_A10 | P S S S S P S S S S S
ax11_A11 | P S S S S P P S S P S
ax12_A12 | S S S S S P S S S S S
ax13_A13 | S S S S S P S S S S S
ax14_A14 | P S S S S P P S S S S
-----+-----------------------------------
ax15_A15 | P S S P S P S S S P S
ax16_A16 | S S S P S P S S S S S
ax17_A17 | S S S P S P S S S S S
ax18_A18 | P S S S S P P S S S S
ax19_A19 | F P P P S P P S S P P
ax20_A20 | S S S S S P S S S S S
ax21_A21 | S S S S S P S S S S S
ax22_A22 | S S S P S P S S S S S
ax23_A23 | S S S P S P S S S S S
ax24_A24 | P S S P S P P S S S S
ax25_A25 | P P P P S P P S P P P
-----+-----------------------------------
th5_T5 | P P P P S S S S S S P
th6_T6 | S S P P S S S S S S S
th7_T7 | S S P P S S S S S S S
th8_T8 | P P P P S P P P S P P
th9_T9 | P P P P S P S P S S P
th10_T10 | S S P P S S S S S S S
th11_T11 | P S P P S S S S S P S
1.3 Group 5: Network & Versioning (fields 30--40)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**Field key:**
30=needs, 31=feeds, 32=stayc, 33=mento, 34=diff, 35=ll,
36=con, 37=pro, 38=vv, 39=vvnow, 40=model
::
Elem | 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
-----+-----------------------------------
ax1_A1 | P P P S S P P P P P F
ax2_A2 | P P P S S P P P P P F
ax3_A3 | P P P S S P P P P P F
ax4_A4 | P P P S S P P P P P F
ax5_A5 | P P P S S P S S P P F
ax6_A6 | P P P S S P S S P P F
ax7_A7 | P P P S S P S S P P F
ax8_A8 | P P P S S P S S P P F
ax9_A9 | P P P S S P S S P P F
ax10_A10 | P P P S S P S S P P F
ax11_A11 | P P P S S P S S P P F
ax12_A12 | P P P S S P S S P P F
ax13_A13 | P P P S S P S S P P F
ax14_A14 | P P P S S P S S P P F
-----+-----------------------------------
ax15_A15 | P P P S S P F F P P F
ax16_A16 | P P P S S P P P P P F
ax17_A17 | P P P S S P P P P P F
ax18_A18 | P P P S S P S S P P F
ax19_A19 | P P P S S P F F P P F
ax20_A20 | P P P S S P S S P P F
ax21_A21 | P P P S S P S S P P F
ax22_A22 | P P P S S P P P P P F
ax23_A23 | P P P S S P P P P P F
ax24_A24 | P P P S S P P P P P F
ax25_A25 | P P P S S P F F P P F
-----+-----------------------------------
th5_T5 | F P P S S P F F P P F
th6_T6 | F P P S S P P P P P F
th7_T7 | F P P S S P P P P P F
th8_T8 | F P P S S P F F P P F
th9_T9 | F P P S S P F F P P F
th10_T10 | F P P S S P P P P P F
th11_T11 | F P P S S P P P P P F
1.4 Group 6: Analytical (fields 41--45)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**Field key:**
41=conv, 42=bib, 43=pol, 44=his, 45=doi
::
Elem | 41 42 43 44 45
-----+----------------
ax1_A1 | P P S P S
ax2_A2 | P P S P S
ax3_A3 | P P S S S
ax4_A4 | P P S S S
ax5_A5 | P P S S S
ax6_A6 | P P S S S
ax7_A7 | P P S S S
ax8_A8 | P P S S S
ax9_A9 | P P S S S
ax10_A10 | P P S S S
ax11_A11 | P P S P S
ax12_A12 | P P S S S
ax13_A13 | P P S S S
ax14_A14 | P P S P S
-----+----------------
ax15_A15 | P P S S S
ax16_A16 | P P S S S
ax17_A17 | P P S S S
ax18_A18 | P P S S S
ax19_A19 | P P S S S
ax20_A20 | P P S S S
ax21_A21 | P P S S S
ax22_A22 | P P S S S
ax23_A23 | P P S S S
ax24_A24 | P P S S S
ax25_A25 | P P P P S
-----+----------------
th5_T5 | S S S S S
th6_T6 | S S S S S
th7_T7 | S P S S S
th8_T8 | S P P P S
th9_T9 | S P S S S
th10_T10 | S S S S S
th11_T11 | S S S S S
1.5 Summary Statistics --- All 45 Fields
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
::
Field F P S N %Full Group
------ --- --- --- --- ----- -----
1 id 22 10 0 0 69% Identity
2 title 32 0 0 0 100% Identity
3 name 0 32 0 0 0% Identity
4 sum 32 0 0 0 100% Identity
5 intro 32 0 0 0 100% Identity
6 latex 27 5 0 0 84% Identity
7 tctx 22 10 0 0 69% Technical
8 tcnt 5 27 0 0 16% Technical
9 logic 0 25 7 0 0% Technical
10 twhy 7 25 0 0 22% Technical
