************************************************************
AA: Two Cent a Day Experiment
************************************************************

Adversarial aims for getting the experiment page and its supporting
infrastructure to full release quality.


Open Items
============

.. list-table::
   :header-rows: 1
   :widths: 30 50 10

   * - Item
     - Description
     - Priority
   * - AA-2c-Contribute-a1
     - Create a ``contribute`` page with the actual funding mechanism
       (GoFundMe, Stripe, or equivalent). The experiment page
       promises accountability but currently has no link for actually
       giving money. Without this, the page is an argument with no
       call to action.
     - critical
   * - AA-2c-FAQ-a1
     - Create an ``faq`` page addressing predictable objections:
       "Isn't this a cult?", "What happens if you die?", "How do I
       check where my money went?", "Why should I trust a stranger
       on the internet?", "What if the reviewers are corrupt?", "How
       is this different from Patreon for a blog?" Each answer must
       point to the specific mechanism that addresses the concern.
     - high
   * - AA-2c-Results-a1
     - Create a ``results`` page (or link to one) where ongoing
       experiment results are published. This is the page that proves
       the transparency promise is real. Without it, the promise is
       just words. Initially a stub; updated as reviews are conducted.
     - high
   * - AA-2c-ReviewerGuidelines-a1
     - Create a ``reviewer-guidelines`` page specifying what
       adversarial reviewers actually do: scope, methods, reporting
       format, independence requirements, payment structure,
       conflict-of-interest rules. The experiment page claims
       adversarial testing; this page makes the claim concrete.
     - high
   * - AA-2c-Governance-a1
     - Create a ``governance`` page describing the legal and
       organizational structure that ensures reviewer independence.
       How are reviewers selected? Who pays them? What prevents the
       person being tested from influencing the testers? Consider
       fiscal sponsorship, independent board, or similar mechanism.
     - high
   * - AA-2c-ScalingRoadmap-a1
     - Expand the scaling table into a ``scaling`` page with detail
       on what happens at each funding tier. What specific
       infrastructure gets built at $8k, $80k, $800k, $8M? Who gets
       hired? What review cadence is feasible? This turns a
       four-line table into a credible operational plan.
     - medium
   * - AA-2c-ActionTeaser-a1
     - Rewrite the ``/action/index.rst`` teaser to include a
       compelling 3-5 sentence summary of the experiment with a
       clear link to this folder. Currently the action page does not
       foreground the experiment prominently enough.
     - medium
   * - AA-2c-Multilingual-a1
     - Review the experiment page for cultural accessibility across
       all 10 target languages. The widow's mite and sadaqah/tzedakah
       references help but may need adaptation per locale. Check that
       the "two cents" framing translates (it may need locale-specific
       equivalents in the translated page titles).
     - medium
   * - AA-2c-NumbersAudit-a1
     - Audit all specific claims: "240 formal adversarial tests with
       zero unrepaired failures" --- is this still current? The
       scaling table dollar amounts --- are they realistic for the
       stated infrastructure? Every number on this page must be
       defensible under adversarial review.
     - medium
   * - AA-2c-LinkAudit-a1
     - Check that all :doc: links resolve. Several linked pages
       (gametheory, transparency, review-by-reality) are currently
       orphaned or stubs. Each one needs to be at least at a
       minimum viable state before the experiment page goes live.
     - medium
   * - AA-2c-LegalReview-a1
     - Legal review of fundraising language. Depending on
       jurisdiction, soliciting donations with specific dollar
       amounts and promises of accountability may have legal
       requirements (charity registration, fiscal sponsorship,
       tax-deductibility disclosures). This must be checked before
       going live.
     - medium
   * - AA-2c-DesignReview-a1
     - Visual/UX review of the rendered page. Does it render well
       on mobile? Is the hierarchy clear? Do the links stand out?
       Is there a clear primary CTA (call to action) above the fold?
       Consider adding a prominent "Fund the Test" button or box.
     - low