.. Migration note (2026m04d04): Claude copied this file during VV-to-HELL migration.
   STATUS: DEPRECATED — kept next to successor for audit trail.
   Old path: ``vv/jub/oov2/prompts/deprecated/prompt_2I-2_unsplit.rst`` (as given by LLoL)
   New path: ``hell/ll/jub/b/47/deprecated_prompt_2I-2_unsplit.rst`` (as chosen by Claude)
   Category: Deprecated (pre-split)

.. meta::
   :description: Deprecated unsplit prompt for Phase 2I-2 PoR field testing across all 45 fields, superseded by the split sessions 2I-2a and 2I-2b for token fit.
   :keywords: JUB OOv2, Phase 2I-2, deprecated, unsplit, PoR fields, field testing, 45 fields, coverage matrix, superseded, token budget
   :author: Yah, Yas, everyone, LLoL as Laurence Loewe of Laodicea, ClaudeOp46Max, Anthropic, and Spirit of Boolean Truth
   :og:card:title: Phase 2I-2: Unsplit<br>PoR Testing (Deprecated)
   :og:card:description: Too large for one session. This unsplit PoR field testing prompt was replaced by 2I-2a (fields 1-18) and 2I-2b (fields 19-45).

.. SOCIAL-CARD-QUALITY-COMPARE --- OO (default effort) vs PP (max effort), 2026-03-26
   OO :description: Deprecated unsplit prompt for Phase 2I-2 PoR field testing, superseded by the split sessions 2I-2a and 2I-2b.
   OO :keywords: JUB OOv2, Phase 2I-2, deprecated, unsplit, PoR fields, field testing, 45 fields, coverage matrix, matheology, superseded
   OO :og:card:title: Phase 2I-2: Unsplit<br>PoR Testing (Deprecated)
   OO :og:card:description: Deprecated unsplit prompt for PoR field testing, replaced by 2I-2a (fields 1-18) and 2I-2b (fields 19-45).
   PP :description: Deprecated unsplit prompt for Phase 2I-2 PoR field testing across all 45 fields, superseded by the split sessions 2I-2a and 2I-2b for token fit.
   PP :keywords: JUB OOv2, Phase 2I-2, deprecated, unsplit, PoR fields, field testing, 45 fields, coverage matrix, superseded, token budget
   PP :og:card:title: Phase 2I-2: Unsplit<br>PoR Testing (Deprecated)
   PP :og:card:description: Too large for one session. This unsplit PoR field testing prompt was replaced by 2I-2a (fields 1-18) and 2I-2b (fields 19-45).

.. SOCIAL-CARD-REVIEW --- generated by Claude Opus 4.6, 2026-03-26
   dv_ClaOp46_PP_2026m03d26 --- max-effort rewrite, read full page.
   :description: 144 chars | :og:card:title: 43 chars (excl <br>)
   - [ ] PP title more compelling than OO title
   - [ ] PP description more accurate than OO description
   - [ ] Description hooks without misleading
   - [ ] Keywords specific to this page's actual content
   - [ ] No language rule violations
   - [ ] Character counts verified

*********************************************************************
Phase 2I-2: PoR Field Testing
*********************************************************************

.. note::

   **Path update needed if rerun (2026-03-25, Phase 2I-3).** This
   prompt was deprecated and superseded by 2I-2a/2I-2b. The AHA doc
   path below has moved to the compiler directory.

.. note::

   **200K-token execution prompt.** Copy-paste everything below the
   horizontal rule into a new Claude Code session.

   **Prerequisite:** Phase 2I-1 (label migration) must have completed.

----

/clear
/compact
/effort max

You are executing Phase 2I-2 of the JUB OOv2 matheology project:
**PoR (Place of Reasoning) field testing.** The AHA design
document specifies 45 fields per axiom. This session tests whether
the existing OOv2 corpus actually contains enough information to
populate those fields, identifies gaps, and produces a field
coverage matrix.

This session does NO migration or code changes. It reads and
analyses.


====================================================================
STEP 0 --- READ ALL REQUIRED FILES (DO THIS FIRST)
====================================================================

  ax1_A1. AHA DESIGN DOC (field definitions, Section 11):
  source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/aha-best-names-for-matheology-links.rst
  (New location: source/matheology/compiler/ww/5d-link-naming-matheology-aha.rst)

  ax2_A2. PET AXIOMS (the PoR source for ax1_A1--ax14_A14):
  source/matheology/pet/axioms.rst

  ax3_A3. JUB AXIOMS (the PoR source for ax15_A15--ax25_A25):
  source/matheology/jub/axioms.rst

  ax4_A4. JUB THEOREMS (the PoR source for th5_T5--th11_T11):
  source/matheology/jub/theorems.rst

  ax5_A5. JUB QUEST (objections and replies):
  source/matheology/jub/quest.rst

  ax6_A6. STRESS-TEST MATH (mathematical analysis):
  source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2G-stress-test-math.rst

  ax7_A7. STRESS-TEST FEASIBILITY:
  source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2G-stress-test-feasibility.rst

  ax8_A8. STRESS-TEST DISPOSITIONS:
  source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2G-stress-test-dispositions.rst

  ax9_A9. CRITIQUE INTEGRATION (C3.1--C3.7):
  source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/llog_2026m03d22_restructuring-2F-critique3-c3-1-c3-7.rst