11 tinf 32 0 0 0 100% Technical
12 stor 25 1 6 0 78% Sources
13 sheb 25 1 6 0 78% Sources
14 sgos 25 2 5 0 78% Sources
15 sapo 25 2 5 0 78% Sources
16 squr 25 0 7 0 78% Sources
17 ssan 25 0 7 0 78% Sources
18 vsec 25 3 4 0 78% Sources
---
19 limit 1 23 8 0 3% Operational
20 jj 0 4 28 0 0% Operational
21 aa 0 9 23 0 0% Operational
22 kk 0 18 14 0 0% Operational
23 ff 0 0 32 0 0% Operational
24 cc 0 27 5 0 0% Operational
25 dd 0 8 24 0 0% Operational
26 gg 0 2 30 0 0% Operational
27 hh 0 1 31 0 0% Operational
28 ww 0 11 21 0 0% Operational
29 yy 0 5 27 0 0% Operational
30 needs 7 25 0 0 22% Network
31 feeds 0 32 0 0 0% Network
32 stayc 0 32 0 0 0% Network
33 mento 0 0 32 0 0% Network
34 diff 0 0 32 0 0% Network
35 ll 0 32 0 0 0% Network
36 con 7 13 12 0 22% Network
37 pro 7 13 12 0 22% Network
38 vv 0 32 0 0 0% Network
39 vvnow 0 32 0 0 0% Network
40 model 32 0 0 0 100% Network
41 conv 0 25 7 0 0% Analytical
42 bib 0 28 4 0 0% Analytical
43 pol 0 2 30 0 0% Analytical
44 his 0 6 26 0 0% Analytical
45 doi 0 0 32 0 0% Analytical
**Aggregate by group:**
::
Group Avg %Full Avg %Partial Avg %Stub
---------------------- --------- ----------- ---------
1-3: Identity+Tech+Src 65% 28% 7%
4: Operational 0% 25% 75%
5: Network & Version 15% 53% 32%
6: Analytical 0% 38% 62%
-------------------------------------------------------
OVERALL (45 fields) 26% 35% 39%
----
2. Network Dependency Graph
==============================
2.1 Theorem Dependencies (from "Given..." proof lists)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.. list-table::
:header-rows: 1
:widths: 8 30 62
* - Theorem
- Depends on (needs)
- Justification
* - th5_T5
- ax8_A8, ax9_A9, ax11_A11, ax15_A15, ax16_A16, ax17_A17, ax18_A18
- Divine presence (ax8_A8) + sustaining (ax9_A9) + dipolarity (ax11_A11) establish
the ontological context; agency (ax15_A15) + delegation (ax16_A16) + guiding
(ax17_A17) + moral responsibility (ax18_A18) construct the exoneration chain
* - th6_T6
- ax19_A19
- Causal concentration (ax19_A19) directly provides the unique h* whose
influence th6_T6 quantifies
* - th7_T7
- th6_T6, ax16_A16, ax17_A17, ax22_A22
- th6_T6 identifies h*; delegation (ax16_A16) + guiding (ax17_A17) show God seeks
rather than forces; creative work (ax22_A22) requires the volunteer to
act freely
* - th8_T8
- ax20_A20, ax21_A21, ax24_A24
- Innovation failure (ax20_A20) + success (ax21_A21) establish the two
trajectories; life-trifecta (ax24_A24) defines the attractor criterion
* - th9_T9
- ax15_A15, ax25_A25
- Agency (ax15_A15) provides the Markov chain agents; Jubilee
recalibration (ax25_A25) ensures irreducibility (no role becomes
absorbing)
* - th10_T10
- ax8_A8, ax9_A9, ax11_A11, ax15_A15
- Presence (ax8_A8) + sustaining (ax9_A9) establish omnipotence; dipolarity
(ax11_A11) + agency (ax15_A15) show how omnipotence coexists with genuine
creaturely freedom
* - th11_T11
- ax15_A15, ax25_A25, th8_T8
- Agency (ax15_A15) provides stakes; Jubilee recalibration (ax25_A25) provides
windows; th8_T8's binary attractors provide the irreversibility
structure that makes stakes real without requiring biological death
2.2 Inter-Axiom Dependencies
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
::
ax1_A1 ← (foundational: mereological containment)
ax2_A2 ← ax1_A1 (proper parthood extends containment)
ax3_A3 ← ax2_A2 (divine surplus strengthens proper parthood)
ax4_A4 ← ax1_A1, ax3_A3 (omnipresent divine surplus)
ax5_A5 ← ax1_A1 (necessary existence of G)
ax6_A6 ← ax1_A1 (contingent existence of W)
ax7_A7 ← ax1_A1 (necessary containment — modalizes ax1_A1)
ax8_A8 ← ax1_A1 (intimate divine presence to all parts)
