.. Migration note (2026m04d04): Claude copied this file during VV-to-HELL migration.
Old path: ``vv/jub/oov2/llog/llog_2026m03d23_restructuring-2I-design-session.rst`` (as given by LLoL)
New path: ``hell/ll/jub/b/38/jub_ll_2026m03d23_restructuring-2I-design-session.rst`` (as chosen by Claude)
Category: JUB OOv2 log
.. meta::
:description: Design session producing the BEST Names architecture: 7-dimensional grammar for stable, extensible matheology cross-reference labels using Evolvix.
:keywords: BEST Names, design session, Phase 2I, 7-dimensional grammar, Evolvix, cross-reference labels, label architecture, JUB OOv2, Claude Opus, llog
:author: Yah, Yas, everyone, LLoL as Laurence Loewe of Laodicea, ClaudeOp46Max, Anthropic, and Spirit of Boolean Truth
:og:card:title: BEST Names Design Session
Phase 2I Architecture
:og:card:description: The session that produced the BEST Names architecture: a 7-dimensional label grammar designed for 100+ years of collision-free operation.
.. SOCIAL-CARD-QUALITY-COMPARE --- OO (default effort) vs PP (max effort), 2026-03-26
OO :description: Session log: BEST Names architecture design session for matheology cross-reference labels. Part of JUB OOv2 Phase 2I.
OO :keywords: matheology, JUB, OOv2, Phase 2I, BEST Names, label architecture, cross-reference, Evolvix, design session, llog
OO :og:card:title: Phase 2I: BEST Names Design Session
OO :og:card:description: Design session producing the 7-dimensional BEST Names architecture for stable, extensible matheology cross-reference labels.
PP :description: Design session producing the BEST Names architecture: 7-dimensional grammar for stable, extensible matheology cross-reference labels using Evolvix.
PP :keywords: BEST Names, design session, Phase 2I, 7-dimensional grammar, Evolvix, cross-reference labels, label architecture, JUB OOv2, Claude Opus, llog
PP :og:card:title: BEST Names Design Session
Phase 2I Architecture
PP :og:card:description: The session that produced the BEST Names architecture: a 7-dimensional label grammar designed for 100+ years of collision-free operation.
.. SOCIAL-CARD-REVIEW --- generated by Claude Opus 4.6, 2026-03-26
dv_ClaOp46_PP_2026m03d26 --- max-effort rewrite, read full page.
:description: 149 chars | :og:card:title: 42 chars (excl
)
- [ ] PP title more compelling than OO title
- [ ] PP description more accurate than OO description
- [ ] Description hooks without misleading
- [ ] Keywords specific to this page's actual content
- [ ] No language rule violations
- [ ] Character counts verified
.. note:: **Editorial note (2026-03-24).**
This log uses "validated," "verified," and similar terms in places
where the author's long-standing practice is to say "tested" or
"checked." The distinction matters: open systems cannot be confirmed
correct by any finite set of checks --- they can only be tested
(see :ref:`not-tested-not-validated` in the adversarial stress-test
report for the full argument). The AI-generated text was not
corrected at the time of writing. The log is otherwise unaltered.
*********************************************************************
Phase 2I: BEST Names Architecture --- Design Session Log
*********************************************************************
:Generated: 2026-03-23 by Claude Opus 4.6
This llog documents the Phase 2I design session that produced the
BEST Names architecture for matheology cross-reference labels.
Phase 2I is a post-processing phase inserted between Phase 2H
(stress-test freeze) and Phase 3 (content deployment).
Phase 2I Purpose
==================
Phase 2H revealed that the ``.. include::`` directive creates
duplicate Sphinx labels when the same content appears in both a
source file and an aggregation page. Phase 2I resolves this by
designing a comprehensive, stable, extensible naming architecture
for all cross-reference labels across the matheology section.
The architecture applies the Evolvix BEST Naming system (Brief,
Explicit, Summarizing, Technical dialects) to a 7-dimensional
label grammar that is collision-free and parseable by an LL(1)
parser.
Design Session Overview
=========================
The design was developed iteratively over 4 rounds of refinement
in a single Claude Code session on 2026-03-23:
1. **Round 1 --- Initial Architecture:**
Established the PoE→PoC→PoR→PoT→PoU knowledge pipeline,
model-prefixed labels (``pet-ax1`` instead of ``ax1``),
the 7 orthogonal dimensions, and the DRY principle
(single point of truth in PoR; downstream views are compiled,
never assembled via ``.. include::``).
2. **Round 2 --- Detailed Refinement (~32 points):**
Expanded PoR from 14 to 40+ fields, defined D2 element types,
D5 worldview codes, D6 POST/analytical/machine sub-namespaces,
exclusion rules, extraction matrix keywords, and the
compilation skill specification.
3. **Round 3 --- Naming Corrections (~32 points):**
Renamed codes (``vtrib`` → ``vind``, ``mat`` → ``stayc``,
``path`` → ``mento``), reordered the grammar (language last),
consolidated machine codes under ``ma*`` prefix, split D5 into
source (``s*``) vs. view (``v*``), expanded PoR to 45 fields,
and designed the stub generation policy.
4. **Round 4 --- Integration and Compilation:**
Resolved collision questions (``aa``/``ff``/``ii`` ISO 639-1
collisions, ``hu``/``hub`` rename), confirmed LL(1) parsing,
finalized all registry tables, and wrote the AHA design
document and prompt scripts.
