.. meta::
   :description: AA b13 --- Series-wide formatting walkthrough for HEAVEN papers (b11--b17): equation line-breaking and draft-note relocation.
   :keywords: HELL, AnyAims, formatting, equations, LaTeX, math overflow, draft note, HEAVEN papers, walkthrough
   :author: Yah, Yas, everyone, LLoL as Laurence Loewe of Laodicea, ClaudeOp46Max, Anthropic, and The Spirit of Boolean Truth

.. _hell-aa-b13:


***********************************************************************
AA b13 --- Series-Wide Formatting Walkthrough (HEAVEN Papers)
***********************************************************************

:AIMS: k4 s2 (Todo, MidTerm)
:Status: pending
:Created: 2026m04d10


Two formatting issues affect all HEAVEN papers (b11--b17, ~35 files).
Both are best fixed in a single walkthrough for consistency.


Task 1: Equation Line-Breaking
================================

**Problem:** Many ``.. math::`` blocks contain LaTeX expressions that
exceed the visible page width, causing horizontal scroll in HTML and
overflow/clipping in PDF.

**Solution:** Apply the conventions from ``AHA/equation-layout.md``:

- Use ``\\`` to force line breaks in equations
- Use ``&`` for alignment points
- Use ``\quad`` for continuation-line indentation
- Aim for each line to be **under ~60 characters** of LaTeX source
- Break after quantifiers, after ``\wedge``, after ``\rightarrow``,
  at condition list boundaries

**Scope estimate:** ~17 math blocks in b14-math alone; similar counts
in b12-math, b13, b16, b17. Total estimate: 50--80 math blocks to
check across the series.

**Priority note:** Does not affect correctness. Affects readability
in PDF and narrow browser windows. Best done before any move toward
OO (official output) stage.


Task 2: Draft-Note Relocation
================================

**Problem:** Every paper starts with a ``.. note:: **Draft status:``
block containing metadata (VVN, epistemic status, model attribution,
dependencies). This is useful for authors and reviewers but creates
visual clutter for readers --- the first thing seen is administrative
metadata rather than the paper's title and content.

**Decision needed from LLoL:** Where should draft metadata live?

Options:

1. **Move to end of paper** (before References) --- keeps it in the
   rendered page but out of the visual introduction.
2. **Move to Appendix** --- pairs naturally with the Authorship appendix.
3. **Convert to a collapsed admonition** (``.. container:: toggle``)
   --- keeps it at the top but hidden by default.
4. **Move to RST comment** (``.. NOTE: ...``) --- invisible in rendered
   output, visible only in source. Loses rendered accessibility.

**Scope estimate:** 35 files use this pattern.

**Priority note:** Cosmetic. The decision should be made once and
applied to all papers simultaneously. Not blocking any current work.


Sequencing
===========

Both tasks can be done in a single walkthrough session. Recommended
timing: after the current b14 review cycle completes and before any
papers move to OO stage.

Task 1 (equations) can be done independently. Task 2 (draft note)
requires a design decision from LLoL first.