ax9_A9 ← ax8_A8 (world sustained by divine presence)
ax10_A10 ← ax9_A9 (God not sustained by world — asymmetry)
ax11_A11 ← ax1_A1, ax2_A2, ax3_A3 (dipolar composition presupposes containment + surplus)
ax12_A12 ← ax11_A11 (language about divine nature requires dipolarity)
ax13_A13 ← ax12_A12 (consistency of divine assertions)
ax14_A14 ← ax1_A1-ax13_A13 (revelation consistency across all prior axioms)
---
ax15_A15 ← PET foundation (agency within divine ontological structure)
ax16_A16 ← ax15_A15 (delegation presupposes genuine agency)
ax17_A17 ← ax15_A15, ax16_A16 (guiding-not-forcing requires agency + delegation)
ax18_A18 ← ax15_A15, ax17_A17 (moral responsibility requires agency + freedom from force)
ax19_A19 ← ax15_A15 (causal concentration presupposes agency)
ax20_A20 ← ax15_A15 (innovation failure presupposes agency)
ax21_A21 ← ax20_A20 (innovation success is the complement of ax20_A20)
ax22_A22 ← ax15_A15, ax17_A17 (creative work requires agency + freedom from force)
ax23_A23 ← ax22_A22 (innovation voluntariness extends creative-work requirement)
ax24_A24 ← ax20_A20, ax21_A21 (life-trifecta definition uses both outcomes)
ax25_A25 ← ax24_A24 (recalibration addresses life-trifecta maintenance)
2.3 Logical Chain (from Stress-Test 2G-1)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The core argument flows through three links:
::
ax24_A24 → th8_T8 (S: semi-formal — CTMC backbone, informal mapping step)
→ ax25_A25 (L: plausible — weakest link; "some mechanism" ≠ "periodic reset")
→ ResearchCity (L: plausible — competitive-inhibitor model, no rate parameters)
**Key downstream dependencies of th8_T8:**
- th9_T9 depends on ax25_A25, which depends on th8_T8 for its justification
- th11_T11 depends on th8_T8 directly (binary attractors provide irreversibility)
- If th8_T8 falls from "semi-formal" to "asserted," the practical
conclusion chain loses its mathematical backbone
2.4 Uncertain or Disputed Edges
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.. list-table::
:header-rows: 1
:widths: 25 75
* - Edge
- Why uncertain
* - th8_T8 ← ax24_A24 (mapping step)
- The absorbing CTMC theorem is valid; the mapping from
"civilization" to "absorbing CTMC with cord violations as
transition triggers" is the critical informal step (2G-1)
* - ax25_A25 ← th8_T8 (mechanism specificity)
- th8_T8 establishes "some anti-concentration mechanism needed" but
NOT "periodic Jubilee-based recalibration specifically" (2G-1
Gap 1, weakest link)
* - th9_T9 ← 7TrackRole model
- The Markov chain convergence theorem requires a fully specified
chain; 7TrackRole lacks operational definitions and transition
probabilities (2G-1 Gap 3, Grade A)
* - ResearchCity ← ax25_A25
- The competitive-inhibitor model has no specified rate parameters
for the geopolitical pathway (2G-1 Link 3)
2.5 Isolated or Under-Connected Elements
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.. list-table::
:header-rows: 1
:widths: 12 88
* - Element
- Finding
* - ax12_A12, ax13_A13
- No theorem cites ax12_A12 or ax13_A13 in its proof. These axioms constrain
*language* about divinity (ax12_A12) and *consistency* of divine
assertions (ax13_A13) but have no formal downstream consumers. This
is structurally acceptable --- they serve as meta-constraints on
the system rather than proof ingredients --- but the isolation
should be explicitly acknowledged in their PoR entries.
* - ax14_A14
- No theorem cites ax14_A14. Like ax12_A12--ax13_A13, it is a meta-constraint
(revelation consistency). Its ``feeds`` field should document its
role as a system-wide consistency check rather than a proof
ingredient.
