.. Migration note (2026m04d04): Claude copied this file during VV-to-HELL migration.
   Old path: ``vv/jub/oov2/llog/integration-findings/por-field-collision-check.rst`` (as given by LLoL)
   New path: ``hell/ll/jub/b/41/por-field-collision-check.rst`` (as chosen by Claude)
   Category: Integration finding (raw copy)

.. meta::
   :description: Does the name collision between PoR field #40 (model) and D2 type (model) cause real ambiguity? This data collection tracks actual usage patterns.
   :keywords: PoR field collision, field #40, D2 type, model ambiguity, naming conflict, BEST Names, real-world usage, integration finding, llog
   :author: Yah, Yas, everyone, LLoL as Laurence Loewe of Laodicea, ClaudeOp46Max, Anthropic, and Spirit of Boolean Truth
   :og:card:title: PoR Field #40 Collision<br>Model Name Ambiguity
   :og:card:description: PoR field and D2 type both use the word model. This empirical check determines whether that collision causes actual confusion in real content.

.. SOCIAL-CARD-QUALITY-COMPARE --- OO (default effort) vs PP (max effort), 2026-03-26
   OO :description: Data collection log tracking real-world collisions between PoR field #40 (model) and D2 type (model) across matheology content.
   OO :keywords: matheology, integration finding, PoR field, collision check, D2 type, model ambiguity, BEST Names, naming conflict, data collection, llog
   OO :og:card:title: Integration Finding:<br>PoR Field #40 Collision
   OO :og:card:description: Tracking whether the name collision between PoR field (model) and D2 type (model) causes actual ambiguity in practice.
   PP :description: Does the name collision between PoR field #40 (model) and D2 type (model) cause real ambiguity? This data collection tracks actual usage patterns.
   PP :keywords: PoR field collision, field #40, D2 type, model ambiguity, naming conflict, BEST Names, real-world usage, integration finding, llog
   PP :og:card:title: PoR Field #40 Collision<br>Model Name Ambiguity
   PP :og:card:description: PoR field and D2 type both use the word model. This empirical check determines whether that collision causes actual confusion in real content.

.. SOCIAL-CARD-REVIEW --- generated by Claude Opus 4.6, 2026-03-26
   dv_ClaOp46_PP_2026m03d26 --- max-effort rewrite, read full page.
   :description: 148 chars | :og:card:title: 41 chars (excl <br>)
   - [ ] PP title more compelling than OO title
   - [ ] PP description more accurate than OO description
   - [ ] Description hooks without misleading
   - [ ] Keywords specific to this page's actual content
   - [ ] No language rule violations
   - [ ] Character counts verified

:orphan:

.. include:: /_templates/include-file/page-prefix.rst

*********************************************************************
Integration Finding: PoR Field #40 Collision Check
*********************************************************************

.. note::

   **Data collection file.** Agents performing content integration should
   append rows below whenever they encounter the string ``model`` used as
   a label, heading, or reference --- noting whether it functions as a D2
   element type (``pet-model1``) or as PoR field #40 (``ModelUsedIn``).

   **Question being answered:** Does the name collision between PoR field
   ``model`` and D2 type ``model`` cause actual ambiguity in practice?
   Or is it purely theoretical?

   **How to report:** For each occurrence, record: the file, the context
   (label / heading / prose / ref target), which meaning is intended
   (D2 type or PoR field), and whether the context made it ambiguous.


Findings
==========

.. list-table::
   :header-rows: 1
   :widths: 30 15 15 40

   * - File
     - Context
     - Meaning
     - Ambiguous?
   * - ``pet/axioms.rst``
     - prose
     - PoR field
     - No --- "Which model uses this axiom" is clearly field #40
   * - ``aha-best-names...``
     - D2 registry
     - D2 type
     - No --- registry context makes it clear
   * - (example)
     - (label / prose / ref)
     - (D2 type / PoR field)
     - (Yes/No + brief explanation)


Summary (to be written after integration completes)
======================================================

*(Agents: after all content has been sorted, write a summary. How many
occurrences of each meaning? Any actual ambiguity? Recommend: rename
field #40 now, or leave it?)*