Key Design Decisions
======================
Label Grammar
--------------
::
{model}-{elementType}{itemNumber}[-{version}][-{depth}][-{view}][-{state}][-{language}]
All dimensions after the first two are optional. The fixed order
ensures LL(1) parseability. Hyphens separate dimensions; no
hyphens within dimension values (except compound codes like
``oov2``).
7 Orthogonal Dimensions
-------------------------
=== =========== ================ ====================================================
D# Name Examples Purpose
=== =========== ================ ====================================================
D1 Model pet, jub Which axiom system
D2 Element ax, th, lm, sy What kind of element
D3 Version oov2, v3 Which version of the content
D4 Depth easy, expert Audience level
D5 View/Source vjud, stor Religious/cultural perspective or source text
D6 State ff, diff, stayc Operational or analytical state
D7 Language en, de, ar ISO 639-1 (with 3 exceptions: aar, ful, iii)
=== =========== ================ ====================================================
Collision-Free Proof for D6
-----------------------------
D6 has three sub-namespaces:
- **Set A (POST):** 2-character double-letter codes (``aa``, ``cc``,
``dd``, ``ff``, ``gg``, ``hh``, ``jj``, ``kk``, ``ll``, ``vv``,
``ww``, ``yy``)
- **Set B (Analytical):** 3+ character codes, no ``ma`` prefix
(``diff``, ``net``, ``stayc``, ``mento``, ``conv``, ``bib``,
``cit``, ``ref``, ``web``, ``doi``, ``hub``, ``pol``, ``his``)
- **Set C (Machine):** ``ma`` prefix (``mab``, ``mai``, ``mapi``,
``mardf``, ``majld``)
These cannot collide: Set A matches ``/^([a-z])\1$/``, Set B
matches ``/^[a-z]{3,}$/`` without ``ma`` prefix, Set C matches
``/^ma[a-z]+$/``. The sets are pairwise disjoint by construction.
Source vs. View Distinction
-----------------------------
- **View codes** (``v*``): Broad tradition synthesis --- how a
worldview interprets the axioms (``vjud``, ``vchr``, ``visl``,
``vhin``, ``vsec``, ``vbud``, ``vind``, ``vbah``, ``vzor``,
``vrom``, ``vgre``, ``vcan``, ``vbab``, ``vegy``)
- **Source codes** (``s*``): Narrow text corpora with chapter+verse
structure (``stor``, ``sheb``, ``stal``, ``sgos``, ``sapo``,
``squr``, ``shad``, ``ssan``, ``ssut``)
ISO 639-1 Collision Resolution
--------------------------------
Three ISO 639-1 language codes collide with POST codes:
- ``aa`` (Afar) → use ``aar`` (ISO 639-3)
- ``ff`` (Fulah) → use ``ful`` (ISO 639-3)
- ``ii`` (Sichuan Yi) → use ``iii`` (ISO 639-3)
Additionally, ``hu`` (Hungarian) collides with the analytical code
``hu`` (Human Hub), resolved by renaming the latter to ``hub``.
Design rule: never assign a 2-letter code to Set B.
Deliverables
==============
AHA Design Document
---------------------
Written to:
``source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/llog/aha-best-names-for-matheology-links.rst``
Contains 16 sections: core principle, knowledge pipeline,
7 dimensions with full registries, 45 PoR fields in 6 groups,
extraction matrix keywords, link stability policy, compilation
skill specification, prose reference conventions, and label
examples.
Prompt Scripts (9 sessions)
-----------------------------
Written to ``source/matheology/vv/jub/oov2/prompts/`` in
execution order. Sessions 2I-2 and 2I-7 were each split into (a)
and (b) halves to fit the 200K-token context window:
1. **prompt_2I-1.rst** --- Label migration (``ax1`` → ``pet-ax1``)
2. **prompt_2I-2a.rst** --- PoR field validation, Part A: fields
1--18 (Identity, Technical, Source-Text)
3. **prompt_2I-2b.rst** --- PoR field validation, Part B: fields
19--45 (Operational, Network, Analytical) + combined report
4. **prompt_2I-3.rst** --- Compilation skill definition
(extraction matrix, 4 modes, stub policy)
5. **prompt_2I-4.rst** --- First compilation run (expert + easy
views for all 25 axioms)
6. **prompt_2I-5.rst** --- Adversarial stress-test (collision,
parsing, scalability, human-factors, contradiction attacks)
7. **prompt_2I-6.rst** --- Public-facing documentation (4 audience
pages: easy, producer, expert, architect)
8. **prompt_2I-7a.rst** --- Phase 2I closing: deliverable audit
9. **prompt_2I-7b.rst** --- Phase 2I closing: closing llog and
handoff
Token-budget optimizations applied to sessions 2I-1, 2I-4, and
2I-5: selective reads for quest.rst (~48K tokens) and the debug
file (~37K tokens) using grep + targeted offset reads instead of
full file reads.
Phase 3 Handoff Notes
========================
Phase 2I is a *design* phase. The prompts above define the
*execution* plan. Phase 3 should:
1. Execute prompt 2I-1 (migration) first --- this is the
prerequisite for everything else
2. Execute prompts 2I-2a through 2I-6 in order
3. Execute prompts 2I-7a and 2I-7b to close Phase 2I formally
4. Begin Phase 3 content work with the BEST Names architecture
in place
The adversarial stress-test (prompt 2I-5) can optionally run in
parallel with earlier prompts as a design review.
.. admonition:: TELES repair — 2026m04d04
Repaired RST syntax errors (unexpected indentation, heading level inconsistencies,
or list formatting). No formal content was modified.