* - th10_T10
- No other theorem or axiom depends on th10_T10. It is a standalone
reconciliation result (omnipotence + freedom). This is not a
gap --- th10_T10 addresses a specific philosophical question --- but
its network isolation should be noted.
* - ax5_A5--ax7_A7
- These modal axioms (necessary existence, contingent world,
necessary containment) are not directly cited in any JUB
theorem proof. They operate at the PET level. Their ``feeds``
should document their role in the mereological-modal foundation
that the JUB theorems presuppose.
----
3. Combined Gap Analysis
==========================
3.1 Critical Gaps (>50% Stub across all 32 elements)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.. list-table::
:header-rows: 1
:widths: 8 12 10 70
* - #
- Field
- %Stub
- Assessment
* - 23
- ``ff``
- 100%
- **Systemically empty.** No formal FeedbackFlow queues exist for
any element. The quest con/pro structure IS processed feedback,
but unprocessed feedback channels do not exist per-element.
* - 33
- ``mento``
- 100%
- **Systemically empty.** No element has "study after ax1_A1--ax4_A4"
style learning guidance. The Formal Framework section provides
partial ordering context but not per-element guidance.
* - 34
- ``diff``
- 100%
- **Systemically empty.** No per-element version history exists.
OOv1 |rarr| OOv2 changes are documented in session llogs but
not collected as per-element diff records.
* - 45
- ``doi``
- 100%
- **Systemically empty.** No DOIs or permanent identifiers have
been assigned. This is expected at the current development stage.
* - 43
- ``pol``
- 94%
- Only ax25_A25 and th8_T8 have identifiable policy content. Most elements
are not policy-relevant.
* - 26
- ``gg``
- 94%
- Only th8_T8 (CTMC model) and th9_T9 (7TrackRole framework) have
identifiable "promising draft" content.
* - 27
- ``hh``
- 97%
- Only ax25_A25 has deprecated content (GC analogy partial withdrawal).
* - 20
- ``jj``
- 88%
- Only ax19_A19, ax25_A25, th5_T5, th8_T8, th9_T9 have identified blockers (from stress-
test convergence matrix and Phase 3 priorities).
* - 29
- ``yy``
- 84%
- Only elements with stress-test coverage have identifiable test
cases.
* - 44
- ``his``
- 81%
- Only ax1_A1--ax2_A2, ax11_A11, ax14_A14, ax25_A25, th8_T8 have historical analysis content.
* - 9
- ``logic``
- 22%
- 7/32 elements are Stub (all theorems th5_T5--th11_T11). No element is
Full. This is the largest cross-cutting gap in fields 1--18.
* - 21
- ``aa``
- 72%
- Only elements with Phase 3 priorities have identifiable next
steps.
* - 25
- ``dd``
- 75%
- Only 8 elements have identifiable architectural decisions.
* - 28
- ``ww``
- 66%
- Only elements in the core logical chain have identified
downstream breakage risks.
**Pattern:** POST operational fields (20--29) are systemically empty.
The stress-test outputs contain the raw material for many of these
fields but the content has not been structured per-element. The
analytical fields (41--45) are similarly sparse for theorems.
3.2 Quick Wins (Partial → Full with targeted work)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.. list-table::
:header-rows: 1
:widths: 8 12 50 30
* - #
- Field
- Why quick
- Effort
* - 3
- ``name``
- CamelCase conversion from titles is mechanical: "Containment"
|rarr| ``Containment``, "Human Genuine Agency" |rarr|
``HumanGenuineAgency``
- Script: ~1 hour
* - 1
- ``id``
- 10 PET axioms (ax5_A5--ax14_A14) need ``.. _pet-ax{N}:`` labels added
following the AHA convention
- Script: ~30 min
* - 6
- ``latex``
- 5 theorems (th5_T5, th7_T7, th9_T9--th11_T11) need inline ``:math:`` extracted
to standalone ``.. math::`` blocks
- Manual: ~2 hours
* - 40
- ``model``
- Already 100% Full. No action needed.
- None
* - 30
- ``needs``
- Theorems already F (explicit "Given..." lists). Axioms need
dependency lists generated from the graph in Section 2.
- Synthesize: ~3 hours
* - 31
- ``feeds``
- Mechanical inversion of field 30 once ``needs`` is populated
- Script: ~1 hour
* - 36/37
- ``con/pro``
- Quest label mapping exists (quest.rst lines 7--32). Needs
per-element cross-reference lists generated.
- Script: ~2 hours
* - 38/39
- ``vv/vvnow``
- OOv2 VVN is assigned at framework level. Per-element VVNs
need mechanical generation.
- Script: ~1 hour
* - 32
- ``stayc``
- Framework-level QQ exists. Per-element codes need assignment
based on stress-test assessments.
