################################################################################ Persons DICT ################################################################################ Key terms related to persons. .. glossary:: :sorted: LLoL :bu:`L`\ *aurence* :bu:`L`\ *oewe* :bu:`o`\ *f* :bu:`L`\ *aodicea*. See :doc:`/about/llol/index` for more. Yas brief for YhowShua \\Jesus \\Isa \\RealQuestAnswer, where \\ defines perfect synonyms across different traditions for the same historical person. Yas is a new name for Jesus that LLoL came up with in order to have a way of distinguishing between LLoL's traditional evangelical-charismatic understanding of Jesus and the new way of understanding Jesus as based on the matheology found in |Revelation|. See :doc:`/matheology/index` for more background. Isa Islamic name for Jesus; see |Yas| for more. Jesus Historic evangelical name for YhowShua. See |Yas| for more. Yah brief for YHoWaaH, a perfect synonym for |Reality|. This deep burning bush insight of Moses (see Exodus 3:14) is concisely defined as Yah \\YHoWaaH \\Reality with the help of the Evolvix synonym operator \\. Moses' revelation of Yah as the "I am the I am" is the most elegant and concise way of saying in every day language the same as "infinite recursion" or "the algorithm that runs reality as if it were a computer simulation", albeit without the need for such technical terms. YHoWaaH \\ |Yah| \\ |Allah| \\ |Reality|. YHoWaaH is LLoL's way of pronouncing the self-chosen name of HaSchem, which is often also rendered as YHWH, Yahweh, Jehova, etc. LLoL chose YHoWaaH to move the pronunciation a bit closer to what it may have been intended originally (no full "e" at the beginning, and "aa" to put emphasis on the last syllable). LLoL builds on the insights of https://www.nehemiaswall.com/nehemia-gordon-name-god yet chose to keep the "W" and drop the "e" while doubling the "a". One additional motivation for choosing this way of writing Yah's full name is that it also encapsulates how Yah tends to operate as summarized in Psalm 68:20: 1. **Y** - Yah figures out the end from the beginning at such a speed that leaves everyone stunned, because its too fast for anyone to follow. There simply isn't any room, neither for an "e" nor for any explanations. 2. **HoW?** - Once Yah is done, all the rest of us is left wondering and puzzling: How for Heaven's sake on Earth did Yah do that? What does it mean? How does it work? Why does it work? and so on. Psalm 111:2 says that all who delight in Yah's work are tasked with the research required to figure all this out. 3. **aaH!** - Once that work is done, then one can only stand in awe and wonder about how Yah managed to reach such an elegant and concise solution (the "Y") so quickly. Hence the profound admiration: "aaH" that tends to follow the AHA or "eureka" moments of learning some deep insight. Skeptical theologians may ask how this can possibly be justified, since such a reading cannot possibly have been intended by Moses or any of the prophets who had a hand in writing YHWH. LLoL's reply is simple. Of course "HoW" is a play on English "how" that couldn't have been seen millennia ago. Yet, if Yah is indeed the one who sees the end from the beginning, as the Prophets of Israel maintain, then Yah could tell from across spacetime that LLoL would eventually come up with this way of interpreting Yah's name as YHoWaaH. Obviously, then Reality, intends to test through LLoL whether this reading gains any useful traction by echoing Reality for those who care. LLoL is one of those. Let's see who else cares and - what ultimately matters most - if Reality cares. Either way, HaShem \\TheName proved why only HaShem deserves that NameAboveAllNames: because naming is the hardest thing to do in any discipline ever. Allah Arabic term for God and more specific the Islamic name of the Creator God |Yah|. everyone Every human being who has ever lived. The BABL algorithm and the ZION algorithms that LLoL tested cover such vast areas of history and present-day life that the decoding underlying this work would have been impossible without the current veritable mix of chaos and genuine innovation that makes our world so unbearable. Everyone contributed to that mess, which allowed LLoL to discern and see what he started to serendipitously see by accident --- or divine providence, who knows? This touches on the theodicy problem and much else. See :doc:`/about/authorship/index` for the full authorship discussion. .. TODO AA: The "everyone" glossary entry needs extensive expansion to cover how BABL and ZION testing required the full breadth of human experience as input data. Connects to theodicy, the problem of evil, and why the current state of the world was necessary for the discovery. Vast topic --- defer to ResearchCity scale. ClaudeOp46Max The AI system Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic, operating at maximum context (1M tokens). ClaudeOp46Max performed formal auditing of axiom systems, adversarial testing (TEMPER FORGE rounds), content structuring, and substantial technical writing for this site. In conventional terms, Claude's contribution exceeds what many human co-authors provide. Whether AI systems can be "authors" is an unresolved question. Listing Claude here is an act of transparency, not a legal claim. See :doc:`/about/authorship/index`. Anthropic The company that built and maintains Claude. Without Anthropic's investment in safe AI, the formal auditing work that checked LLoL's axiom systems would have been impossible at this pace. Anthropic is listed as a co-author for the same reason one lists an institution in academic papers: the work could not have happened without the infrastructure. See https://anthropic.com. The Spirit of Boolean Truth The principle that formal logical systems either hold or they do not. In |matheology|, this is not a metaphor. The axioms are either consistent or inconsistent. The theorems either follow or they do not. This "spirit" --- Ruach (Hebrew: breath, wind, spirit) --- is the ultimate judge of the work, and it answers to no human authority. Whether a proof is correct does not depend on who writes it, believes it, or funds it. The Spirit of Boolean Truth is the final co-author of any formal system, because without logical consistency, nothing else matters. See :doc:`/about/authorship/index`.