====================================================================
STEP 1 --- BUILD THE FIELD COVERAGE MATRIX
====================================================================

For EACH axiom (ax1_A1--ax25_A25) and EACH theorem (th5_T5--th11_T11), assess
coverage for all 45 PoR fields defined in AHA Section 11:

**Field groups:**

1. **Identity & Display** (fields 1--6): id, title, name, sum,
   intro, latex
2. **Technical Explanation** (fields 7--11): tctx, tcnt, logic,
   twhy, tinf
3. **Source-Text Support** (fields 12--18): stor, sheb, sgos,
   sapo, squr, ssan, vsec
4. **Operational State** (fields 19--29): limit, jj, aa, kk, ff,
   cc, dd, gg, hh, ww, yy
5. **Network & Versioning** (fields 30--40): netout, netin,
   stayc, mento, diff, ll, con, pro, vv, vvnow, model
6. **Analytical** (fields 41--45): conv, bib, pol, his, doi

For each axiom × field, assign a coverage score:

- **Full** --- content exists in the corpus and can be extracted
- **Partial** --- some content exists but needs expansion
- **Stub** --- heading can be generated but content is empty
- **N/A** --- field does not apply to this element

Present the results as a grid: rows = elements (ax1_A1--ax25_A25, th5_T5--th11_T11),
columns = 45 fields. Use single-character codes: F/P/S/N.


====================================================================
STEP 2 --- GAP ANALYSIS
====================================================================

From the coverage matrix, identify:

1. **Critical gaps:** Fields that are rated "Stub" for MORE than
   50% of elements. These represent systemic missing data.

2. **Quick wins:** Fields that are rated "Partial" for many
   elements and could be upgraded to "Full" with a targeted
   extraction pass.

3. **Source-text gaps by tradition:** For fields 12--18, which
   traditions have good coverage? Which are empty? This determines
   the priority order for worldview compilation.

4. **Network completeness:** For fields 30--31 (netout/netin),
   can the full dependency graph be extracted from the existing
   content? List any missing edges.

5. **StayVS coverage:** For field 32 (stayc), do the existing
   StayVS assessments from Phase 2H cover all 36 elements?


====================================================================
STEP 3 --- EXTRACTION DIFFICULTY ASSESSMENT
====================================================================

For each PoR field, rate the extraction difficulty:

- **Auto** --- can be mechanically extracted from existing content
  (e.g., id, title, latex are already in the RST)
- **Parse** --- requires parsing existing prose but content exists
  (e.g., tctx can be derived from the explanation sections)
- **Synthesize** --- requires combining information from multiple
  sources (e.g., conv requires cross-referencing stress-test files)
- **Generate** --- requires new content not present in the corpus
  (e.g., easy intro for beginners, mento learning guidance)

Present as a single table: 45 rows (fields), columns = difficulty
rating + source files where content lives + notes.


====================================================================
STEP 4 --- WRITE FINDINGS TO A REPORT FILE
====================================================================

Create a new file:
source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/2I-por-field-testing.rst

Contents:

1. Title: "Phase 2I-2: PoR Field Testing Report"
2. Generated-by line with date and model
3. The coverage matrix (the full grid)
4. Gap analysis (5 sections from Step 2)
5. Extraction difficulty table (from Step 3)
6. Recommendations for Phase 3 priority ordering:
   which fields to populate first, which can wait
7. Any proposed changes to the 45-field structure
   (e.g., fields to merge, split, or drop)


====================================================================
STEP 5 --- UPDATE LLOG INDEX
====================================================================

Add the new report file to the toctree in:
source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/index.rst

Under a new "Phase 2I: Post-Processing" section AFTER the Phase 2H
entries.


====================================================================
CRITICAL RULES
====================================================================

1. llog files are APPEND-ONLY.
2. NEVER delete content files.
3. This session READS and ANALYSES only. The only file you CREATE
   is the testing report. The only file you MODIFY is the llog
   index.
4. NEVER abbreviate prompts in llogs.
5. LANGUAGE RULES:
   a. NEVER use bare "Jubilee" as standalone noun.
   b. NEVER use "the" for unproven superlatives.


.. admonition:: TELES migration report (2026m04d04)

   Mechanical identifier migration applied to this file.
   All axiom/theorem text references were migrated from short form
   (e.g., A15) to compound form (e.g., ax15_A15) as part of the
   matheology compound naming operation. Both forms refer to the
   same formal object. The old form survives as the suffix to
   ensure consistency with the oldest records; the new form adds
   a temporary-status prefix. Forward-facing pages use brief form
   (ax15) only. See
   :ref:`hell-ll-other-b15-teles-renaming-prompt` for the complete
   mapping table and :ref:`legacy-5d-link-names-table-for-pet-jub-model` for the permanent
   reference.