- Synthesize: ~4 hours
3.3 Source-Text Gaps by Tradition (from Part A)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**Axioms (ax1_A1--ax25_A25):** 100% Full across all 7 traditions. Every axiom
has structured "Scriptural and philosophical support:" sections with
specific chapter:verse citations.
**Theorems (th5_T5--th11_T11):** 43 of 49 cells are Stub. This is the dominant
gap in fields 12--18.
**Priority ranking for filling:**
1. Theorems th5_T5--th11_T11 source-text support (43 S-rated cells). Synthesize
from constituent axiom citations.
2. Quran for theorems: zero coverage, high scholarly importance.
3. Torah and Hebrew Bible for theorems: Jubilee-based framework anchor.
4. Logic field (9) for all elements: largest cross-cutting gap.
3.4 Network Completeness
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**Coverage:** The dependency graph in Section 2 covers all 32 elements.
Every element has at least one edge (either as source or target).
**Completeness findings:**
- **Theorem dependencies are explicit and complete.** Every theorem's
"Given..." list in ``theorems.rst`` is the authoritative source.
- **Axiom dependencies are implicit.** Inter-axiom dependencies are
described in Explanation paragraphs but not formally listed. These
need formalization for the ``needs``/``feeds`` fields.
- **4 elements are under-connected:** ax12_A12, ax13_A13, ax14_A14 (meta-constraints
with no theorem consumers) and th10_T10 (standalone reconciliation). This
is structurally acceptable but should be documented.
- **3 disputed edges** require resolution: th8_T8 mapping step,
ax25_A25 mechanism specificity, and th9_T9 7TrackRole model. All three are
identified as Phase 3 priorities.
3.5 StayVS Coverage
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**Framework-level:** QQ (QualityQuest --- Contested) assigned by Claude
in 2G-2H summary. LLoL's VVN ``iv_LLoL_OOv2r0p0_2026m03d22`` marks a
development milestone, not a maturity claim.
**Per-element:** The 2G-2H summary states: "No item advances to RR in
Claude's assessment." Per-element StayVS codes have not been assigned.
The ``stayc`` field is Partial (P) for all 32 elements --- the
framework-level assessment exists but element-specific codes do not.
**Coverage gap:** A per-element StayVS assessment would require
evaluating each element against the stress-test findings. Elements
with no identified gaps (e.g., ax1_A1--ax4_A4 mereological axioms, which
survived C10's challenge) might warrant higher maturity codes than
elements with open Phase 3 gaps (e.g., th8_T8, th9_T9, ax25_A25).
3.6 Operational Field Patterns
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**Systemic finding:** POST fields (20--29) are 75% Stub on average.
The stress-test outputs contain raw material for many operational
fields, but this material has not been structured per-element:
- **jj (blockers):** The convergence matrix and Phase 3 priorities
identify blockers for 4 elements (th8_T8, th9_T9, ax19_A19, ax25_A25). The remaining
28 elements have no identified blockers.
- **aa (next steps):** Phase 3 priorities map to ~9 elements. The
remaining 23 have no explicit action items.
- **kk (traps):** Con entries identify traps for 18 elements
(those targeted by at least one critique). The remaining 14 have no
identified traps.
- **cc (background reading):** Scriptural citations serve as
background reading for all 25 axioms. Theorems lack external
references except th8_T8 and th9_T9.
- **ff (feedback):** Systemically empty. All 33 critiques have been
processed into the quest; no unprocessed feedback queues exist.
- **ww (breakage risk):** The dependency graph identifies breakage
risks for ~11 elements in the core logical chain. Peripheral elements
have no identified downstream dependents.
**Recommendation:** A Phase 3 "operational field population" pass
should extract stress-test and critique content into the POST fields
for the ~10 most critical elements (those with Phase 3 priorities).
Populating all 32 elements × 11 POST fields would be low-value work
for peripheral elements.
----
4. Complete Extraction Difficulty Table --- All 45 Fields
==========================================================
.. list-table::
:header-rows: 1
:widths: 4 8 10 28 50
* - #
- Field
- Difficulty
- Source location
- Notes
* - 1
- ``id``
- Auto/Parse
- RST ``.. _label:`` markers
- Auto for 22 elements with labels. Parse for ax5_A5--ax14_A14: apply AHA
naming ``pet-ax{N}``.
* - 2
- ``title``
- Auto
- RST section headers
- Direct extraction. Strip ``A{N} ---`` prefix for raw title.
* - 3
- ``name``
- Parse
- Derived from field 2
- Mechanical CamelCase conversion. E.g., "Sustaining Dependence"
|rarr| ``SustainingDependence``.
* - 4
- ``sum``
- Auto
- Italic one-liners below headers
- Regex: first ``*...*`` block after each element's header.
* - 5
- ``intro``
- Auto
- "In plain English:" paragraphs
- Regex: text between ``**In plain English:**`` and next section.
* - 6
- ``latex``
- Auto/Parse
- ``.. math::`` blocks, ``:math:`` roles
- Auto for axioms + th6_T6, th8_T8. Parse for th5_T5, th7_T7, th9_T9--th11_T11 (extract
inline math from "Given..." wrappers).
* - 7
- ``tctx``
- Auto/Parse
- "Explanation:" (axioms), "Significance:" (theorems)
- Auto for 22 F-rated. Parse for 10 P-rated: extract technical
content from merged paragraphs.
* - 8
- ``tcnt``
- Synthesize
- Multiple sections per element
- Requires assembly from Explanation + notes + design features.
P-rated need expansion.
* - 9
- ``logic``
- Synthesize/Generate
- Formal Framework (PET), formal statements
- Synthesize for PET. Generate for JUB and theorems: requires
naming logic system and predicate analysis.
* - 10
- ``twhy``
- Auto/Generate
- "Proof:" (theorems), "Explanation:" (axioms)
- Auto for theorems. Generate for axioms: create justification
chains explaining why each axiom is needed.
* - 11
- ``tinf``
- Auto
- "In plain English:" paragraphs
- Direct extraction. Same source as field 5.
* - 12
- ``stor``
- Auto/Generate
- "**Torah:**" bullets
- Auto for axioms. Generate for theorems: synthesize from
constituent axiom Torah references.
* - 13
- ``sheb``
- Auto/Generate
- "**Prophets & Writings:**" bullets
- Same pattern as stor.
* - 14
- ``sgos``
- Auto/Generate
- "**Gospel (Jesus):**" bullets
- Same pattern.
* - 15
- ``sapo``
- Auto/Generate
- "**Christian (wider):**" bullets
- Same pattern. AHA splits sgos/sapo; PoR splits
Gospel/Christian --- may need re-sorting.
* - 16
- ``squr``
- Parse/Generate
- "**Islamic:**" bullets
- Parse for axioms: separate Quran citations from broader Islamic
theology. Generate for theorems.
* - 17
- ``ssan``
- Parse/Generate
- "**Hindu:**" bullets
- Parse for axioms: separate Sanskrit citations from broader Hindu
theology. Generate for theorems.
* - 18
- ``vsec``
- Auto/Generate
- "**Secular:**" bullets
- Auto for axioms. Generate for theorems where no secular content
exists. th8_T8, th9_T9 have partial content.
* - 19
- ``limit``
- Parse/Generate
- Explanation paragraphs, stress-test reports
- Parse for ax19_A19 (dedicated section). Synthesize for elements with
stress-test limitation analysis. Generate for elements with no
limitation content.
* - 20
- ``jj``
- Synthesize
- Convergence matrix, Phase 3 priorities
- Extract from 2G-4 convergence matrix and Phase 3 priority list.
Map each gap/priority to its element. Generate for 28 elements
with no identified blocker (most will be "none identified").
* - 21
- ``aa``
- Synthesize
- Phase 3 priorities, stress-test recommendations
- Map Phase 3 priorities to elements. Generate for 23 elements
with no explicit action items.
* - 22
- ``kk``
- Synthesize
- Con entries, stress-test warnings
- Extract trap descriptions from con entries. Synthesize avoidance
strategies from pro entries. Generate for 14 untargeted elements.
* - 23
- ``ff``
- Generate
- (none --- field is empty)
- Would require creating FeedbackFlow mailto links or feedback
channels per element. Low priority.
* - 24
- ``cc``
- Parse
- Scriptural citations (axioms), empirical refs (th8_T8, th9_T9)
- Parse tradition bullets for axioms. Extract academic citations
from stress-tests for theorems.
* - 25
- ``dd``
- Synthesize
- Explanation notes, design features, ax11b_A11b fork
- Synthesize from existing architectural discussion for 8 elements.
Generate for 24 elements with no decisions documented.
* - 26
- ``gg``
- Synthesize
- Stress-test formalization roadmaps
- Extract from 2G-1 "to close" recommendations for th8_T8 (CTMC
formalization) and th9_T9 (7TrackRole specification).
* - 27
- ``hh``
- Parse
- Quest dispositions (conceded/withdrawn)
- Extract from ax25_A25-related concessions (GC analogy, C2.10
equivocation). Most elements: N/A.
* - 28
- ``ww``
- Synthesize
- Dependency graph (Section 2)
- Derive from ``feeds`` field: list what downstream elements break
if this element changes. Mechanical once graph is populated.
* - 29
- ``yy``
- Synthesize
- Stress-test grading tables
- Extract test cases from 2G-1 resolution grades, 2G-2 credibility
assessments, and 2G-3 disposition audit entries.
* - 30
- ``needs``
- Auto/Synthesize
- "Given..." lists (theorems), Explanation (axioms)
- Auto for theorems (extract from proof headers). Synthesize for
axioms from explanation content and the graph in Section 2.
* - 31
- ``feeds``
- Synthesize
- Inverse of field 30
- Mechanical inversion once ``needs`` is populated. Script.
* - 32
- ``stayc``
- Synthesize
- 2G-2H maturity assessment, stress-test outcomes
- Assign per-element codes from framework QQ + stress-test
findings. Elements with open Phase 3 gaps stay at QQ or below;
elements with resolved challenges may warrant higher codes.
* - 33
- ``mento``
- Generate
- (none --- field is empty)
- Requires new content: learning pathways, prerequisite chains,
recommended study order. Could be partially derived from the
dependency graph (Section 2).
* - 34
- ``diff``
- Generate
- Session llogs (2a--2H)
- Requires collecting per-element changes from all Phase 2 session
llogs. Labor-intensive but possible with grep across llogs.
* - 35
- ``ll``
- Synthesize
- Session llog metadata, file-modification tables
- Cross-reference element mentions in llog titles and file-change
tables. Mechanical but requires reading all llog metadata.
* - 36
- ``con``
- Parse
- Quest.rst con entries + label mapping
- Quest label mapping (lines 7--32) provides the mapping. Parse
con entries to identify which elements each targets.
* - 37
- ``pro``
- Parse
- Quest.rst pro entries + label mapping
- Same as field 36.
* - 38
- ``vv``
- Generate
- OOv2 freeze VVN
- Generate per-element VVNs following the pattern
``iv_LLoL_OOv2r0p0_2026m03d22`` at framework level. Per-element
VVNs may share the framework VVN until independent versioning.
* - 39
- ``vvnow``
- Generate
- Derived from field 38
- Pointer to current version. Mechanical once ``vv`` is populated.
* - 40
- ``model``
- Auto
- File location (pet/ vs jub/)
- Trivially derivable: ax1_A1--ax14_A14 = Pet, ax15_A15--ax25_A25 = Jub, th5_T5--th11_T11 = Jub.
* - 41
- ``conv``
- Synthesize
- Tradition support sections (axioms), quest C2.10 concession
- Synthesize convergence/divergence patterns from the 7-tradition
support sections. For ax25_A25 specifically: incorporate C2.10
concession (only Torah supports periodic-reset mechanism).
Generate for theorems.
* - 42
- ``bib``
- Parse/Synthesize
- Tradition bullets, stress-test citations
- Parse academic citations from axiom tradition bullets (Piketty,
SDT, Scheidel, etc.) and stress-test reports. Collect into
per-element bibliography.
* - 43
- ``pol``
- Generate
- Stress-test feasibility analysis
- Generate policy discussion content for ax25_A25 (inequality/
redistribution policy) and th8_T8 (existential risk policy). Most
elements have no policy relevance.
* - 44
- ``his``
- Synthesize/Generate
- Axiom explanations, stress-test historical analysis
- Synthesize for ax11_A11 (panentheism since Krause 1828), ax14_A14
(revelation testing history), ax25_A25 (Jubilee history, Fager 1993),
th8_T8 (civilizational collapse). Generate for others.
* - 45
- ``doi``
- Generate
- (none --- field is empty)
- Requires ResearchCity DOI-equivalent system. Not actionable at
current stage.
4.1 Difficulty Summary
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
::
Difficulty Count Fields
----------- ------ ------
Auto 6 title, sum, intro, tinf, model, (partial: id, latex, tctx, needs, stor-vsec for axioms)
Parse 7 name, squr, ssan, limit, con, pro, bib (plus partial for others)
Synthesize 14 tcnt, logic, jj, aa, kk, cc, dd, gg, ww, yy, needs(axioms), feeds, stayc, conv, his
Generate 10 ff, mento, diff, vv, vvnow, doi, pol, hh, ll (partial), 34
Mixed 8 Most fields have different difficulty for axioms vs. theorems
**Key insight from Part A (confirmed in Part B):** Fields 1--18 are
60% Auto/Parse for axioms. Fields 19--45 are 75% Synthesize/Generate.
The axiom corpus is extraction-ready; the operational and analytical
infrastructure needs to be built from stress-test outputs.
----
5. Recommendations for Phase 3 Priority Ordering
====================================================
5.1 Field Population Priorities
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Ordered by impact-per-hour:
1. **Quick-win script fields** (fields 1, 3, 31, 38, 39, 40) ---
mechanical operations that bring 6 fields to 100% Full. ~4 hours
total.
2. **Network fields** (30, 31, 36, 37) --- the dependency graph in
Section 2 is complete. Converting it to per-element ``needs``/
``feeds`` lists is mechanical synthesis. Con/pro cross-references
are mapped in quest.rst. ~6 hours total.
3. **Logic field** (9) --- the largest cross-cutting gap. Requires
naming the logic system for each element and analyzing what each
predicate preserves/discards. This aligns with Phase 3 Priority 6
(formal semantics for th5_T5--th11_T11). ~20 hours.
4. **Theorem source-text support** (12--18) --- 43 Stub cells.
Synthesize from constituent axiom citations. Aligns with Phase 3
Priority 9 (cross-traditional support audit). ~15 hours.
5. **Operational fields for critical elements** (19--29 for th8_T8, th9_T9,
ax19_A19, ax25_A25, th5_T5) --- populate jj, aa, kk, dd, ww, yy from stress-test
outputs for the 5 most critical elements. ~8 hours.
6. **StayVS per-element codes** (32) --- assign maturity codes based on
stress-test assessments. ~4 hours.
7. **Convergence analysis** (41) --- synthesize from tradition support
sections. Most valuable for ax25_A25 (C2.10 concession implications).
~10 hours.
5.2 Fields to Deprioritize
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- **ff (23):** FeedbackFlow queues are infrastructure, not content.
Build when the compilation skill creates per-element pages.
- **doi (45):** Requires ResearchCity DOI-equivalent system.
Not actionable.
- **mento (33):** Learning guidance is a PoT/PoU concern, not a PoR
concern. Defer to the compilation skill's ``easy`` depth pass.
- **diff (34):** Per-element version history is useful but
labor-intensive. Defer to a future automated changelog.
- **gg (26), hh (27):** Growth garden and history heap are lifecycle
management fields. Populate organically as content evolves.
----
6. Proposed Changes to the 45-Field Structure
================================================
6.1 No structural changes recommended
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The 45-field structure as defined in the AHA design document is
well-designed. The field definitions are clear, non-overlapping, and
comprehensive. The low coverage of fields 19--45 reflects the project's
developmental stage (Phase 2 focused on critique integration, not PoR
compilation), not a design flaw.
6.2 Observations for Phase 3 consideration
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1. **Fields 5 (intro) and 11 (tinf) draw from the same source** ("In
plain English:" paragraphs). The AHA may want to explicitly define
the extraction boundary: intro = first paragraph (accessible
overview), tinf = analogies and metaphors within the explanation.
2. **Field 24 (cc) overlaps with field 42 (bib).** ``cc``
(CollectedContent) is operational ("background reading from others")
while ``bib`` (Bibliography) is analytical ("academic references").
In practice, the same citations appear in both. Consider whether
``cc`` should be restricted to *unprocessed* reading (like ``ff``
for feedback) while ``bib`` holds *curated* references.
3. **The ``conv`` field (41) could absorb tradition source-text
analysis** from fields 12--18, presenting a unified convergence
picture. Currently, ``stor`` through ``vsec`` provide raw citations
while ``conv`` synthesizes agreement/divergence. This split is
architecturally sound but may lead to redundant analysis. The
compilation skill should ensure ``conv`` references the ``s*``
fields rather than duplicating them.
4. **POST field population should be event-driven**, not batch-
populated. Fields like ``jj`` (blockers), ``aa`` (next steps), and
``kk`` (traps) change with each development cycle. Pre-populating
them from Phase 2 stress-tests creates a snapshot that will
immediately begin aging. Consider treating these as living fields
updated at each phase boundary rather than compiled once.
.. admonition:: TELES migration report (2026m04d04)
Mechanical identifier migration applied to this file.
All axiom/theorem text references were migrated from short form
(e.g., A15) to compound form (e.g., ax15_A15) as part of the
matheology compound naming operation. Both forms refer to the
same formal object. The old form survives as the suffix to
ensure consistency with the oldest records; the new form adds
a temporary-status prefix. Forward-facing pages use brief form
(ax15) only. See
:ref:`hell-ll-other-b15-teles-renaming-prompt` for the complete
mapping table and :ref:`legacy-5d-link-names-table-for-pet-jub-model` for the permanent
reference.
.. admonition:: TELES repair --- 2026m04d04
Repaired RST section title errors by wrapping verbatim prompt content containing
heading syntax in ``.. code-block:: rst`` blocks. No formal content was modified.